Cargando…

Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND: Addition of glutamine to enteral nutrition formulas is consistently associated with a significant decrease in septic morbidity in critically ill patients, possibly related to the attenuation of gut dysfunction. This pilot study was undertaken to compare the effects of enteral administrat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Preiser, Jean-Charles, Peres-Bota, Daliana, Eisendrath, Pierre, Vincent, Jean-Louis, Van Gossum, André
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-2-13
_version_ 1782121009146494976
author Preiser, Jean-Charles
Peres-Bota, Daliana
Eisendrath, Pierre
Vincent, Jean-Louis
Van Gossum, André
author_facet Preiser, Jean-Charles
Peres-Bota, Daliana
Eisendrath, Pierre
Vincent, Jean-Louis
Van Gossum, André
author_sort Preiser, Jean-Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Addition of glutamine to enteral nutrition formulas is consistently associated with a significant decrease in septic morbidity in critically ill patients, possibly related to the attenuation of gut dysfunction. This pilot study was undertaken to compare the effects of enteral administration of two glutamine-enriched formulas containing either additional free glutamine or glutamine-rich proteins, with a standard solution on plasma and mucosal concentrations of glutamine in patients admitted in the Department of Intensive Care. METHODS: Following randomization, glutamine concentration was determined in endoscopically sampled duodenal biopsies and plasma, before and after a 7-day period of continuous administration of the designated solution. RESULTS: The mucosal concentration of glutamine increased in the duodenal biopsies sampled from patients randomized to the solution containing the glutamine-rich proteins (from 3.6 ± 2.2 to 6.7 ± 5.2 micro-mol/g protein), but not from the others. There were no differences between the 3 groups in the plasma concentrations of glutamine, which remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: The source of supplemental glutamine can influence gut mucosal glutamine concentrations, suggesting differences in its availability or utilization.
format Text
id pubmed-270008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-2700082003-11-21 Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients Preiser, Jean-Charles Peres-Bota, Daliana Eisendrath, Pierre Vincent, Jean-Louis Van Gossum, André Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: Addition of glutamine to enteral nutrition formulas is consistently associated with a significant decrease in septic morbidity in critically ill patients, possibly related to the attenuation of gut dysfunction. This pilot study was undertaken to compare the effects of enteral administration of two glutamine-enriched formulas containing either additional free glutamine or glutamine-rich proteins, with a standard solution on plasma and mucosal concentrations of glutamine in patients admitted in the Department of Intensive Care. METHODS: Following randomization, glutamine concentration was determined in endoscopically sampled duodenal biopsies and plasma, before and after a 7-day period of continuous administration of the designated solution. RESULTS: The mucosal concentration of glutamine increased in the duodenal biopsies sampled from patients randomized to the solution containing the glutamine-rich proteins (from 3.6 ± 2.2 to 6.7 ± 5.2 micro-mol/g protein), but not from the others. There were no differences between the 3 groups in the plasma concentrations of glutamine, which remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: The source of supplemental glutamine can influence gut mucosal glutamine concentrations, suggesting differences in its availability or utilization. BioMed Central 2003-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC270008/ /pubmed/14613506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-2-13 Text en Copyright © 2003 Preiser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research
Preiser, Jean-Charles
Peres-Bota, Daliana
Eisendrath, Pierre
Vincent, Jean-Louis
Van Gossum, André
Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
title Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
title_full Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
title_fullStr Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
title_short Gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
title_sort gut mucosal and plasma concentrations of glutamine: a comparison between two enriched enteral feeding solutions in critically ill patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-2-13
work_keys_str_mv AT preiserjeancharles gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients
AT peresbotadaliana gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients
AT eisendrathpierre gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients
AT vincentjeanlouis gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients
AT vangossumandre gutmucosalandplasmaconcentrationsofglutamineacomparisonbetweentwoenrichedenteralfeedingsolutionsincriticallyillpatients