Cargando…

Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer

Alternative lymph node (LN) parameters have been proposed to improve staging in colorectal cancer. This study compared these alternative parameters with conventional TNM staging in predicting long-term survival in patients undergoing curative resection. A total of 295 consecutive patients (mean age...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moug, S J, Saldanha, J D, McGregor, J R, Balsitis, M, Diament, R H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2696755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19401684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605049
_version_ 1782168279710695424
author Moug, S J
Saldanha, J D
McGregor, J R
Balsitis, M
Diament, R H
author_facet Moug, S J
Saldanha, J D
McGregor, J R
Balsitis, M
Diament, R H
author_sort Moug, S J
collection PubMed
description Alternative lymph node (LN) parameters have been proposed to improve staging in colorectal cancer. This study compared these alternative parameters with conventional TNM staging in predicting long-term survival in patients undergoing curative resection. A total of 295 consecutive patients (mean age 70 years; range 39–95; s.d. 10.4) underwent resection for colorectal cancer from 2001 to 2004. Age, sex, primary tumour site, TNM stage and chemotherapy/radiotherapy were recorded. Patients with colon and rectal cancers were analysed separately for LN parameters: LN total; adequate LN retrieval (⩾12) and inadequate (<12); total number of negative LN; total number of positive LN and the ratio of positive LN to total LN (pLNR). Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed. The median number of LN retrieved was 10 (1–57) with adequate LN retrieval in 147 cases (49.8%). For each T and N stage, inadequate LN retrieval did not adversely affect long-term survival (P>0.05). On multivariate analysis, only pLNR was an independent predictor of overall survival in both colon and rectal cancers (HR 11.65, 95% CI 5.00–27.15, P<0.001 and HR 13.40, 95% CI 3.64–49.10, P<0.001, respectively). Application of pLNR subdivided patients into four prognostic groups. Application of the pLNR improved patient stratification in colorectal cancer and should be considered in future staging systems.
format Text
id pubmed-2696755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26967552010-05-19 Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer Moug, S J Saldanha, J D McGregor, J R Balsitis, M Diament, R H Br J Cancer Clinical Study Alternative lymph node (LN) parameters have been proposed to improve staging in colorectal cancer. This study compared these alternative parameters with conventional TNM staging in predicting long-term survival in patients undergoing curative resection. A total of 295 consecutive patients (mean age 70 years; range 39–95; s.d. 10.4) underwent resection for colorectal cancer from 2001 to 2004. Age, sex, primary tumour site, TNM stage and chemotherapy/radiotherapy were recorded. Patients with colon and rectal cancers were analysed separately for LN parameters: LN total; adequate LN retrieval (⩾12) and inadequate (<12); total number of negative LN; total number of positive LN and the ratio of positive LN to total LN (pLNR). Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed. The median number of LN retrieved was 10 (1–57) with adequate LN retrieval in 147 cases (49.8%). For each T and N stage, inadequate LN retrieval did not adversely affect long-term survival (P>0.05). On multivariate analysis, only pLNR was an independent predictor of overall survival in both colon and rectal cancers (HR 11.65, 95% CI 5.00–27.15, P<0.001 and HR 13.40, 95% CI 3.64–49.10, P<0.001, respectively). Application of pLNR subdivided patients into four prognostic groups. Application of the pLNR improved patient stratification in colorectal cancer and should be considered in future staging systems. Nature Publishing Group 2009-05-19 2009-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2696755/ /pubmed/19401684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605049 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Moug, S J
Saldanha, J D
McGregor, J R
Balsitis, M
Diament, R H
Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer
title Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer
title_full Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer
title_short Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer
title_sort positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2696755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19401684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605049
work_keys_str_mv AT mougsj positivelymphnoderetrievalratiooptimisespatientstagingincolorectalcancer
AT saldanhajd positivelymphnoderetrievalratiooptimisespatientstagingincolorectalcancer
AT mcgregorjr positivelymphnoderetrievalratiooptimisespatientstagingincolorectalcancer
AT balsitism positivelymphnoderetrievalratiooptimisespatientstagingincolorectalcancer
AT diamentrh positivelymphnoderetrievalratiooptimisespatientstagingincolorectalcancer