Cargando…

How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample

BACKGROUND: Older studies have shown that patients often do not understand the terms used by doctors and many do not even have a rudimentary understanding of anatomy. The present study was designed to investigate the levels of anatomical knowledge of different patient groups and the general public i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinman, John, Yusuf, Gibran, Berks, Robert, Rayner, Sam, Petrie, Keith J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19523189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-43
_version_ 1782168569355698176
author Weinman, John
Yusuf, Gibran
Berks, Robert
Rayner, Sam
Petrie, Keith J
author_facet Weinman, John
Yusuf, Gibran
Berks, Robert
Rayner, Sam
Petrie, Keith J
author_sort Weinman, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older studies have shown that patients often do not understand the terms used by doctors and many do not even have a rudimentary understanding of anatomy. The present study was designed to investigate the levels of anatomical knowledge of different patient groups and the general public in order to see whether this has improved over time and whether patients with a specific organ pathology (e.g. liver disease) have a relatively better understanding of the location of that organ. METHODS: Level of anatomical knowledge was assessed on a multiple-choice questionnaire, in a sample of 722 participants, comprising approximately 100 patients in each of 6 different diagnostic groups and 133 in the general population, using a between-groups, cross-sectional design. Comparisons of relative accuracy of anatomical knowledge between the present and earlier results, and across the clinical and general public groups were evaluated using Chi square tests. Associations with age and education were assessed with the Pearson correlation test and one-way analysis of variance, respectively. RESULTS: Across groups knowledge of the location of body organs was poor and has not significantly improved since an earlier equivalent study over 30 years ago (χ(2 )= 0.04, df = 1, ns). Diagnostic groups did not differ in their overall scores but those with liver disease and diabetes were more accurate regarding the location of their respective affected organs (χ(2 )= 18.10, p < 0.001, df = 1; χ(2 )= 10.75, p < 0.01, df = 1). Age was significantly negatively correlated (r = -0.084, p = 0.025) and education was positively correlated with anatomical knowledge (F = 12.94, p = 0.000). Although there was no overall gender difference, women were significantly better at identifying organs on female body outlines. CONCLUSION: Many patients and general public do not know the location of key body organs, even those in which their medical problem is located, which could have important consequences for doctor-patient communication. These results indicate that healthcare professionals still need to take care in providing organ specific information to patients and should not assume that patients have this information, even for those organs in which their medical problem is located.
format Text
id pubmed-2700077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27000772009-06-23 How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample Weinman, John Yusuf, Gibran Berks, Robert Rayner, Sam Petrie, Keith J BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Older studies have shown that patients often do not understand the terms used by doctors and many do not even have a rudimentary understanding of anatomy. The present study was designed to investigate the levels of anatomical knowledge of different patient groups and the general public in order to see whether this has improved over time and whether patients with a specific organ pathology (e.g. liver disease) have a relatively better understanding of the location of that organ. METHODS: Level of anatomical knowledge was assessed on a multiple-choice questionnaire, in a sample of 722 participants, comprising approximately 100 patients in each of 6 different diagnostic groups and 133 in the general population, using a between-groups, cross-sectional design. Comparisons of relative accuracy of anatomical knowledge between the present and earlier results, and across the clinical and general public groups were evaluated using Chi square tests. Associations with age and education were assessed with the Pearson correlation test and one-way analysis of variance, respectively. RESULTS: Across groups knowledge of the location of body organs was poor and has not significantly improved since an earlier equivalent study over 30 years ago (χ(2 )= 0.04, df = 1, ns). Diagnostic groups did not differ in their overall scores but those with liver disease and diabetes were more accurate regarding the location of their respective affected organs (χ(2 )= 18.10, p < 0.001, df = 1; χ(2 )= 10.75, p < 0.01, df = 1). Age was significantly negatively correlated (r = -0.084, p = 0.025) and education was positively correlated with anatomical knowledge (F = 12.94, p = 0.000). Although there was no overall gender difference, women were significantly better at identifying organs on female body outlines. CONCLUSION: Many patients and general public do not know the location of key body organs, even those in which their medical problem is located, which could have important consequences for doctor-patient communication. These results indicate that healthcare professionals still need to take care in providing organ specific information to patients and should not assume that patients have this information, even for those organs in which their medical problem is located. BioMed Central 2009-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2700077/ /pubmed/19523189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-43 Text en Copyright © 2009 Weinman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weinman, John
Yusuf, Gibran
Berks, Robert
Rayner, Sam
Petrie, Keith J
How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample
title How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample
title_full How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample
title_fullStr How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample
title_full_unstemmed How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample
title_short How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample
title_sort how accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19523189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-43
work_keys_str_mv AT weinmanjohn howaccurateispatientsanatomicalknowledgeacrosssectionalquestionnairestudyofsixpatientgroupsandageneralpublicsample
AT yusufgibran howaccurateispatientsanatomicalknowledgeacrosssectionalquestionnairestudyofsixpatientgroupsandageneralpublicsample
AT berksrobert howaccurateispatientsanatomicalknowledgeacrosssectionalquestionnairestudyofsixpatientgroupsandageneralpublicsample
AT raynersam howaccurateispatientsanatomicalknowledgeacrosssectionalquestionnairestudyofsixpatientgroupsandageneralpublicsample
AT petriekeithj howaccurateispatientsanatomicalknowledgeacrosssectionalquestionnairestudyofsixpatientgroupsandageneralpublicsample