Cargando…

In situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND: New, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have proven comparable or superior to the anti-estrogen tamoxifen for treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive breast cancer. AIs suppress total body and intratumoral estrogen levels. It is unclear whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lykkesfeldt, Anne E, Henriksen, Katrine L, Rasmussen, Birgitte B, Sasano, Hironobu, Evans, Dean B, Møller, Susanne, Ejlertsen, Bent, Mouridsen, Henning T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19531212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-185
_version_ 1782168774436192256
author Lykkesfeldt, Anne E
Henriksen, Katrine L
Rasmussen, Birgitte B
Sasano, Hironobu
Evans, Dean B
Møller, Susanne
Ejlertsen, Bent
Mouridsen, Henning T
author_facet Lykkesfeldt, Anne E
Henriksen, Katrine L
Rasmussen, Birgitte B
Sasano, Hironobu
Evans, Dean B
Møller, Susanne
Ejlertsen, Bent
Mouridsen, Henning T
author_sort Lykkesfeldt, Anne E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have proven comparable or superior to the anti-estrogen tamoxifen for treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive breast cancer. AIs suppress total body and intratumoral estrogen levels. It is unclear whether in situ carcinoma cell aromatization is the primary source of estrogen production for tumor growth and whether the aromatase expression is predictive of response to endocrine therapy. Due to methodological difficulties in the determination of the aromatase protein, COX-2, an enzyme involved in the synthesis of aromatase, has been suggested as a surrogate marker for aromatase expression. METHODS: Primary tumor material was retrospectively collected from 88 patients who participated in a randomized clinical trial comparing the AI letrozole to the anti-estrogen tamoxifen for first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. Semi-quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was performed for ER, PR, COX-2 and aromatase using Tissue Microarrays (TMAs). Aromatase was also analyzed using whole sections (WS). Kappa analysis was applied to compare association of protein expression levels. Univariate Wilcoxon analysis and the Cox-analysis were performed to evaluate time to progression (TTP) in relation to marker expression. RESULTS: Aromatase expression was associated with ER, but not with PR or COX-2 expression in carcinoma cells. Measurements of aromatase in WS were not comparable to results from TMAs. Expression of COX-2 and aromatase did not predict response to endocrine therapy. Aromatase in combination with high PR expression may select letrozole treated patients with a longer TTP. CONCLUSION: TMAs are not suitable for IHC analysis of in situ aromatase expression and we did not find COX-2 expression in carcinoma cells to be a surrogate marker for aromatase. In situ aromatase expression in tumor cells is associated with ER expression and may thus point towards good prognosis. Aromatase expression in cancer cells is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy, indicating that in situ estrogen synthesis may not be the major source of intratumoral estrogen. However, aromatase expression in combination with high PR expression may select letrozole treated patients with longer TTP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Sub-study of trial P025 for advanced breast cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-2702392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27023922009-06-27 In situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer Lykkesfeldt, Anne E Henriksen, Katrine L Rasmussen, Birgitte B Sasano, Hironobu Evans, Dean B Møller, Susanne Ejlertsen, Bent Mouridsen, Henning T BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: New, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have proven comparable or superior to the anti-estrogen tamoxifen for treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive breast cancer. AIs suppress total body and intratumoral estrogen levels. It is unclear whether in situ carcinoma cell aromatization is the primary source of estrogen production for tumor growth and whether the aromatase expression is predictive of response to endocrine therapy. Due to methodological difficulties in the determination of the aromatase protein, COX-2, an enzyme involved in the synthesis of aromatase, has been suggested as a surrogate marker for aromatase expression. METHODS: Primary tumor material was retrospectively collected from 88 patients who participated in a randomized clinical trial comparing the AI letrozole to the anti-estrogen tamoxifen for first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. Semi-quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was performed for ER, PR, COX-2 and aromatase using Tissue Microarrays (TMAs). Aromatase was also analyzed using whole sections (WS). Kappa analysis was applied to compare association of protein expression levels. Univariate Wilcoxon analysis and the Cox-analysis were performed to evaluate time to progression (TTP) in relation to marker expression. RESULTS: Aromatase expression was associated with ER, but not with PR or COX-2 expression in carcinoma cells. Measurements of aromatase in WS were not comparable to results from TMAs. Expression of COX-2 and aromatase did not predict response to endocrine therapy. Aromatase in combination with high PR expression may select letrozole treated patients with a longer TTP. CONCLUSION: TMAs are not suitable for IHC analysis of in situ aromatase expression and we did not find COX-2 expression in carcinoma cells to be a surrogate marker for aromatase. In situ aromatase expression in tumor cells is associated with ER expression and may thus point towards good prognosis. Aromatase expression in cancer cells is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy, indicating that in situ estrogen synthesis may not be the major source of intratumoral estrogen. However, aromatase expression in combination with high PR expression may select letrozole treated patients with longer TTP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Sub-study of trial P025 for advanced breast cancer. BioMed Central 2009-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2702392/ /pubmed/19531212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-185 Text en Copyright ©2009 Lykkesfeldt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lykkesfeldt, Anne E
Henriksen, Katrine L
Rasmussen, Birgitte B
Sasano, Hironobu
Evans, Dean B
Møller, Susanne
Ejlertsen, Bent
Mouridsen, Henning T
In situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer
title In situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer
title_full In situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer
title_fullStr In situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed In situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer
title_short In situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer
title_sort in situ aromatase expression in primary tumor is associated with estrogen receptor expression but is not predictive of response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19531212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-185
work_keys_str_mv AT lykkesfeldtannee insituaromataseexpressioninprimarytumorisassociatedwithestrogenreceptorexpressionbutisnotpredictiveofresponsetoendocrinetherapyinadvancedbreastcancer
AT henriksenkatrinel insituaromataseexpressioninprimarytumorisassociatedwithestrogenreceptorexpressionbutisnotpredictiveofresponsetoendocrinetherapyinadvancedbreastcancer
AT rasmussenbirgitteb insituaromataseexpressioninprimarytumorisassociatedwithestrogenreceptorexpressionbutisnotpredictiveofresponsetoendocrinetherapyinadvancedbreastcancer
AT sasanohironobu insituaromataseexpressioninprimarytumorisassociatedwithestrogenreceptorexpressionbutisnotpredictiveofresponsetoendocrinetherapyinadvancedbreastcancer
AT evansdeanb insituaromataseexpressioninprimarytumorisassociatedwithestrogenreceptorexpressionbutisnotpredictiveofresponsetoendocrinetherapyinadvancedbreastcancer
AT møllersusanne insituaromataseexpressioninprimarytumorisassociatedwithestrogenreceptorexpressionbutisnotpredictiveofresponsetoendocrinetherapyinadvancedbreastcancer
AT ejlertsenbent insituaromataseexpressioninprimarytumorisassociatedwithestrogenreceptorexpressionbutisnotpredictiveofresponsetoendocrinetherapyinadvancedbreastcancer
AT mouridsenhenningt insituaromataseexpressioninprimarytumorisassociatedwithestrogenreceptorexpressionbutisnotpredictiveofresponsetoendocrinetherapyinadvancedbreastcancer