Cargando…

Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the dosimetric differences between Superposition/Convolution (SC) and Monte Carlo (MC) calculated dose distributions for simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to experimental (film) measurements and the implicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dogan, Nesrin, Mihaylov, Ivaylo, Wu, Yan, Keall, Paul J, Siebers, Jeffrey V, Hagan, Michael P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2701954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19527515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-18
_version_ 1782168725347106816
author Dogan, Nesrin
Mihaylov, Ivaylo
Wu, Yan
Keall, Paul J
Siebers, Jeffrey V
Hagan, Michael P
author_facet Dogan, Nesrin
Mihaylov, Ivaylo
Wu, Yan
Keall, Paul J
Siebers, Jeffrey V
Hagan, Michael P
author_sort Dogan, Nesrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the dosimetric differences between Superposition/Convolution (SC) and Monte Carlo (MC) calculated dose distributions for simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to experimental (film) measurements and the implications for clinical treatments. METHODS: Twenty-two prostate patients treated with an in-house SIB-IMRT protocol were selected. SC-based plans used for treatment were re-evaluated with EGS4-based MC calculations for treatment verification. Accuracy was evaluated with-respect-to film-based dosimetry. Comparisons used gamma (γ)-index, distance-to-agreement (DTA), and superimposed dose distributions. The treatment plans were also compared based on dose-volume indices and 3-D γ index for targets and critical structures. RESULTS: Flat-phantom comparisons demonstrated that the MC algorithm predicted measurements better than the SC algorithm. The average PTV(prostate )D(98 )agreement between SC and MC was 1.2% ± 1.1. For rectum, the average differences in SC and MC calculated D(50 )ranged from -3.6% to 3.4%. For small bowel, there were up to 30.2% ± 40.7 (range: 0.2%, 115%) differences between SC and MC calculated average D(50 )index. For femurs, the differences in average D(50 )reached up to 8.6% ± 3.6 (range: 1.2%, 14.5%). For PTV(prostate )and PTV(nodes), the average gamma scores were >95.0%. CONCLUSION: MC agrees better with film measurements than SC. Although, on average, SC-calculated doses agreed with MC calculations within the targets within 2%, there were deviations up to 5% for some patient's treatment plans. For some patients, the magnitude of such deviations might decrease the intended target dose levels that are required for the treatment protocol, placing the patients in different dose levels that do not satisfy the protocol dose requirements.
format Text
id pubmed-2701954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27019542009-06-26 Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy Dogan, Nesrin Mihaylov, Ivaylo Wu, Yan Keall, Paul J Siebers, Jeffrey V Hagan, Michael P Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the dosimetric differences between Superposition/Convolution (SC) and Monte Carlo (MC) calculated dose distributions for simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to experimental (film) measurements and the implications for clinical treatments. METHODS: Twenty-two prostate patients treated with an in-house SIB-IMRT protocol were selected. SC-based plans used for treatment were re-evaluated with EGS4-based MC calculations for treatment verification. Accuracy was evaluated with-respect-to film-based dosimetry. Comparisons used gamma (γ)-index, distance-to-agreement (DTA), and superimposed dose distributions. The treatment plans were also compared based on dose-volume indices and 3-D γ index for targets and critical structures. RESULTS: Flat-phantom comparisons demonstrated that the MC algorithm predicted measurements better than the SC algorithm. The average PTV(prostate )D(98 )agreement between SC and MC was 1.2% ± 1.1. For rectum, the average differences in SC and MC calculated D(50 )ranged from -3.6% to 3.4%. For small bowel, there were up to 30.2% ± 40.7 (range: 0.2%, 115%) differences between SC and MC calculated average D(50 )index. For femurs, the differences in average D(50 )reached up to 8.6% ± 3.6 (range: 1.2%, 14.5%). For PTV(prostate )and PTV(nodes), the average gamma scores were >95.0%. CONCLUSION: MC agrees better with film measurements than SC. Although, on average, SC-calculated doses agreed with MC calculations within the targets within 2%, there were deviations up to 5% for some patient's treatment plans. For some patients, the magnitude of such deviations might decrease the intended target dose levels that are required for the treatment protocol, placing the patients in different dose levels that do not satisfy the protocol dose requirements. BioMed Central 2009-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2701954/ /pubmed/19527515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-18 Text en Copyright © 2009 Dogan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Dogan, Nesrin
Mihaylov, Ivaylo
Wu, Yan
Keall, Paul J
Siebers, Jeffrey V
Hagan, Michael P
Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy
title Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy
title_full Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy
title_fullStr Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy
title_short Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy
title_sort monte carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2701954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19527515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-18
work_keys_str_mv AT dogannesrin montecarlodoseverificationofprostatepatientstreatedwithsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT mihaylovivaylo montecarlodoseverificationofprostatepatientstreatedwithsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT wuyan montecarlodoseverificationofprostatepatientstreatedwithsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT keallpaulj montecarlodoseverificationofprostatepatientstreatedwithsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT siebersjeffreyv montecarlodoseverificationofprostatepatientstreatedwithsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT haganmichaelp montecarlodoseverificationofprostatepatientstreatedwithsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy