Cargando…

Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears

There is discussion over the benefit of continuing cervical screening in women over the age of 50 with a history of negative cytology. We aimed to determine the risk of abnormal cytology in such women. Screening history data from 1985 to 2003 were obtained for a cohort of 2 million women from the NH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanks, R G, Moss, S M, Addou, S, Coleman, D A, Swerdlow, A J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19417745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605069
_version_ 1782168222868439040
author Blanks, R G
Moss, S M
Addou, S
Coleman, D A
Swerdlow, A J
author_facet Blanks, R G
Moss, S M
Addou, S
Coleman, D A
Swerdlow, A J
author_sort Blanks, R G
collection PubMed
description There is discussion over the benefit of continuing cervical screening in women over the age of 50 with a history of negative cytology. We aimed to determine the risk of abnormal cytology in such women. Screening history data from 1985 to 2003 were obtained for a cohort of 2 million women from the NHS cervical screening programme from four Health Authorities in England. The 57 651 women in the cohort who reached age 40 between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 1990 and had at least one routine or opportunistic smear between ages 50 and 54 were included in the analysis. Exposure groups (negative cytology history, negative but including inadequate smears, and positive history) were defined on the basis of screening histories from ages 40 to 49. Sixty-four percent (134/206) (95% CI: 57–71%) of the moderate dyskaryosis or worse lesions at ages over 50 were detected from women in the negative smear history group. After allowance for time since last negative smear, the relative risk for the first primary smear over the age of 50 having moderate dyskaryosis or worse decreased from 0.60 (95% CI: 0.41–0.84) for two negative smear episodes to 0.25 (95% CI: 0.10–0.56) for four negative smear episodes, compared with the positive history group. If screening were discontinued for all women over 50 with a negative history, the majority of cytological abnormalities now being detected at these ages that lead directly to referral to colposcopy would be missed.
format Text
id pubmed-2695690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26956902010-06-02 Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears Blanks, R G Moss, S M Addou, S Coleman, D A Swerdlow, A J Br J Cancer Epidemiology There is discussion over the benefit of continuing cervical screening in women over the age of 50 with a history of negative cytology. We aimed to determine the risk of abnormal cytology in such women. Screening history data from 1985 to 2003 were obtained for a cohort of 2 million women from the NHS cervical screening programme from four Health Authorities in England. The 57 651 women in the cohort who reached age 40 between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 1990 and had at least one routine or opportunistic smear between ages 50 and 54 were included in the analysis. Exposure groups (negative cytology history, negative but including inadequate smears, and positive history) were defined on the basis of screening histories from ages 40 to 49. Sixty-four percent (134/206) (95% CI: 57–71%) of the moderate dyskaryosis or worse lesions at ages over 50 were detected from women in the negative smear history group. After allowance for time since last negative smear, the relative risk for the first primary smear over the age of 50 having moderate dyskaryosis or worse decreased from 0.60 (95% CI: 0.41–0.84) for two negative smear episodes to 0.25 (95% CI: 0.10–0.56) for four negative smear episodes, compared with the positive history group. If screening were discontinued for all women over 50 with a negative history, the majority of cytological abnormalities now being detected at these ages that lead directly to referral to colposcopy would be missed. Nature Publishing Group 2009-06-02 2009-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2695690/ /pubmed/19417745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605069 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Blanks, R G
Moss, S M
Addou, S
Coleman, D A
Swerdlow, A J
Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears
title Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears
title_full Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears
title_fullStr Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears
title_full_unstemmed Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears
title_short Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears
title_sort risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19417745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605069
work_keys_str_mv AT blanksrg riskofcervicalabnormalityafterage50inwomenwithpreviouslynegativesmears
AT mosssm riskofcervicalabnormalityafterage50inwomenwithpreviouslynegativesmears
AT addous riskofcervicalabnormalityafterage50inwomenwithpreviouslynegativesmears
AT colemanda riskofcervicalabnormalityafterage50inwomenwithpreviouslynegativesmears
AT swerdlowaj riskofcervicalabnormalityafterage50inwomenwithpreviouslynegativesmears