Cargando…

Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test

PURPOSE: Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lababidi, H., Hijaoui, A., Zarzour, M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19561904
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.39635
_version_ 1782168613551079424
author Lababidi, H.
Hijaoui, A.
Zarzour, M.
author_facet Lababidi, H.
Hijaoui, A.
Zarzour, M.
author_sort Lababidi, H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialists. Spirometry was obtained. The asthma specialist rated asthma control using a 5-point scale and indicated modification in management as step up, same or step down of asthma treatment. RESULTS: 40 patients completed the study, the mean age was 32.6 + 14.0 years, mean FEV1 was 2.7 + 1.0 L (89.2% + 23.6% of predicted). The mean ACT score was 15.9 + 5.8; mean of specialist asthma control rating was 3.4 + 1.0. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT survey was alpha = 0.92. The correlation was moderate between ACT and specialists rating (r = 0.482, P = 0.002) and between ACT and treatment modification (r = −0.350, P = 0.027). The correlation between FEV1 and ACT was low (r = 0.185, P = 0.259). ACT distinguished between patients with different specialist rating (F = 3.37, P = 0.02) and the need to change therapy (F = 3.62, P = 0.037). The areas under the curve (ROC) for ACT, FEV1, and ACT and FEV1 as independent variables were 0.720, 0.721, and 0.766 respectively. All results were comparable to the initial work for development of ACT. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool to assess asthma control. ACT correlates better with asthma specialist rating of asthma control than with FEV1.
format Text
id pubmed-2700459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27004592009-06-25 Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test Lababidi, H. Hijaoui, A. Zarzour, M. Ann Thorac Med Original Article PURPOSE: Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialists. Spirometry was obtained. The asthma specialist rated asthma control using a 5-point scale and indicated modification in management as step up, same or step down of asthma treatment. RESULTS: 40 patients completed the study, the mean age was 32.6 + 14.0 years, mean FEV1 was 2.7 + 1.0 L (89.2% + 23.6% of predicted). The mean ACT score was 15.9 + 5.8; mean of specialist asthma control rating was 3.4 + 1.0. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT survey was alpha = 0.92. The correlation was moderate between ACT and specialists rating (r = 0.482, P = 0.002) and between ACT and treatment modification (r = −0.350, P = 0.027). The correlation between FEV1 and ACT was low (r = 0.185, P = 0.259). ACT distinguished between patients with different specialist rating (F = 3.37, P = 0.02) and the need to change therapy (F = 3.62, P = 0.037). The areas under the curve (ROC) for ACT, FEV1, and ACT and FEV1 as independent variables were 0.720, 0.721, and 0.766 respectively. All results were comparable to the initial work for development of ACT. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool to assess asthma control. ACT correlates better with asthma specialist rating of asthma control than with FEV1. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2700459/ /pubmed/19561904 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.39635 Text en © Annals of Thoracic Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lababidi, H.
Hijaoui, A.
Zarzour, M.
Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_full Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_fullStr Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_short Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
title_sort validation of the arabic version of the asthma control test
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19561904
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.39635
work_keys_str_mv AT lababidih validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest
AT hijaouia validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest
AT zarzourm validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest