Cargando…

How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity

BACKGROUND: Studies show that the burden of malaria remains huge particularly in low-income settings. Although effective malaria control measures such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) have been promoted, relatively little is known about their equity dimension. Understanding variations in their use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matovu, Fred, Goodman, Catherine, Wiseman, Virginia, Mwengee, William
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-109
_version_ 1782168200050376704
author Matovu, Fred
Goodman, Catherine
Wiseman, Virginia
Mwengee, William
author_facet Matovu, Fred
Goodman, Catherine
Wiseman, Virginia
Mwengee, William
author_sort Matovu, Fred
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies show that the burden of malaria remains huge particularly in low-income settings. Although effective malaria control measures such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) have been promoted, relatively little is known about their equity dimension. Understanding variations in their use in low-income settings is important for scaling up malaria control programmes particularly ITNs. The objective of this paper is to measure the extent and causes of inequalities in the ownership and utilisation of bed nets across socioeconomic groups (SEGs) and age groups in Tanga District, north-eastern Tanzania. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to heads of 1,603 households from rural and urban areas. Households were categorized into SEGs using both an asset-based wealth index and education level of the household head. Concentration indices and regression-based measures of inequality were computed to analyse both vertical and horizontal inequalities in ownership and utilisation of bed nets. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were used to explore community perspectives on the causes of inequalities. RESULTS: Use of ITNs remained appallingly low compared to the RBM target of 80% coverage. Inequalities in ownership of ITNs and all nets combined were significantly pro-rich and were much more pronounced in rural areas. FGDs revealed that lack of money was the key factor for not using ITNs followed by negative perceptions about the effect of insecticides on the health of users. Household SES, living within the urban areas and being under-five were positively associated with bed net ownership and/or utilisation. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the need for mass distribution of ITN; a community-wide programme to treat all untreated nets and to promote the use of Long-Lasting Insecticidal nets (LLINs) or longer-lasting treatment of nets. The rural population and under-fives should be targeted through highly subsidised schemes and mass distribution of free nets. Public campaigns are also needed to encourage people to use treated nets and mitigate negative perceptions about insecticides.
format Text
id pubmed-2695473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26954732009-06-12 How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity Matovu, Fred Goodman, Catherine Wiseman, Virginia Mwengee, William Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Studies show that the burden of malaria remains huge particularly in low-income settings. Although effective malaria control measures such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) have been promoted, relatively little is known about their equity dimension. Understanding variations in their use in low-income settings is important for scaling up malaria control programmes particularly ITNs. The objective of this paper is to measure the extent and causes of inequalities in the ownership and utilisation of bed nets across socioeconomic groups (SEGs) and age groups in Tanga District, north-eastern Tanzania. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to heads of 1,603 households from rural and urban areas. Households were categorized into SEGs using both an asset-based wealth index and education level of the household head. Concentration indices and regression-based measures of inequality were computed to analyse both vertical and horizontal inequalities in ownership and utilisation of bed nets. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were used to explore community perspectives on the causes of inequalities. RESULTS: Use of ITNs remained appallingly low compared to the RBM target of 80% coverage. Inequalities in ownership of ITNs and all nets combined were significantly pro-rich and were much more pronounced in rural areas. FGDs revealed that lack of money was the key factor for not using ITNs followed by negative perceptions about the effect of insecticides on the health of users. Household SES, living within the urban areas and being under-five were positively associated with bed net ownership and/or utilisation. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the need for mass distribution of ITN; a community-wide programme to treat all untreated nets and to promote the use of Long-Lasting Insecticidal nets (LLINs) or longer-lasting treatment of nets. The rural population and under-fives should be targeted through highly subsidised schemes and mass distribution of free nets. Public campaigns are also needed to encourage people to use treated nets and mitigate negative perceptions about insecticides. BioMed Central 2009-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2695473/ /pubmed/19460153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-109 Text en Copyright © 2009 Matovu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Matovu, Fred
Goodman, Catherine
Wiseman, Virginia
Mwengee, William
How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity
title How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity
title_full How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity
title_fullStr How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity
title_full_unstemmed How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity
title_short How equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in Tanzania? A practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity
title_sort how equitable is bed net ownership and utilisation in tanzania? a practical application of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19460153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-109
work_keys_str_mv AT matovufred howequitableisbednetownershipandutilisationintanzaniaapracticalapplicationoftheprinciplesofhorizontalandverticalequity
AT goodmancatherine howequitableisbednetownershipandutilisationintanzaniaapracticalapplicationoftheprinciplesofhorizontalandverticalequity
AT wisemanvirginia howequitableisbednetownershipandutilisationintanzaniaapracticalapplicationoftheprinciplesofhorizontalandverticalequity
AT mwengeewilliam howequitableisbednetownershipandutilisationintanzaniaapracticalapplicationoftheprinciplesofhorizontalandverticalequity