Cargando…

Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys

BACKGROUND: HIV serosurveys have become important sources of HIV prevalence estimates, but these estimates may be biased because of refusals and other forms of non-response. We investigate the effect of the post-test counseling study protocol on bias due to the refusal to be tested. METHODS: Data co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reniers, Georges, Araya, Tekebash, Berhane, Yemane, Davey, Gail, Sanders, Eduard J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-163
_version_ 1782168575404933120
author Reniers, Georges
Araya, Tekebash
Berhane, Yemane
Davey, Gail
Sanders, Eduard J
author_facet Reniers, Georges
Araya, Tekebash
Berhane, Yemane
Davey, Gail
Sanders, Eduard J
author_sort Reniers, Georges
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HIV serosurveys have become important sources of HIV prevalence estimates, but these estimates may be biased because of refusals and other forms of non-response. We investigate the effect of the post-test counseling study protocol on bias due to the refusal to be tested. METHODS: Data come from a nine-month prospective study of hospital admissions in Addis Ababa during which patients were approached for an HIV test. Patients had the choice between three consent levels: testing and post-test counseling (including the return of HIV test results), testing without post-test counseling, and total refusal. For all patients, information was collected on basic sociodemographic background characteristics as well as admission diagnosis. The three consent levels are used to mimic refusal bias in serosurveys with different post-test counseling study protocols. We first investigate the covariates of consent for testing. Second, we quantify refusal bias in HIV prevalence estimates using Heckman regression models that account for sample selection. RESULTS: Refusal to be tested positively correlates with admission diagnosis (and thus HIV status), but the magnitude of refusal bias in HIV prevalence surveys depends on the study protocol. Bias is larger when post-test counseling and the return of HIV test results is a prerequisite of study participation (compared to a protocol where test results are not returned to study participants, or, where there is an explicit provision for respondents to forego post-test counseling). We also find that consent for testing increased following the introduction of antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia. Other covariates of refusal are age (non-linear effect), gender (higher refusal rates in men), marital status (lowest refusal rates in singles), educational status (refusal rate increases with educational attainment), and counselor. CONCLUSION: The protocol for post-test counseling and the return of HIV test results to study participants is an important consideration in HIV prevalence surveys that wish to minimize refusal bias. The availability of ART is likely to reduce refusal rates.
format Text
id pubmed-2700102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27001022009-06-23 Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys Reniers, Georges Araya, Tekebash Berhane, Yemane Davey, Gail Sanders, Eduard J BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: HIV serosurveys have become important sources of HIV prevalence estimates, but these estimates may be biased because of refusals and other forms of non-response. We investigate the effect of the post-test counseling study protocol on bias due to the refusal to be tested. METHODS: Data come from a nine-month prospective study of hospital admissions in Addis Ababa during which patients were approached for an HIV test. Patients had the choice between three consent levels: testing and post-test counseling (including the return of HIV test results), testing without post-test counseling, and total refusal. For all patients, information was collected on basic sociodemographic background characteristics as well as admission diagnosis. The three consent levels are used to mimic refusal bias in serosurveys with different post-test counseling study protocols. We first investigate the covariates of consent for testing. Second, we quantify refusal bias in HIV prevalence estimates using Heckman regression models that account for sample selection. RESULTS: Refusal to be tested positively correlates with admission diagnosis (and thus HIV status), but the magnitude of refusal bias in HIV prevalence surveys depends on the study protocol. Bias is larger when post-test counseling and the return of HIV test results is a prerequisite of study participation (compared to a protocol where test results are not returned to study participants, or, where there is an explicit provision for respondents to forego post-test counseling). We also find that consent for testing increased following the introduction of antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia. Other covariates of refusal are age (non-linear effect), gender (higher refusal rates in men), marital status (lowest refusal rates in singles), educational status (refusal rate increases with educational attainment), and counselor. CONCLUSION: The protocol for post-test counseling and the return of HIV test results to study participants is an important consideration in HIV prevalence surveys that wish to minimize refusal bias. The availability of ART is likely to reduce refusal rates. BioMed Central 2009-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2700102/ /pubmed/19476618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-163 Text en Copyright © 2009 Reniers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reniers, Georges
Araya, Tekebash
Berhane, Yemane
Davey, Gail
Sanders, Eduard J
Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys
title Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys
title_full Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys
title_fullStr Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys
title_full_unstemmed Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys
title_short Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys
title_sort implications of the hiv testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveys
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-163
work_keys_str_mv AT reniersgeorges implicationsofthehivtestingprotocolforrefusalbiasinseroprevalencesurveys
AT arayatekebash implicationsofthehivtestingprotocolforrefusalbiasinseroprevalencesurveys
AT berhaneyemane implicationsofthehivtestingprotocolforrefusalbiasinseroprevalencesurveys
AT daveygail implicationsofthehivtestingprotocolforrefusalbiasinseroprevalencesurveys
AT sanderseduardj implicationsofthehivtestingprotocolforrefusalbiasinseroprevalencesurveys