Cargando…

Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Joon Seok, Kim, Myeong-Jin, Lee, Kang Young, Kim, Nam Kyu, Choi, Jin-Sub, Kim, Joo Hee, Oh, Young Taik, Kim, Won Ho, Kim, Ki Whang
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Radiological Society 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15637472
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.225
_version_ 1782168387010428928
author Lim, Joon Seok
Kim, Myeong-Jin
Lee, Kang Young
Kim, Nam Kyu
Choi, Jin-Sub
Kim, Joo Hee
Oh, Young Taik
Kim, Won Ho
Kim, Ki Whang
author_facet Lim, Joon Seok
Kim, Myeong-Jin
Lee, Kang Young
Kim, Nam Kyu
Choi, Jin-Sub
Kim, Joo Hee
Oh, Young Taik
Kim, Won Ho
Kim, Ki Whang
author_sort Lim, Joon Seok
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-2698166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher The Korean Radiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26981662009-06-23 Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer Lim, Joon Seok Kim, Myeong-Jin Lee, Kang Young Kim, Nam Kyu Choi, Jin-Sub Kim, Joo Hee Oh, Young Taik Kim, Won Ho Kim, Ki Whang Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. The Korean Radiological Society 2004 2004-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2698166/ /pubmed/15637472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.225 Text en Copyright © 2004 The Korean Radiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Joon Seok
Kim, Myeong-Jin
Lee, Kang Young
Kim, Nam Kyu
Choi, Jin-Sub
Kim, Joo Hee
Oh, Young Taik
Kim, Won Ho
Kim, Ki Whang
Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer
title Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer
title_full Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer
title_fullStr Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer
title_short Follow-up Results After Negative Findings on Unenhanced Hepatic MR Imaging for Hepatic Metastasis from Rectal Cancer
title_sort follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic mr imaging for hepatic metastasis from rectal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15637472
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.225
work_keys_str_mv AT limjoonseok followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer
AT kimmyeongjin followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer
AT leekangyoung followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer
AT kimnamkyu followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer
AT choijinsub followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer
AT kimjoohee followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer
AT ohyoungtaik followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer
AT kimwonho followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer
AT kimkiwhang followupresultsafternegativefindingsonunenhancedhepaticmrimagingforhepaticmetastasisfromrectalcancer