Cargando…

Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Two Phase III randomized controlled clinical trials were conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of weekly subcutaneous administration of efalizumab for the treatment of psoriasis. Patient reported measures of psoriasis-related functionality and health-related quality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shikiar, Richard, Bresnahan, Brian W, Stone, Stephen P, Thompson, Christine, Koo, John, Revicki, Dennis A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC269993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-53
_version_ 1782121005536247808
author Shikiar, Richard
Bresnahan, Brian W
Stone, Stephen P
Thompson, Christine
Koo, John
Revicki, Dennis A
author_facet Shikiar, Richard
Bresnahan, Brian W
Stone, Stephen P
Thompson, Christine
Koo, John
Revicki, Dennis A
author_sort Shikiar, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two Phase III randomized controlled clinical trials were conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of weekly subcutaneous administration of efalizumab for the treatment of psoriasis. Patient reported measures of psoriasis-related functionality and health-related quality of life and of psoriasis-related symptom assessments were included as part of the trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the patient reported outcome measures that were used in the trials – the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment (PSA) Scale, and two itch measures, a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) itch measure. METHODS: Subjects aged 18 to 70 years with moderate to severe psoriasis for at least 6 months were recruited into the two clinical trials (n = 1095). Internal consistency reliability was evaluated for all patient reported outcomes at baseline and at 12 weeks. Construct validity was evaluated by relations among the different patient reported outcomes and between the patient reported outcomes and the clinical assessments (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; Overall Lesion Severity Scale; Physician's Global Assessment of Change) assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks, as was the change over the course of the 12 week portion of the trial. RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.86 to 0.95 for the patient reported outcome measures. The patient reported outcome measures were all shown to have significant construct validity with respect to each other and with respect to the clinical assessments. The four measures also demonstrated significant responsiveness to change in underlying clinical status of the patients over the course of the trial, as measured by the independently assessed clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The DLQI, the PSA, VAS, and the NPF are considered useful tools for the measurement of dermatology-related limitations of functional ability and the frequency, severity and impact of psoriasis symptoms on patients' lives and psoriasis-related quality of life.
format Text
id pubmed-269993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-2699932003-11-21 Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials Shikiar, Richard Bresnahan, Brian W Stone, Stephen P Thompson, Christine Koo, John Revicki, Dennis A Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Two Phase III randomized controlled clinical trials were conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of weekly subcutaneous administration of efalizumab for the treatment of psoriasis. Patient reported measures of psoriasis-related functionality and health-related quality of life and of psoriasis-related symptom assessments were included as part of the trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the patient reported outcome measures that were used in the trials – the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment (PSA) Scale, and two itch measures, a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) itch measure. METHODS: Subjects aged 18 to 70 years with moderate to severe psoriasis for at least 6 months were recruited into the two clinical trials (n = 1095). Internal consistency reliability was evaluated for all patient reported outcomes at baseline and at 12 weeks. Construct validity was evaluated by relations among the different patient reported outcomes and between the patient reported outcomes and the clinical assessments (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; Overall Lesion Severity Scale; Physician's Global Assessment of Change) assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks, as was the change over the course of the 12 week portion of the trial. RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.86 to 0.95 for the patient reported outcome measures. The patient reported outcome measures were all shown to have significant construct validity with respect to each other and with respect to the clinical assessments. The four measures also demonstrated significant responsiveness to change in underlying clinical status of the patients over the course of the trial, as measured by the independently assessed clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The DLQI, the PSA, VAS, and the NPF are considered useful tools for the measurement of dermatology-related limitations of functional ability and the frequency, severity and impact of psoriasis symptoms on patients' lives and psoriasis-related quality of life. BioMed Central 2003-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC269993/ /pubmed/14613569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-53 Text en Copyright © 2003 Shikiar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research
Shikiar, Richard
Bresnahan, Brian W
Stone, Stephen P
Thompson, Christine
Koo, John
Revicki, Dennis A
Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials
title Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials
title_full Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials
title_short Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials
title_sort validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC269993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-53
work_keys_str_mv AT shikiarrichard validityandreliabilityofpatientreportedoutcomesusedinpsoriasisresultsfromtworandomizedclinicaltrials
AT bresnahanbrianw validityandreliabilityofpatientreportedoutcomesusedinpsoriasisresultsfromtworandomizedclinicaltrials
AT stonestephenp validityandreliabilityofpatientreportedoutcomesusedinpsoriasisresultsfromtworandomizedclinicaltrials
AT thompsonchristine validityandreliabilityofpatientreportedoutcomesusedinpsoriasisresultsfromtworandomizedclinicaltrials
AT koojohn validityandreliabilityofpatientreportedoutcomesusedinpsoriasisresultsfromtworandomizedclinicaltrials
AT revickidennisa validityandreliabilityofpatientreportedoutcomesusedinpsoriasisresultsfromtworandomizedclinicaltrials