Cargando…
Correction: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?
Autores principales: | Baker, Stuart G, Kramer, Barnett S |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270061/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-23 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?
por: Baker, Stuart G, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
The fallacy of enrolling only high-risk subjects in cancer prevention trials: Is there a "free lunch"?
por: Baker, Stuart G, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Correction to: Efficient iterative Hi-C scaffolder based on N-best neighbors
por: Guan, Dengfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Dismissing the fallacies of childhood eczema management: case scenarios and an overview of best practices
por: Hon, Kam Lun, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The best of B.B. King
por: King, B. B.
Publicado: (1983)