Cargando…

A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol

BACKGROUND: Failure to reconcile patient preferences and values as well as social norms with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations may hamper their implementation in clinical practice. However, little is known about patients and public involvement programs (PPIP) in CPGs development an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Légaré, France, Boivin, Antoine, Weijden, Trudy van der, Packenham, Christine, Tapp, Sylvie, Burgers, Jako
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19497114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-30
_version_ 1782168441172525056
author Légaré, France
Boivin, Antoine
Weijden, Trudy van der
Packenham, Christine
Tapp, Sylvie
Burgers, Jako
author_facet Légaré, France
Boivin, Antoine
Weijden, Trudy van der
Packenham, Christine
Tapp, Sylvie
Burgers, Jako
author_sort Légaré, France
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Failure to reconcile patient preferences and values as well as social norms with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations may hamper their implementation in clinical practice. However, little is known about patients and public involvement programs (PPIP) in CPGs development and implementation. This study aims at identifying what it is about PPIP that works, in which contexts are PPIP most likely to be effective, and how are PPIP assumed to lead to better CPGs development and implementation. METHODS AND DESIGN: A knowledge synthesis will be conducted in four phases. In phase one, literature on PPIP in CPGs development will be searched through bibliographic databases. A call for bibliographic references and unpublished reports will also be sent via the mailing lists of relevant organizations. Eligible publications will include original qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods study designs reporting on a PPIP pertaining to CPGs development or implementation. They will also include documents produced by CPGs organizations to describe their PPIP. In phase two, grounded in the program's logic model, two independent reviewers will extract data to collect information on the principal components and activities of PPIP, the resources needed, the contexts in which PPIP were developed and tested, and the assumptions underlying PPIP. Quality assessment will be made for all retained publications. Our literature search will be complemented with interviews of key informants drawn from of a purposive sample of CPGs developers and patient/public representatives. In phase three, we will synthesize evidence from both the publications and interviews data using template content analysis to organize the identified components in a meaningful framework of PPIP theories. During a face-to-face workshop, findings will be validated with different stakeholder and a final toolkit for CPGs developers will be refined. DISCUSSION: The proposed research project will be among the first to explore the PPIP in CPGs development and implementation based on a wide range of publications and key informants interviews. It is anticipated that the results generated by the proposed study will significantly contribute to the improvement of the reconciliation of CPGs with patient preferences and values as well as with social norms.
format Text
id pubmed-2698931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-26989312009-06-19 A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol Légaré, France Boivin, Antoine Weijden, Trudy van der Packenham, Christine Tapp, Sylvie Burgers, Jako Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Failure to reconcile patient preferences and values as well as social norms with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations may hamper their implementation in clinical practice. However, little is known about patients and public involvement programs (PPIP) in CPGs development and implementation. This study aims at identifying what it is about PPIP that works, in which contexts are PPIP most likely to be effective, and how are PPIP assumed to lead to better CPGs development and implementation. METHODS AND DESIGN: A knowledge synthesis will be conducted in four phases. In phase one, literature on PPIP in CPGs development will be searched through bibliographic databases. A call for bibliographic references and unpublished reports will also be sent via the mailing lists of relevant organizations. Eligible publications will include original qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods study designs reporting on a PPIP pertaining to CPGs development or implementation. They will also include documents produced by CPGs organizations to describe their PPIP. In phase two, grounded in the program's logic model, two independent reviewers will extract data to collect information on the principal components and activities of PPIP, the resources needed, the contexts in which PPIP were developed and tested, and the assumptions underlying PPIP. Quality assessment will be made for all retained publications. Our literature search will be complemented with interviews of key informants drawn from of a purposive sample of CPGs developers and patient/public representatives. In phase three, we will synthesize evidence from both the publications and interviews data using template content analysis to organize the identified components in a meaningful framework of PPIP theories. During a face-to-face workshop, findings will be validated with different stakeholder and a final toolkit for CPGs developers will be refined. DISCUSSION: The proposed research project will be among the first to explore the PPIP in CPGs development and implementation based on a wide range of publications and key informants interviews. It is anticipated that the results generated by the proposed study will significantly contribute to the improvement of the reconciliation of CPGs with patient preferences and values as well as with social norms. BioMed Central 2009-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2698931/ /pubmed/19497114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-30 Text en Copyright © 2009 Légaré et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Légaré, France
Boivin, Antoine
Weijden, Trudy van der
Packenham, Christine
Tapp, Sylvie
Burgers, Jako
A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
title A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
title_full A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
title_fullStr A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
title_short A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
title_sort knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19497114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-30
work_keys_str_mv AT legarefrance aknowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT boivinantoine aknowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT weijdentrudyvander aknowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT packenhamchristine aknowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT tappsylvie aknowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT burgersjako aknowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT legarefrance knowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT boivinantoine knowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT weijdentrudyvander knowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT packenhamchristine knowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT tappsylvie knowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol
AT burgersjako knowledgesynthesisofpatientandpublicinvolvementinclinicalpracticeguidelinesstudyprotocol