Cargando…
Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort
To assess long-term health effects of ovarian-stimulation drugs we followed-up for over 20 years a British cohort of 7355 women with ovulatory disorders, 43% of whom were prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs, and identified a total of 274 deaths and 367 incident cancers. Relative to the general popu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19436296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605086 |
_version_ | 1782168224588103680 |
---|---|
author | dos Santos Silva, I Wark, P A McCormack, V A Mayer, D Overton, C Little, V Nieto, J Hardiman, P Davies, M MacLean, A B |
author_facet | dos Santos Silva, I Wark, P A McCormack, V A Mayer, D Overton, C Little, V Nieto, J Hardiman, P Davies, M MacLean, A B |
author_sort | dos Santos Silva, I |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess long-term health effects of ovarian-stimulation drugs we followed-up for over 20 years a British cohort of 7355 women with ovulatory disorders, 43% of whom were prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs, and identified a total of 274 deaths and 367 incident cancers. Relative to the general population, the cohort experienced lower mortality from most causes, including from all neoplasms combined, and lower incidence of cervical cancer, but higher incidence of cancers of the breast (relative risk: 1.13; 95% CI 0.97, 1.30) and corpus uteri (2.02; 1.37, 2.87). There were, however, no significant differences in the risk of cancers of the breast, corpus uteri, ovary, or of any other site, between women who had been prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs and those who had not. Further analyses by type of drug and dose revealed a dose–response gradient in the risk of cancer of the corpus uteri (P for linear trend=0.03), with women given ⩾2250 mg of clomiphene having a 2.6-fold (2.62; 0.94, 6.82) increase in risk relative to those who were not treated. These findings do not support strong associations between ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks, but they indicate the need for continued monitoring to establish whether risks are elevated in certain subgroups of users. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2695698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26956982010-06-02 Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort dos Santos Silva, I Wark, P A McCormack, V A Mayer, D Overton, C Little, V Nieto, J Hardiman, P Davies, M MacLean, A B Br J Cancer Epidemiology To assess long-term health effects of ovarian-stimulation drugs we followed-up for over 20 years a British cohort of 7355 women with ovulatory disorders, 43% of whom were prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs, and identified a total of 274 deaths and 367 incident cancers. Relative to the general population, the cohort experienced lower mortality from most causes, including from all neoplasms combined, and lower incidence of cervical cancer, but higher incidence of cancers of the breast (relative risk: 1.13; 95% CI 0.97, 1.30) and corpus uteri (2.02; 1.37, 2.87). There were, however, no significant differences in the risk of cancers of the breast, corpus uteri, ovary, or of any other site, between women who had been prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs and those who had not. Further analyses by type of drug and dose revealed a dose–response gradient in the risk of cancer of the corpus uteri (P for linear trend=0.03), with women given ⩾2250 mg of clomiphene having a 2.6-fold (2.62; 0.94, 6.82) increase in risk relative to those who were not treated. These findings do not support strong associations between ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks, but they indicate the need for continued monitoring to establish whether risks are elevated in certain subgroups of users. Nature Publishing Group 2009-06-02 2009-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2695698/ /pubmed/19436296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605086 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology dos Santos Silva, I Wark, P A McCormack, V A Mayer, D Overton, C Little, V Nieto, J Hardiman, P Davies, M MacLean, A B Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort |
title | Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort |
title_full | Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort |
title_fullStr | Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort |
title_short | Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort |
title_sort | ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a british cohort |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19436296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dossantossilvai ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT warkpa ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT mccormackva ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT mayerd ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT overtonc ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT littlev ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT nietoj ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT hardimanp ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT daviesm ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort AT macleanab ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort |