Cargando…

Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in comparison with cleavage stage embryo in a similar cohort of women. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women aged 35 or less undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangalraj, Ann M, Muthukumar, K, Aleyamma, TK, Kamath, Mohan S, George, Korula
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19562070
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.51339
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in comparison with cleavage stage embryo in a similar cohort of women. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women aged 35 or less undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. When four or more grade 1 embryos were observed on day 3, extended culture till day 5 was undertaken. This policy was compared with a cohort of women who had at least three grade 1 embryos on day 3 and who had undergone a cleavage stage embryo transfer during the time period of January 2002–December 2004. Primary outcome evaluated was implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 50 women who underwent extended culture and blastocyst transfer. Group 2 comprised of 85 women who had cleavage transfer. The implantation rate for embryos transferred in group 1 was significantly higher than that for embryos transferred on day 3 (40.16% vs 11.43%). The clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly better with blastocyst transfer as compared with cleavage stage transfer (62% vs 29.76%). Significantly fewer embryos were required for transfer at the blastocyst stage compared with day 3 transfer (2.54 vs 3.45). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, blastocyst transfer with fewer embryos can be performed with high implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. This policy could lead to a reduction in the incidence of higher-order pregnancies.