Cargando…

Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in comparison with cleavage stage embryo in a similar cohort of women. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women aged 35 or less undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangalraj, Ann M, Muthukumar, K, Aleyamma, TK, Kamath, Mohan S, George, Korula
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19562070
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.51339
_version_ 1782168650000629760
author Mangalraj, Ann M
Muthukumar, K
Aleyamma, TK
Kamath, Mohan S
George, Korula
author_facet Mangalraj, Ann M
Muthukumar, K
Aleyamma, TK
Kamath, Mohan S
George, Korula
author_sort Mangalraj, Ann M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in comparison with cleavage stage embryo in a similar cohort of women. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women aged 35 or less undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. When four or more grade 1 embryos were observed on day 3, extended culture till day 5 was undertaken. This policy was compared with a cohort of women who had at least three grade 1 embryos on day 3 and who had undergone a cleavage stage embryo transfer during the time period of January 2002–December 2004. Primary outcome evaluated was implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 50 women who underwent extended culture and blastocyst transfer. Group 2 comprised of 85 women who had cleavage transfer. The implantation rate for embryos transferred in group 1 was significantly higher than that for embryos transferred on day 3 (40.16% vs 11.43%). The clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly better with blastocyst transfer as compared with cleavage stage transfer (62% vs 29.76%). Significantly fewer embryos were required for transfer at the blastocyst stage compared with day 3 transfer (2.54 vs 3.45). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, blastocyst transfer with fewer embryos can be performed with high implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. This policy could lead to a reduction in the incidence of higher-order pregnancies.
format Text
id pubmed-2700692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27006922009-06-25 Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer Mangalraj, Ann M Muthukumar, K Aleyamma, TK Kamath, Mohan S George, Korula J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in comparison with cleavage stage embryo in a similar cohort of women. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women aged 35 or less undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. When four or more grade 1 embryos were observed on day 3, extended culture till day 5 was undertaken. This policy was compared with a cohort of women who had at least three grade 1 embryos on day 3 and who had undergone a cleavage stage embryo transfer during the time period of January 2002–December 2004. Primary outcome evaluated was implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 50 women who underwent extended culture and blastocyst transfer. Group 2 comprised of 85 women who had cleavage transfer. The implantation rate for embryos transferred in group 1 was significantly higher than that for embryos transferred on day 3 (40.16% vs 11.43%). The clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly better with blastocyst transfer as compared with cleavage stage transfer (62% vs 29.76%). Significantly fewer embryos were required for transfer at the blastocyst stage compared with day 3 transfer (2.54 vs 3.45). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, blastocyst transfer with fewer embryos can be performed with high implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. This policy could lead to a reduction in the incidence of higher-order pregnancies. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2700692/ /pubmed/19562070 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.51339 Text en © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mangalraj, Ann M
Muthukumar, K
Aleyamma, TK
Kamath, Mohan S
George, Korula
Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer
title Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer
title_full Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer
title_fullStr Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer
title_full_unstemmed Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer
title_short Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer
title_sort blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19562070
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.51339
work_keys_str_mv AT mangalrajannm blastocyststagetransfervscleavagestageembryotransfer
AT muthukumark blastocyststagetransfervscleavagestageembryotransfer
AT aleyammatk blastocyststagetransfervscleavagestageembryotransfer
AT kamathmohans blastocyststagetransfervscleavagestageembryotransfer
AT georgekorula blastocyststagetransfervscleavagestageembryotransfer