Cargando…
Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer
OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Radiological Society
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15637472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.225 |
_version_ | 1782168387010428928 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Joon Seok Kim, Myeong-Jin Lee, Kang Young Kim, Nam Kyu Choi, Jin-Sub Kim, Joo Hee Oh, Young Taik Kim, Won Ho Kim, Ki Whang |
author_facet | Lim, Joon Seok Kim, Myeong-Jin Lee, Kang Young Kim, Nam Kyu Choi, Jin-Sub Kim, Joo Hee Oh, Young Taik Kim, Won Ho Kim, Ki Whang |
author_sort | Lim, Joon Seok |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2698166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | The Korean Radiological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-26981662009-06-23 Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer Lim, Joon Seok Kim, Myeong-Jin Lee, Kang Young Kim, Nam Kyu Choi, Jin-Sub Kim, Joo Hee Oh, Young Taik Kim, Won Ho Kim, Ki Whang Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. The Korean Radiological Society 2004 2004-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2698166/ /pubmed/15637472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.225 Text en Copyright © 2004 The Korean Radiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lim, Joon Seok Kim, Myeong-Jin Lee, Kang Young Kim, Nam Kyu Choi, Jin-Sub Kim, Joo Hee Oh, Young Taik Kim, Won Ho Kim, Ki Whang Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer |
title | Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer |
title_full | Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer |
title_short | Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer |
title_sort | follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic mr imaging for hepatic metastasis from rectal cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15637472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limjoonseok followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer AT kimmyeongjin followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer AT leekangyoung followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer AT kimnamkyu followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer AT choijinsub followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer AT kimjoohee followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer AT ohyoungtaik followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer AT kimwonho followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer AT kimkiwhang followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer |