Cargando…

Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting

A pericentric inversion of chromosome 4 in a boar, as well as a case of (2q-;5p+) translocation mosaicism in a bull were analysed by chromosome painting using probes generated by conventional microdissection. For the porcine inversion, probes specific for p arms and q arms were produced and hybridis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinton, Alain, Ducos, Alain, Yerle, Martine
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14604515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-35-7-685
_version_ 1782168361595043840
author Pinton, Alain
Ducos, Alain
Yerle, Martine
author_facet Pinton, Alain
Ducos, Alain
Yerle, Martine
author_sort Pinton, Alain
collection PubMed
description A pericentric inversion of chromosome 4 in a boar, as well as a case of (2q-;5p+) translocation mosaicism in a bull were analysed by chromosome painting using probes generated by conventional microdissection. For the porcine inversion, probes specific for p arms and q arms were produced and hybridised simultaneously on metaphases of a heterozygote carrier. In the case of the bovine translocation, two whole chromosome probes (chromosome 5, and derived chromosome 5) were elaborated and hybridised independently on chromosomal preparations of the bull who was a carrier of the mosaic translocation. The impossibility of differentiating chromosomes 2 and der(2) from other chromosomes of the metaphases did not allow the production of painting probes for these chromosomes. For all experiments, the quality of painting was comparable to that usually observed with probes obtained from flow-sorted chromosomes. The results obtained allowed confirmation of the interpretations proposed with G-banding karyotype analyses. In the bovine case, however, the reciprocity of the translocation could not be proven. The results presented in this paper show the usefulness of the microdissection technique for characterising chromosomal rearrangements in species for which commercial probes are not available. They also confirmed that the main limiting factor of the technique is the quality of the chromosomal preparations, which does not allow the identification of target chromosomes or chromosome fragments in all cases.
format Text
id pubmed-2698006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26980062009-06-18 Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting Pinton, Alain Ducos, Alain Yerle, Martine Genet Sel Evol Research A pericentric inversion of chromosome 4 in a boar, as well as a case of (2q-;5p+) translocation mosaicism in a bull were analysed by chromosome painting using probes generated by conventional microdissection. For the porcine inversion, probes specific for p arms and q arms were produced and hybridised simultaneously on metaphases of a heterozygote carrier. In the case of the bovine translocation, two whole chromosome probes (chromosome 5, and derived chromosome 5) were elaborated and hybridised independently on chromosomal preparations of the bull who was a carrier of the mosaic translocation. The impossibility of differentiating chromosomes 2 and der(2) from other chromosomes of the metaphases did not allow the production of painting probes for these chromosomes. For all experiments, the quality of painting was comparable to that usually observed with probes obtained from flow-sorted chromosomes. The results obtained allowed confirmation of the interpretations proposed with G-banding karyotype analyses. In the bovine case, however, the reciprocity of the translocation could not be proven. The results presented in this paper show the usefulness of the microdissection technique for characterising chromosomal rearrangements in species for which commercial probes are not available. They also confirmed that the main limiting factor of the technique is the quality of the chromosomal preparations, which does not allow the identification of target chromosomes or chromosome fragments in all cases. BioMed Central 2003-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2698006/ /pubmed/14604515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-35-7-685 Text en Copyright © 2003 INRA, EDP Sciences
spellingShingle Research
Pinton, Alain
Ducos, Alain
Yerle, Martine
Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting
title Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting
title_full Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting
title_fullStr Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting
title_full_unstemmed Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting
title_short Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting
title_sort chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14604515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-35-7-685
work_keys_str_mv AT pintonalain chromosomalrearrangementsincattleandpigsrevealedbychromosomemicrodissectionandchromosomepainting
AT ducosalain chromosomalrearrangementsincattleandpigsrevealedbychromosomemicrodissectionandchromosomepainting
AT yerlemartine chromosomalrearrangementsincattleandpigsrevealedbychromosomemicrodissectionandchromosomepainting