Cargando…

The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: A Middle Eastern emergency department perspective

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a ubiquitous problem with serious public health implications. The fast track area is a novel method which aims to reduce waiting time, patient dissatisfaction and morbidity. |The study objective was to determine the impact of a fast track area (F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devkaran, Subashnie, Parsons, Howard, Van Dyke, Murray, Drennan, Jonathan, Rajah, Jaishen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2703617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19534787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-9-11
_version_ 1782168848827416576
author Devkaran, Subashnie
Parsons, Howard
Van Dyke, Murray
Drennan, Jonathan
Rajah, Jaishen
author_facet Devkaran, Subashnie
Parsons, Howard
Van Dyke, Murray
Drennan, Jonathan
Rajah, Jaishen
author_sort Devkaran, Subashnie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a ubiquitous problem with serious public health implications. The fast track area is a novel method which aims to reduce waiting time, patient dissatisfaction and morbidity. |The study objective was to determine the impact of a fast track area (FTA) on both effectiveness measures (i.e. waiting times [WT] and length of stay [LOS]) and quality measures (i.e. LWBS rates and mortality rates) in non-urgent patients. The secondary objective was to assess if a FTA negatively impacted on urgent patients entering the ED. METHODS: The study took place in a 500 bed, urban, tertiary care hospital in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. This was a quasi-experimental, which examined the impact of a FTA on a pre-intervention control group (January 2005) (n = 4,779) versus a post-intervention study group (January 2006) (n = 5,706). RESULTS: Mean WTs of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) 4 patients decreased by 22 min (95% CI 21 min to 24 min, P < 0.001). Similarly, mean WTs of CTAS 5 patients decreased by 28 min (95% CI 19 min to 37 min, P < 0.001) post FTA. The mean WTs of urgent patients (CTAS 2/3) were also significantly reduced after the FTA was opened (P < 0.001). The LWBS rate was reduced from 4.7% to 0.7% (95% CI 3.37 to 4.64; P < 0.001). Opening a FTA had no significant impact on mortality rates (P = 0.88). CONCLUSION: The FTA improved ED effectiveness (WTs and LOS) and quality measures (LWBS rates) whereas mortality rate remained unchanged.
format Text
id pubmed-2703617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27036172009-06-30 The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: A Middle Eastern emergency department perspective Devkaran, Subashnie Parsons, Howard Van Dyke, Murray Drennan, Jonathan Rajah, Jaishen BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a ubiquitous problem with serious public health implications. The fast track area is a novel method which aims to reduce waiting time, patient dissatisfaction and morbidity. |The study objective was to determine the impact of a fast track area (FTA) on both effectiveness measures (i.e. waiting times [WT] and length of stay [LOS]) and quality measures (i.e. LWBS rates and mortality rates) in non-urgent patients. The secondary objective was to assess if a FTA negatively impacted on urgent patients entering the ED. METHODS: The study took place in a 500 bed, urban, tertiary care hospital in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. This was a quasi-experimental, which examined the impact of a FTA on a pre-intervention control group (January 2005) (n = 4,779) versus a post-intervention study group (January 2006) (n = 5,706). RESULTS: Mean WTs of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) 4 patients decreased by 22 min (95% CI 21 min to 24 min, P < 0.001). Similarly, mean WTs of CTAS 5 patients decreased by 28 min (95% CI 19 min to 37 min, P < 0.001) post FTA. The mean WTs of urgent patients (CTAS 2/3) were also significantly reduced after the FTA was opened (P < 0.001). The LWBS rate was reduced from 4.7% to 0.7% (95% CI 3.37 to 4.64; P < 0.001). Opening a FTA had no significant impact on mortality rates (P = 0.88). CONCLUSION: The FTA improved ED effectiveness (WTs and LOS) and quality measures (LWBS rates) whereas mortality rate remained unchanged. BioMed Central 2009-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2703617/ /pubmed/19534787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-9-11 Text en Copyright © 2009 Devkaran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Devkaran, Subashnie
Parsons, Howard
Van Dyke, Murray
Drennan, Jonathan
Rajah, Jaishen
The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: A Middle Eastern emergency department perspective
title The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: A Middle Eastern emergency department perspective
title_full The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: A Middle Eastern emergency department perspective
title_fullStr The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: A Middle Eastern emergency department perspective
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: A Middle Eastern emergency department perspective
title_short The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: A Middle Eastern emergency department perspective
title_sort impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: a middle eastern emergency department perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2703617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19534787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-9-11
work_keys_str_mv AT devkaransubashnie theimpactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT parsonshoward theimpactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT vandykemurray theimpactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT drennanjonathan theimpactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT rajahjaishen theimpactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT devkaransubashnie impactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT parsonshoward impactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT vandykemurray impactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT drennanjonathan impactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective
AT rajahjaishen impactofafasttrackareaonqualityandeffectivenessoutcomesamiddleeasternemergencydepartmentperspective