Cargando…

A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study

The aim of this paper was to study the performance of a novel fish breeding scheme, which is a combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection using stochastic simulation. In this walk-back selection scheme, batches of different sizes (50, 100, 1000, 5000 and 10 000) with the phenotypica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sonesson, Anna K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2697239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16277969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-37-7-587
_version_ 1782168312314068992
author Sonesson, Anna K
author_facet Sonesson, Anna K
author_sort Sonesson, Anna K
collection PubMed
description The aim of this paper was to study the performance of a novel fish breeding scheme, which is a combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection using stochastic simulation. In this walk-back selection scheme, batches of different sizes (50, 100, 1000, 5000 and 10 000) with the phenotypically superior fish from one tank with mixed families were genotyped to set up the pedigree. BLUP estimated breeding values were calculated. The optimum contribution selection method was used with the rate of inbreeding (ΔF) constrained to 0.005 or 0.01 per generation. If the constraint on ΔF could not be held, a second batch of fish was genotyped etc. Compared with the genotyping of all selection candidates (1000, 5000 or 10 000), the use of batches saves genotyping costs. The results show that two batches of 50 fish were often necessary. With a batch size of 100, genetic level was 76–92% of the genetic level achieved for schemes with all fish being genotyped and thus candidates for the optimum contribution selection step. More parents were selected for schemes with larger batches, resulting in a higher genetic gain, especially when all selection candidates were genotyped. There was little extra genetic gain in genotyping of 1000 fish instead of 100 for the larger schemes of 5000 and 10 000 candidates. The accuracy of breeding values was similar for all batch sizes (~0.30), but higher (~0.5) when all candidates were included. Since only the phenotypically most superior fish were genotyped, BLUP-EBV were biased. Compared with genotyping of all selection candidates, the use of batches saves genotyping costs, while simultaneously maintaining high genetic gains.
format Text
id pubmed-2697239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26972392009-06-16 A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study Sonesson, Anna K Genet Sel Evol Research The aim of this paper was to study the performance of a novel fish breeding scheme, which is a combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection using stochastic simulation. In this walk-back selection scheme, batches of different sizes (50, 100, 1000, 5000 and 10 000) with the phenotypically superior fish from one tank with mixed families were genotyped to set up the pedigree. BLUP estimated breeding values were calculated. The optimum contribution selection method was used with the rate of inbreeding (ΔF) constrained to 0.005 or 0.01 per generation. If the constraint on ΔF could not be held, a second batch of fish was genotyped etc. Compared with the genotyping of all selection candidates (1000, 5000 or 10 000), the use of batches saves genotyping costs. The results show that two batches of 50 fish were often necessary. With a batch size of 100, genetic level was 76–92% of the genetic level achieved for schemes with all fish being genotyped and thus candidates for the optimum contribution selection step. More parents were selected for schemes with larger batches, resulting in a higher genetic gain, especially when all selection candidates were genotyped. There was little extra genetic gain in genotyping of 1000 fish instead of 100 for the larger schemes of 5000 and 10 000 candidates. The accuracy of breeding values was similar for all batch sizes (~0.30), but higher (~0.5) when all candidates were included. Since only the phenotypically most superior fish were genotyped, BLUP-EBV were biased. Compared with genotyping of all selection candidates, the use of batches saves genotyping costs, while simultaneously maintaining high genetic gains. BioMed Central 2005-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2697239/ /pubmed/16277969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-37-7-587 Text en Copyright © 2005 INRA, EDP Sciences
spellingShingle Research
Sonesson, Anna K
A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study
title A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study
title_full A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study
title_fullStr A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study
title_short A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study
title_sort combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2697239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16277969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-37-7-587
work_keys_str_mv AT sonessonannak acombinationofwalkbackandoptimumcontributionselectioninfishasimulationstudy
AT sonessonannak combinationofwalkbackandoptimumcontributionselectioninfishasimulationstudy