Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships

BACKGROUND: Whenever different data sets arrive at conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses, only testable causal explanations of sources of errors in at least one of the data sets allow us to critically choose among the conflicting hypotheses of relationships. The large (28S) and small (18S) subunit rRN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Reumont, Björn M, Meusemann, Karen, Szucsich, Nikolaus U, Dell'Ampio, Emiliano, Gowri-Shankar, Vivek, Bartel, Daniela, Simon, Sabrina, Letsch, Harald O, Stocsits, Roman R, Luan, Yun-xia, Wägele, Johann Wolfgang, Pass, Günther, Hadrys, Heike, Misof, Bernhard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19473484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-119

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19473484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-119

Ejemplares similares