Cargando…

A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials

Several grafting materials have been used in sinus augmentation procedures including autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA), hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), anorganic deproteinized bovine bone and combination of these and others. Up to now a subject of controversy i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Handschel, Jörg, Simonowska, Melani, Naujoks, Christian, Depprich, Rita A, Ommerborn, Michelle A, Meyer, Ulrich, Kübler, Norbert R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-12
_version_ 1782168570560512000
author Handschel, Jörg
Simonowska, Melani
Naujoks, Christian
Depprich, Rita A
Ommerborn, Michelle A
Meyer, Ulrich
Kübler, Norbert R
author_facet Handschel, Jörg
Simonowska, Melani
Naujoks, Christian
Depprich, Rita A
Ommerborn, Michelle A
Meyer, Ulrich
Kübler, Norbert R
author_sort Handschel, Jörg
collection PubMed
description Several grafting materials have been used in sinus augmentation procedures including autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA), hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), anorganic deproteinized bovine bone and combination of these and others. Up to now a subject of controversy in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry is, what is the most appropriate graft material for sinus floor augmentation. The aim of this study is to provide a body of evidence-based data regarding grafting materials in external sinus floor elevation concerning the fate of the augmented material at the histomorphological level, through a meta-analysis of the available literature. The literature searches were performed using the National Library of Medicine. The search covered all English and German literature from 1995 until 2006. For analyzing the amount of bone the parameter "Total Bone Volume" (TBV) was assessed. TBV is determined as the percentage of the section consisting of bone tissue. In a relatively early phase after implantation the autogenous bone shows the highest TBV values. Interestingly, the different TBV levels approximate during the time. After 9 months no statistically significant differences can be detected between the various grafting materials. From a clinical point of view, the use of autogenous bone is advantageous if a prosthetic rehabilitation (with functional loading) is expected within 9 months. In other cases the use of anorganic deproteinized bovine bone in combination with autogenous bone seems to be preferable. Donor side morbidity is ignored in this conclusion.
format Text
id pubmed-2700082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27000822009-06-23 A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials Handschel, Jörg Simonowska, Melani Naujoks, Christian Depprich, Rita A Ommerborn, Michelle A Meyer, Ulrich Kübler, Norbert R Head Face Med Review Several grafting materials have been used in sinus augmentation procedures including autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA), hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), anorganic deproteinized bovine bone and combination of these and others. Up to now a subject of controversy in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry is, what is the most appropriate graft material for sinus floor augmentation. The aim of this study is to provide a body of evidence-based data regarding grafting materials in external sinus floor elevation concerning the fate of the augmented material at the histomorphological level, through a meta-analysis of the available literature. The literature searches were performed using the National Library of Medicine. The search covered all English and German literature from 1995 until 2006. For analyzing the amount of bone the parameter "Total Bone Volume" (TBV) was assessed. TBV is determined as the percentage of the section consisting of bone tissue. In a relatively early phase after implantation the autogenous bone shows the highest TBV values. Interestingly, the different TBV levels approximate during the time. After 9 months no statistically significant differences can be detected between the various grafting materials. From a clinical point of view, the use of autogenous bone is advantageous if a prosthetic rehabilitation (with functional loading) is expected within 9 months. In other cases the use of anorganic deproteinized bovine bone in combination with autogenous bone seems to be preferable. Donor side morbidity is ignored in this conclusion. BioMed Central 2009-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2700082/ /pubmed/19519903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-12 Text en Copyright © 2009 Handschel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Handschel, Jörg
Simonowska, Melani
Naujoks, Christian
Depprich, Rita A
Ommerborn, Michelle A
Meyer, Ulrich
Kübler, Norbert R
A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
title A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
title_full A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
title_fullStr A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
title_full_unstemmed A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
title_short A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
title_sort histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-12
work_keys_str_mv AT handscheljorg ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT simonowskamelani ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT naujokschristian ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT depprichritaa ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT ommerbornmichellea ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT meyerulrich ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT kublernorbertr ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT handscheljorg histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT simonowskamelani histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT naujokschristian histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT depprichritaa histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT ommerbornmichellea histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT meyerulrich histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials
AT kublernorbertr histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials