Cargando…

Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling

BACKGROUND: For more than a decade, microarrays have been a powerful and widely used tool to explore the transcriptome of biological systems. However, the amount of biological material from cell sorting or laser capture microdissection is much too small to perform microarray studies. To address this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clément-Ziza, Mathieu, Gentien, David, Lyonnet, Stanislas, Thiery, Jean-Paul, Besmond, Claude, Decraene, Charles
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19470167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-246
_version_ 1782168582102188032
author Clément-Ziza, Mathieu
Gentien, David
Lyonnet, Stanislas
Thiery, Jean-Paul
Besmond, Claude
Decraene, Charles
author_facet Clément-Ziza, Mathieu
Gentien, David
Lyonnet, Stanislas
Thiery, Jean-Paul
Besmond, Claude
Decraene, Charles
author_sort Clément-Ziza, Mathieu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For more than a decade, microarrays have been a powerful and widely used tool to explore the transcriptome of biological systems. However, the amount of biological material from cell sorting or laser capture microdissection is much too small to perform microarray studies. To address this issue, RNA amplification methods have been developed to generate sufficient targets from picogram amounts of total RNA to perform microarray hybridisation. RESULTS: In this study, four commercial protocols for amplification of picograms amounts of input RNA for microarray expression profiling were evaluated and compared. The quantitative and qualitative performances of the methods were assessed. Microarrays were hybridised with the amplified targets and the amplification protocols were compared with respect to the quality of expression profiles, reproducibility within a concentration range of input RNA, and sensitivity. The results demonstrate significant differences between these four methods. CONCLUSION: In our hands, the WT-Ovation pico system proposed by Nugen appears to be the most suitable for RNA amplification. This comparative study will be useful to scientists needing to choose an amplification method to carry out microarray experiments involving samples comprising only a few cells and generating picogram amounts of RNA.
format Text
id pubmed-2700135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27001352009-06-23 Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling Clément-Ziza, Mathieu Gentien, David Lyonnet, Stanislas Thiery, Jean-Paul Besmond, Claude Decraene, Charles BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: For more than a decade, microarrays have been a powerful and widely used tool to explore the transcriptome of biological systems. However, the amount of biological material from cell sorting or laser capture microdissection is much too small to perform microarray studies. To address this issue, RNA amplification methods have been developed to generate sufficient targets from picogram amounts of total RNA to perform microarray hybridisation. RESULTS: In this study, four commercial protocols for amplification of picograms amounts of input RNA for microarray expression profiling were evaluated and compared. The quantitative and qualitative performances of the methods were assessed. Microarrays were hybridised with the amplified targets and the amplification protocols were compared with respect to the quality of expression profiles, reproducibility within a concentration range of input RNA, and sensitivity. The results demonstrate significant differences between these four methods. CONCLUSION: In our hands, the WT-Ovation pico system proposed by Nugen appears to be the most suitable for RNA amplification. This comparative study will be useful to scientists needing to choose an amplification method to carry out microarray experiments involving samples comprising only a few cells and generating picogram amounts of RNA. BioMed Central 2009-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2700135/ /pubmed/19470167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-246 Text en Copyright © 2009 Clément-Ziza et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Clément-Ziza, Mathieu
Gentien, David
Lyonnet, Stanislas
Thiery, Jean-Paul
Besmond, Claude
Decraene, Charles
Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling
title Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling
title_full Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling
title_fullStr Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling
title_short Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling
title_sort evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total rna for whole genome expression profiling
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19470167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-246
work_keys_str_mv AT clementzizamathieu evaluationofmethodsforamplificationofpicogramamountsoftotalrnaforwholegenomeexpressionprofiling
AT gentiendavid evaluationofmethodsforamplificationofpicogramamountsoftotalrnaforwholegenomeexpressionprofiling
AT lyonnetstanislas evaluationofmethodsforamplificationofpicogramamountsoftotalrnaforwholegenomeexpressionprofiling
AT thieryjeanpaul evaluationofmethodsforamplificationofpicogramamountsoftotalrnaforwholegenomeexpressionprofiling
AT besmondclaude evaluationofmethodsforamplificationofpicogramamountsoftotalrnaforwholegenomeexpressionprofiling
AT decraenecharles evaluationofmethodsforamplificationofpicogramamountsoftotalrnaforwholegenomeexpressionprofiling