Cargando…

An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations

The Canadian poultry production industry contributes nearly $10 billion to the Canadian economy and employs nearly 50,000 workers. However, modern poultry facilities are highly contaminated with airborne dust. Although there are many bioaerosols in the poultry barn environment, endotoxin is typicall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Just, Natasha, Duchaine, Caroline, Singh, Baljit
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2701955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19515256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-4-13
_version_ 1782168725580939264
author Just, Natasha
Duchaine, Caroline
Singh, Baljit
author_facet Just, Natasha
Duchaine, Caroline
Singh, Baljit
author_sort Just, Natasha
collection PubMed
description The Canadian poultry production industry contributes nearly $10 billion to the Canadian economy and employs nearly 50,000 workers. However, modern poultry facilities are highly contaminated with airborne dust. Although there are many bioaerosols in the poultry barn environment, endotoxin is typically attributed with the negative respiratory symptoms observed in workers. These adverse respiratory symptoms have a higher prevalence in poultry workers compared to workers from other animal confinement buildings. Workers in cage-housed operations compared to floor-housed facilities report a higher prevalence of some respiratory symptoms. We review the current state of knowledge on airborne dust in poultry barns and respiratory dysfunction in poultry workers while highlighting the areas that need further investigation. Our review focuses on the aerobiological pathway of poultry dust including the source and aerosolization of dust and worker exposure and response. Further understanding of the source and aerosolization of dust in poultry operations will aid in the development of management practices to reduce worker exposure and response.
format Text
id pubmed-2701955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27019552009-06-26 An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations Just, Natasha Duchaine, Caroline Singh, Baljit J Occup Med Toxicol Review The Canadian poultry production industry contributes nearly $10 billion to the Canadian economy and employs nearly 50,000 workers. However, modern poultry facilities are highly contaminated with airborne dust. Although there are many bioaerosols in the poultry barn environment, endotoxin is typically attributed with the negative respiratory symptoms observed in workers. These adverse respiratory symptoms have a higher prevalence in poultry workers compared to workers from other animal confinement buildings. Workers in cage-housed operations compared to floor-housed facilities report a higher prevalence of some respiratory symptoms. We review the current state of knowledge on airborne dust in poultry barns and respiratory dysfunction in poultry workers while highlighting the areas that need further investigation. Our review focuses on the aerobiological pathway of poultry dust including the source and aerosolization of dust and worker exposure and response. Further understanding of the source and aerosolization of dust in poultry operations will aid in the development of management practices to reduce worker exposure and response. BioMed Central 2009-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2701955/ /pubmed/19515256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-4-13 Text en Copyright © 2009 Just et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Just, Natasha
Duchaine, Caroline
Singh, Baljit
An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations
title An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations
title_full An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations
title_fullStr An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations
title_full_unstemmed An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations
title_short An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations
title_sort aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2701955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19515256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-4-13
work_keys_str_mv AT justnatasha anaerobiologicalperspectiveofdustincagehousedandfloorhousedpoultryoperations
AT duchainecaroline anaerobiologicalperspectiveofdustincagehousedandfloorhousedpoultryoperations
AT singhbaljit anaerobiologicalperspectiveofdustincagehousedandfloorhousedpoultryoperations
AT justnatasha aerobiologicalperspectiveofdustincagehousedandfloorhousedpoultryoperations
AT duchainecaroline aerobiologicalperspectiveofdustincagehousedandfloorhousedpoultryoperations
AT singhbaljit aerobiologicalperspectiveofdustincagehousedandfloorhousedpoultryoperations