Cargando…
Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
BACKGROUND: Addition of glutamine to enteral nutrition formulas is consistently associated with a significant decrease in septic morbidity in critically ill patients, possibly related to the attenuation of gut dysfunction. This pilot study was undertaken to compare the effects of enteral administrat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-2-13 |
_version_ | 1782121009146494976 |
---|---|
author | Preiser, Jean-Charles Peres-Bota, Daliana Eisendrath, Pierre Vincent, Jean-Louis Van Gossum, André |
author_facet | Preiser, Jean-Charles Peres-Bota, Daliana Eisendrath, Pierre Vincent, Jean-Louis Van Gossum, André |
author_sort | Preiser, Jean-Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Addition of glutamine to enteral nutrition formulas is consistently associated with a significant decrease in septic morbidity in critically ill patients, possibly related to the attenuation of gut dysfunction. This pilot study was undertaken to compare the effects of enteral administration of two glutamine-enriched formulas containing either additional free glutamine or glutamine-rich proteins, with a standard solution on plasma and mucosal concentrations of glutamine in patients admitted in the Department of Intensive Care. METHODS: Following randomization, glutamine concentration was determined in endoscopically sampled duodenal biopsies and plasma, before and after a 7-day period of continuous administration of the designated solution. RESULTS: The mucosal concentration of glutamine increased in the duodenal biopsies sampled from patients randomized to the solution containing the glutamine-rich proteins (from 3.6 ± 2.2 to 6.7 ± 5.2 micro-mol/g protein), but not from the others. There were no differences between the 3 groups in the plasma concentrations of glutamine, which remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: The source of supplemental glutamine can influence gut mucosal glutamine concentrations, suggesting differences in its availability or utilization. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-270008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-2700082003-11-21 Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients Preiser, Jean-Charles Peres-Bota, Daliana Eisendrath, Pierre Vincent, Jean-Louis Van Gossum, André Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: Addition of glutamine to enteral nutrition formulas is consistently associated with a significant decrease in septic morbidity in critically ill patients, possibly related to the attenuation of gut dysfunction. This pilot study was undertaken to compare the effects of enteral administration of two glutamine-enriched formulas containing either additional free glutamine or glutamine-rich proteins, with a standard solution on plasma and mucosal concentrations of glutamine in patients admitted in the Department of Intensive Care. METHODS: Following randomization, glutamine concentration was determined in endoscopically sampled duodenal biopsies and plasma, before and after a 7-day period of continuous administration of the designated solution. RESULTS: The mucosal concentration of glutamine increased in the duodenal biopsies sampled from patients randomized to the solution containing the glutamine-rich proteins (from 3.6 ± 2.2 to 6.7 ± 5.2 micro-mol/g protein), but not from the others. There were no differences between the 3 groups in the plasma concentrations of glutamine, which remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: The source of supplemental glutamine can influence gut mucosal glutamine concentrations, suggesting differences in its availability or utilization. BioMed Central 2003-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC270008/ /pubmed/14613506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-2-13 Text en Copyright © 2003 Preiser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Preiser, Jean-Charles Peres-Bota, Daliana Eisendrath, Pierre Vincent, Jean-Louis Van Gossum, André Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients |
title | Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients |
title_full | Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients |
title_fullStr | Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients |
title_short | Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients |
title_sort | gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-2-13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT preiserjeancharles gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients AT peresbotadaliana gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients AT eisendrathpierre gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients AT vincentjeanlouis gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients AT vangossumandre gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients |