Cargando…
A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials
Several grafting materials have been used in sinus augmentation procedures including autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA), hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), anorganic deproteinized bovine bone and combination of these and others. Up to now a subject of controversy i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-12 |
_version_ | 1782168570560512000 |
---|---|
author | Handschel, Jörg Simonowska, Melani Naujoks, Christian Depprich, Rita A Ommerborn, Michelle A Meyer, Ulrich Kübler, Norbert R |
author_facet | Handschel, Jörg Simonowska, Melani Naujoks, Christian Depprich, Rita A Ommerborn, Michelle A Meyer, Ulrich Kübler, Norbert R |
author_sort | Handschel, Jörg |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several grafting materials have been used in sinus augmentation procedures including autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA), hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), anorganic deproteinized bovine bone and combination of these and others. Up to now a subject of controversy in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry is, what is the most appropriate graft material for sinus floor augmentation. The aim of this study is to provide a body of evidence-based data regarding grafting materials in external sinus floor elevation concerning the fate of the augmented material at the histomorphological level, through a meta-analysis of the available literature. The literature searches were performed using the National Library of Medicine. The search covered all English and German literature from 1995 until 2006. For analyzing the amount of bone the parameter "Total Bone Volume" (TBV) was assessed. TBV is determined as the percentage of the section consisting of bone tissue. In a relatively early phase after implantation the autogenous bone shows the highest TBV values. Interestingly, the different TBV levels approximate during the time. After 9 months no statistically significant differences can be detected between the various grafting materials. From a clinical point of view, the use of autogenous bone is advantageous if a prosthetic rehabilitation (with functional loading) is expected within 9 months. In other cases the use of anorganic deproteinized bovine bone in combination with autogenous bone seems to be preferable. Donor side morbidity is ignored in this conclusion. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2700082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27000822009-06-23 A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials Handschel, Jörg Simonowska, Melani Naujoks, Christian Depprich, Rita A Ommerborn, Michelle A Meyer, Ulrich Kübler, Norbert R Head Face Med Review Several grafting materials have been used in sinus augmentation procedures including autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA), hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), anorganic deproteinized bovine bone and combination of these and others. Up to now a subject of controversy in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry is, what is the most appropriate graft material for sinus floor augmentation. The aim of this study is to provide a body of evidence-based data regarding grafting materials in external sinus floor elevation concerning the fate of the augmented material at the histomorphological level, through a meta-analysis of the available literature. The literature searches were performed using the National Library of Medicine. The search covered all English and German literature from 1995 until 2006. For analyzing the amount of bone the parameter "Total Bone Volume" (TBV) was assessed. TBV is determined as the percentage of the section consisting of bone tissue. In a relatively early phase after implantation the autogenous bone shows the highest TBV values. Interestingly, the different TBV levels approximate during the time. After 9 months no statistically significant differences can be detected between the various grafting materials. From a clinical point of view, the use of autogenous bone is advantageous if a prosthetic rehabilitation (with functional loading) is expected within 9 months. In other cases the use of anorganic deproteinized bovine bone in combination with autogenous bone seems to be preferable. Donor side morbidity is ignored in this conclusion. BioMed Central 2009-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2700082/ /pubmed/19519903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-12 Text en Copyright © 2009 Handschel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Handschel, Jörg Simonowska, Melani Naujoks, Christian Depprich, Rita A Ommerborn, Michelle A Meyer, Ulrich Kübler, Norbert R A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials |
title | A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials |
title_full | A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials |
title_fullStr | A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials |
title_full_unstemmed | A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials |
title_short | A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials |
title_sort | histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT handscheljorg ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT simonowskamelani ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT naujokschristian ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT depprichritaa ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT ommerbornmichellea ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT meyerulrich ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT kublernorbertr ahistomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT handscheljorg histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT simonowskamelani histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT naujokschristian histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT depprichritaa histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT ommerbornmichellea histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT meyerulrich histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials AT kublernorbertr histomorphometricmetaanalysisofsinuselevationwithvariousgraftingmaterials |