Cargando…

Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians

BACKGROUND: Email is the most important mechanism introduced since the telephone for developing interpersonal relationships. This study was designed to provide insight into how patients are using email to request information or services from their healthcare providers. METHODS: Following IRB approva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sittig, Dean F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14519206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-3-11
_version_ 1782121014189096960
author Sittig, Dean F
author_facet Sittig, Dean F
author_sort Sittig, Dean F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Email is the most important mechanism introduced since the telephone for developing interpersonal relationships. This study was designed to provide insight into how patients are using email to request information or services from their healthcare providers. METHODS: Following IRB approval, we reviewed all electronic mail (e-mail) messages sent between five study clinicians and their patients over a one-month period. We used a previously described taxonomy of patient requests to categorize all patient requests contained in the messages. We measured message volume, frequency, length and response time for all messages sent to and received by these clinicians. RESULTS: On average the 5 physicians involved in this study received 40 messages per month, each containing approximately 139 words. Replies sent by the physicians contained 39 words on average and 59.4% of them were sent within 24 hours. Patients averaged 1 request per message. Requests for information on medications or treatments, specific symptoms or diseases, and requests for actions regarding medications or treatments accounted for 75% of all requests. Physicians fulfilled 80.2% of all these requests. Upon comparison of these data to that obtained from traditional office visits, it appears that the potential exists for email encounters to substitute for some percentage of office visits. CONCLUSION: Electronic messaging is an important method for physicians and patients to communicate and further develop their relationship. While many physicians worry that either the number or length of messages from their patients will overwhelm them, there is no evidence to support this. In fact, the evidence suggests that many patient requests, formerly made over the telephone or during office visits, can be addressed via email thus potentially saving both patients and physicians time.
format Text
id pubmed-270029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-2700292003-11-21 Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians Sittig, Dean F BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Email is the most important mechanism introduced since the telephone for developing interpersonal relationships. This study was designed to provide insight into how patients are using email to request information or services from their healthcare providers. METHODS: Following IRB approval, we reviewed all electronic mail (e-mail) messages sent between five study clinicians and their patients over a one-month period. We used a previously described taxonomy of patient requests to categorize all patient requests contained in the messages. We measured message volume, frequency, length and response time for all messages sent to and received by these clinicians. RESULTS: On average the 5 physicians involved in this study received 40 messages per month, each containing approximately 139 words. Replies sent by the physicians contained 39 words on average and 59.4% of them were sent within 24 hours. Patients averaged 1 request per message. Requests for information on medications or treatments, specific symptoms or diseases, and requests for actions regarding medications or treatments accounted for 75% of all requests. Physicians fulfilled 80.2% of all these requests. Upon comparison of these data to that obtained from traditional office visits, it appears that the potential exists for email encounters to substitute for some percentage of office visits. CONCLUSION: Electronic messaging is an important method for physicians and patients to communicate and further develop their relationship. While many physicians worry that either the number or length of messages from their patients will overwhelm them, there is no evidence to support this. In fact, the evidence suggests that many patient requests, formerly made over the telephone or during office visits, can be addressed via email thus potentially saving both patients and physicians time. BioMed Central 2003-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC270029/ /pubmed/14519206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-3-11 Text en Copyright © 2003 Sittig; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sittig, Dean F
Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians
title Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians
title_full Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians
title_fullStr Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians
title_full_unstemmed Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians
title_short Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians
title_sort results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14519206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-3-11
work_keys_str_mv AT sittigdeanf resultsofacontentanalysisofelectronicmessagesemailsentbetweenpatientsandtheirphysicians