Cargando…
Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test
PURPOSE: Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialist...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19561904 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.39635 |
_version_ | 1782168613551079424 |
---|---|
author | Lababidi, H. Hijaoui, A. Zarzour, M. |
author_facet | Lababidi, H. Hijaoui, A. Zarzour, M. |
author_sort | Lababidi, H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialists. Spirometry was obtained. The asthma specialist rated asthma control using a 5-point scale and indicated modification in management as step up, same or step down of asthma treatment. RESULTS: 40 patients completed the study, the mean age was 32.6 + 14.0 years, mean FEV1 was 2.7 + 1.0 L (89.2% + 23.6% of predicted). The mean ACT score was 15.9 + 5.8; mean of specialist asthma control rating was 3.4 + 1.0. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT survey was alpha = 0.92. The correlation was moderate between ACT and specialists rating (r = 0.482, P = 0.002) and between ACT and treatment modification (r = −0.350, P = 0.027). The correlation between FEV1 and ACT was low (r = 0.185, P = 0.259). ACT distinguished between patients with different specialist rating (F = 3.37, P = 0.02) and the need to change therapy (F = 3.62, P = 0.037). The areas under the curve (ROC) for ACT, FEV1, and ACT and FEV1 as independent variables were 0.720, 0.721, and 0.766 respectively. All results were comparable to the initial work for development of ACT. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool to assess asthma control. ACT correlates better with asthma specialist rating of asthma control than with FEV1. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2700459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27004592009-06-25 Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test Lababidi, H. Hijaoui, A. Zarzour, M. Ann Thorac Med Original Article PURPOSE: Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialists. Spirometry was obtained. The asthma specialist rated asthma control using a 5-point scale and indicated modification in management as step up, same or step down of asthma treatment. RESULTS: 40 patients completed the study, the mean age was 32.6 + 14.0 years, mean FEV1 was 2.7 + 1.0 L (89.2% + 23.6% of predicted). The mean ACT score was 15.9 + 5.8; mean of specialist asthma control rating was 3.4 + 1.0. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT survey was alpha = 0.92. The correlation was moderate between ACT and specialists rating (r = 0.482, P = 0.002) and between ACT and treatment modification (r = −0.350, P = 0.027). The correlation between FEV1 and ACT was low (r = 0.185, P = 0.259). ACT distinguished between patients with different specialist rating (F = 3.37, P = 0.02) and the need to change therapy (F = 3.62, P = 0.037). The areas under the curve (ROC) for ACT, FEV1, and ACT and FEV1 as independent variables were 0.720, 0.721, and 0.766 respectively. All results were comparable to the initial work for development of ACT. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool to assess asthma control. ACT correlates better with asthma specialist rating of asthma control than with FEV1. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2700459/ /pubmed/19561904 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.39635 Text en © Annals of Thoracic Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lababidi, H. Hijaoui, A. Zarzour, M. Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test |
title | Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test |
title_full | Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test |
title_short | Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test |
title_sort | validation of the arabic version of the asthma control test |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19561904 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1737.39635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lababidih validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest AT hijaouia validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest AT zarzourm validationofthearabicversionoftheasthmacontroltest |