Cargando…

MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome

BACKGROUND: To diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS), evidence for dissemination in space and time is required. There is no clear definition on how symptoms and signs of a patient indicate clinical dissemination in space. To provide a uniform approach on this subject, a clinical classification system was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Jessica M, Pohl, Christoph, Polman, Chris H, Barkhof, Frederik, Freedman, Mark S, Edan, Gilles, Miller, David H, Bauer, Lars, Sandbrink, Rupert, Kappos, Ludwig, Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19457248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-19
_version_ 1782168766865473536
author Nielsen, Jessica M
Pohl, Christoph
Polman, Chris H
Barkhof, Frederik
Freedman, Mark S
Edan, Gilles
Miller, David H
Bauer, Lars
Sandbrink, Rupert
Kappos, Ludwig
Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ
author_facet Nielsen, Jessica M
Pohl, Christoph
Polman, Chris H
Barkhof, Frederik
Freedman, Mark S
Edan, Gilles
Miller, David H
Bauer, Lars
Sandbrink, Rupert
Kappos, Ludwig
Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ
author_sort Nielsen, Jessica M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS), evidence for dissemination in space and time is required. There is no clear definition on how symptoms and signs of a patient indicate clinical dissemination in space. To provide a uniform approach on this subject, a clinical classification system was described recently differentiating patients with mono- and multifocal clinical presentation. Here we assess the predictive value of clinically defined dissemination in space at first presentation for time to clinically definite MS (CDMS). METHODS: Four hundred and sixty-eight patients with a first episode suggestive of MS were classified as clinically mono- or multifocal by two neurologists blinded to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results. These patients were part of the BENEFIT study in which 292 patients were randomized to interferon beta-1b (IFNB-1b) and 176 to placebo. By using Kaplan-Meier statistics the risk for CDMS was studied in mono- and multifocal patients of the placebo group, both with and without taking into account MRI measures of potential prognostic relevance. RESULTS: Time to CDMS was similar in monofocal and multifocal patients. In monofocal patients, the risk for CDMS over 2 years was significantly higher when ≥ 9 T2 lesions or at least one Gd-enhancing lesion were present at the first event or 3 or 6 months after the first event. In patients with multifocal presentation, these MRI measures had no significant added value in predicting time to CDMS. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that a carefully performed neurological assessment of symptoms and signs, combined with lesions on MRI, is important for defining the risk of conversion to CDMS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Benefit trial has been registered under NCT00185211
format Text
id pubmed-2702360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27023602009-06-27 MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome Nielsen, Jessica M Pohl, Christoph Polman, Chris H Barkhof, Frederik Freedman, Mark S Edan, Gilles Miller, David H Bauer, Lars Sandbrink, Rupert Kappos, Ludwig Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: To diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS), evidence for dissemination in space and time is required. There is no clear definition on how symptoms and signs of a patient indicate clinical dissemination in space. To provide a uniform approach on this subject, a clinical classification system was described recently differentiating patients with mono- and multifocal clinical presentation. Here we assess the predictive value of clinically defined dissemination in space at first presentation for time to clinically definite MS (CDMS). METHODS: Four hundred and sixty-eight patients with a first episode suggestive of MS were classified as clinically mono- or multifocal by two neurologists blinded to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results. These patients were part of the BENEFIT study in which 292 patients were randomized to interferon beta-1b (IFNB-1b) and 176 to placebo. By using Kaplan-Meier statistics the risk for CDMS was studied in mono- and multifocal patients of the placebo group, both with and without taking into account MRI measures of potential prognostic relevance. RESULTS: Time to CDMS was similar in monofocal and multifocal patients. In monofocal patients, the risk for CDMS over 2 years was significantly higher when ≥ 9 T2 lesions or at least one Gd-enhancing lesion were present at the first event or 3 or 6 months after the first event. In patients with multifocal presentation, these MRI measures had no significant added value in predicting time to CDMS. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that a carefully performed neurological assessment of symptoms and signs, combined with lesions on MRI, is important for defining the risk of conversion to CDMS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Benefit trial has been registered under NCT00185211 BioMed Central 2009-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2702360/ /pubmed/19457248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-19 Text en Copyright © 2009 Nielsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nielsen, Jessica M
Pohl, Christoph
Polman, Chris H
Barkhof, Frederik
Freedman, Mark S
Edan, Gilles
Miller, David H
Bauer, Lars
Sandbrink, Rupert
Kappos, Ludwig
Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ
MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome
title MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome
title_full MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome
title_fullStr MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome
title_full_unstemmed MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome
title_short MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome
title_sort mri characteristics are predictive for cdms in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19457248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-19
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenjessicam mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT pohlchristoph mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT polmanchrish mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT barkhoffrederik mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT freedmanmarks mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT edangilles mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT millerdavidh mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT bauerlars mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT sandbrinkrupert mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT kapposludwig mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome
AT uitdehaagbernardmj mricharacteristicsarepredictiveforcdmsinmonofocalbutnotinmultifocalpatientswithaclinicallyisolatedsyndrome