Cargando…

Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort

To assess long-term health effects of ovarian-stimulation drugs we followed-up for over 20 years a British cohort of 7355 women with ovulatory disorders, 43% of whom were prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs, and identified a total of 274 deaths and 367 incident cancers. Relative to the general popu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: dos Santos Silva, I, Wark, P A, McCormack, V A, Mayer, D, Overton, C, Little, V, Nieto, J, Hardiman, P, Davies, M, MacLean, A B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19436296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605086
_version_ 1782168224588103680
author dos Santos Silva, I
Wark, P A
McCormack, V A
Mayer, D
Overton, C
Little, V
Nieto, J
Hardiman, P
Davies, M
MacLean, A B
author_facet dos Santos Silva, I
Wark, P A
McCormack, V A
Mayer, D
Overton, C
Little, V
Nieto, J
Hardiman, P
Davies, M
MacLean, A B
author_sort dos Santos Silva, I
collection PubMed
description To assess long-term health effects of ovarian-stimulation drugs we followed-up for over 20 years a British cohort of 7355 women with ovulatory disorders, 43% of whom were prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs, and identified a total of 274 deaths and 367 incident cancers. Relative to the general population, the cohort experienced lower mortality from most causes, including from all neoplasms combined, and lower incidence of cervical cancer, but higher incidence of cancers of the breast (relative risk: 1.13; 95% CI 0.97, 1.30) and corpus uteri (2.02; 1.37, 2.87). There were, however, no significant differences in the risk of cancers of the breast, corpus uteri, ovary, or of any other site, between women who had been prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs and those who had not. Further analyses by type of drug and dose revealed a dose–response gradient in the risk of cancer of the corpus uteri (P for linear trend=0.03), with women given ⩾2250 mg of clomiphene having a 2.6-fold (2.62; 0.94, 6.82) increase in risk relative to those who were not treated. These findings do not support strong associations between ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks, but they indicate the need for continued monitoring to establish whether risks are elevated in certain subgroups of users.
format Text
id pubmed-2695698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26956982010-06-02 Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort dos Santos Silva, I Wark, P A McCormack, V A Mayer, D Overton, C Little, V Nieto, J Hardiman, P Davies, M MacLean, A B Br J Cancer Epidemiology To assess long-term health effects of ovarian-stimulation drugs we followed-up for over 20 years a British cohort of 7355 women with ovulatory disorders, 43% of whom were prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs, and identified a total of 274 deaths and 367 incident cancers. Relative to the general population, the cohort experienced lower mortality from most causes, including from all neoplasms combined, and lower incidence of cervical cancer, but higher incidence of cancers of the breast (relative risk: 1.13; 95% CI 0.97, 1.30) and corpus uteri (2.02; 1.37, 2.87). There were, however, no significant differences in the risk of cancers of the breast, corpus uteri, ovary, or of any other site, between women who had been prescribed ovarian-stimulation drugs and those who had not. Further analyses by type of drug and dose revealed a dose–response gradient in the risk of cancer of the corpus uteri (P for linear trend=0.03), with women given ⩾2250 mg of clomiphene having a 2.6-fold (2.62; 0.94, 6.82) increase in risk relative to those who were not treated. These findings do not support strong associations between ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks, but they indicate the need for continued monitoring to establish whether risks are elevated in certain subgroups of users. Nature Publishing Group 2009-06-02 2009-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2695698/ /pubmed/19436296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605086 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
dos Santos Silva, I
Wark, P A
McCormack, V A
Mayer, D
Overton, C
Little, V
Nieto, J
Hardiman, P
Davies, M
MacLean, A B
Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort
title Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort
title_full Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort
title_fullStr Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort
title_full_unstemmed Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort
title_short Ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a British cohort
title_sort ovulation-stimulation drugs and cancer risks: a long-term follow-up of a british cohort
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19436296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605086
work_keys_str_mv AT dossantossilvai ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT warkpa ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT mccormackva ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT mayerd ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT overtonc ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT littlev ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT nietoj ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT hardimanp ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT daviesm ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort
AT macleanab ovulationstimulationdrugsandcancerrisksalongtermfollowupofabritishcohort