Cargando…

Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device

BACKGROUND: A sagittal plane spine reposition sense device (SRSD) has been developed. Two questions were addressed with this study concerning the new SRSD: 1) whether spine movement was occurring with the methodology, and 2) where movement was taking place. METHODS: Sixty-five subjects performed sev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersen, Cheryl M, Rundquist, Peter J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19386126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-12
_version_ 1782168234995220480
author Petersen, Cheryl M
Rundquist, Peter J
author_facet Petersen, Cheryl M
Rundquist, Peter J
author_sort Petersen, Cheryl M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A sagittal plane spine reposition sense device (SRSD) has been developed. Two questions were addressed with this study concerning the new SRSD: 1) whether spine movement was occurring with the methodology, and 2) where movement was taking place. METHODS: Sixty-five subjects performed seven trials of repositioning to a two-thirds full flexion position in sitting with X and Y displacement measurements taken at the T4 and L3 levels. The thoracolumbar angle between the T4 and the L3 level was computed and compared between the positions tested. A two (vertebral level of thoracic and lumbar) by seven (trials) mixed model repeated measures ANOVA indicated whether significant differences were present between the thoracic (T4) and lumbar (L3) angular measurements. RESULTS: Calculated thoracolumbar angles between T4 and L3 were significantly different for all positions tested indicating spinal movement was occurring with testing. No interactions were found between the seven trials and the two vertebral levels. No significant findings were found between the seven trials but significant differences were found between the two vertebral levels. CONCLUSION: This study indicated spine motion was taking place with the SRSD methodology and movement was found specific to the lumbar spine. These findings support utilizing the SRSD to evaluate changes in spine reposition sense during future intervention studies dealing with low back pain.
format Text
id pubmed-2695817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26958172009-06-13 Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device Petersen, Cheryl M Rundquist, Peter J J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: A sagittal plane spine reposition sense device (SRSD) has been developed. Two questions were addressed with this study concerning the new SRSD: 1) whether spine movement was occurring with the methodology, and 2) where movement was taking place. METHODS: Sixty-five subjects performed seven trials of repositioning to a two-thirds full flexion position in sitting with X and Y displacement measurements taken at the T4 and L3 levels. The thoracolumbar angle between the T4 and the L3 level was computed and compared between the positions tested. A two (vertebral level of thoracic and lumbar) by seven (trials) mixed model repeated measures ANOVA indicated whether significant differences were present between the thoracic (T4) and lumbar (L3) angular measurements. RESULTS: Calculated thoracolumbar angles between T4 and L3 were significantly different for all positions tested indicating spinal movement was occurring with testing. No interactions were found between the seven trials and the two vertebral levels. No significant findings were found between the seven trials but significant differences were found between the two vertebral levels. CONCLUSION: This study indicated spine motion was taking place with the SRSD methodology and movement was found specific to the lumbar spine. These findings support utilizing the SRSD to evaluate changes in spine reposition sense during future intervention studies dealing with low back pain. BioMed Central 2009-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2695817/ /pubmed/19386126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-12 Text en Copyright © 2009 Petersen and Rundquist; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Petersen, Cheryl M
Rundquist, Peter J
Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device
title Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device
title_full Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device
title_fullStr Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device
title_full_unstemmed Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device
title_short Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device
title_sort validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19386126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-12
work_keys_str_mv AT petersencherylm validationofspinalmotionwiththespinerepositionsensedevice
AT rundquistpeterj validationofspinalmotionwiththespinerepositionsensedevice