Cargando…

Management of Ocular Trauma in Emergency (MOTE) Trial: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether local anesthetic eye drops can be safely used for the topical anesthesia of patients with minor corneal injury who are discharged from the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: To assess whether topical 0.4% amethocaine self-administered to a maximum recommended fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ting, Joseph Y S, Barns, Kenneth J, Holmes, John L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19561949
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.44676
_version_ 1782168629232533504
author Ting, Joseph Y S
Barns, Kenneth J
Holmes, John L
author_facet Ting, Joseph Y S
Barns, Kenneth J
Holmes, John L
author_sort Ting, Joseph Y S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether local anesthetic eye drops can be safely used for the topical anesthesia of patients with minor corneal injury who are discharged from the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: To assess whether topical 0.4% amethocaine self-administered to a maximum recommended frequency of once every hour for 36–48 h is safe in the management of uncomplicated corneal injury in patients discharged from the ED. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical 0.4% amethocaine with topical normal saline. RESULTS: Forty-seven subjects were recruited, with 22 randomized to receive amethocaine and 25 to receive placebo (normal saline). Baseline characteristics, including corneal injury type, were similar in both groups. There were no significant functional or clinical adverse sequelae in the majority of enrolled patients who could be contacted at 2 weeks (17/22 for amethocaine and 21/25 for placebo). Follow-up for the primary study outcome was suboptimal, with only 7/22 from the amethocaine group and 9/25 from the saline group presenting for 36–48 h review; there was a statistically nonsignificant trend for persistence of the corneal defect in the amethocaine group as compared with the saline group (2/7 and 1/9, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with saline drops, amethocaine eye drops are not definitely safe but they are effective for topical analgesia in minor corneal injury. Until further definitive studies, topical nonsteroidal agents or long-lasting artificial tears may be preferred for the topical analgesia of minor corneal injury. Return for corneal re-evaluation will necessarily remain suboptimal in an otherwise self-limiting condition, leading to a bias even if study recruitment is good.
format Text
id pubmed-2700573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27005732009-06-25 Management of Ocular Trauma in Emergency (MOTE) Trial: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma Ting, Joseph Y S Barns, Kenneth J Holmes, John L J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether local anesthetic eye drops can be safely used for the topical anesthesia of patients with minor corneal injury who are discharged from the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: To assess whether topical 0.4% amethocaine self-administered to a maximum recommended frequency of once every hour for 36–48 h is safe in the management of uncomplicated corneal injury in patients discharged from the ED. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical 0.4% amethocaine with topical normal saline. RESULTS: Forty-seven subjects were recruited, with 22 randomized to receive amethocaine and 25 to receive placebo (normal saline). Baseline characteristics, including corneal injury type, were similar in both groups. There were no significant functional or clinical adverse sequelae in the majority of enrolled patients who could be contacted at 2 weeks (17/22 for amethocaine and 21/25 for placebo). Follow-up for the primary study outcome was suboptimal, with only 7/22 from the amethocaine group and 9/25 from the saline group presenting for 36–48 h review; there was a statistically nonsignificant trend for persistence of the corneal defect in the amethocaine group as compared with the saline group (2/7 and 1/9, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with saline drops, amethocaine eye drops are not definitely safe but they are effective for topical analgesia in minor corneal injury. Until further definitive studies, topical nonsteroidal agents or long-lasting artificial tears may be preferred for the topical analgesia of minor corneal injury. Return for corneal re-evaluation will necessarily remain suboptimal in an otherwise self-limiting condition, leading to a bias even if study recruitment is good. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2700573/ /pubmed/19561949 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.44676 Text en © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ting, Joseph Y S
Barns, Kenneth J
Holmes, John L
Management of Ocular Trauma in Emergency (MOTE) Trial: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma
title Management of Ocular Trauma in Emergency (MOTE) Trial: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma
title_full Management of Ocular Trauma in Emergency (MOTE) Trial: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma
title_fullStr Management of Ocular Trauma in Emergency (MOTE) Trial: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma
title_full_unstemmed Management of Ocular Trauma in Emergency (MOTE) Trial: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma
title_short Management of Ocular Trauma in Emergency (MOTE) Trial: A pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma
title_sort management of ocular trauma in emergency (mote) trial: a pilot randomized double-blinded trial comparing topical amethocaine with saline in the outpatient management of corneal trauma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19561949
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.44676
work_keys_str_mv AT tingjosephys managementofoculartraumainemergencymotetrialapilotrandomizeddoubleblindedtrialcomparingtopicalamethocainewithsalineintheoutpatientmanagementofcornealtrauma
AT barnskennethj managementofoculartraumainemergencymotetrialapilotrandomizeddoubleblindedtrialcomparingtopicalamethocainewithsalineintheoutpatientmanagementofcornealtrauma
AT holmesjohnl managementofoculartraumainemergencymotetrialapilotrandomizeddoubleblindedtrialcomparingtopicalamethocainewithsalineintheoutpatientmanagementofcornealtrauma