Cargando…

Differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays

BACKGROUND: The latest generation of Affymetrix microarrays are designed to interrogate expression over the entire length of every locus, thus giving the opportunity to study alternative splicing genome-wide. The Exon 1.0 ST (sense target) platform, with versions for Human, Mouse and Rat, is designe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Mark D, Speed, Terence P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2703633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19463149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-156
_version_ 1782168852643184640
author Robinson, Mark D
Speed, Terence P
author_facet Robinson, Mark D
Speed, Terence P
author_sort Robinson, Mark D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The latest generation of Affymetrix microarrays are designed to interrogate expression over the entire length of every locus, thus giving the opportunity to study alternative splicing genome-wide. The Exon 1.0 ST (sense target) platform, with versions for Human, Mouse and Rat, is designed primarily to probe every known or predicted exon. The smaller Gene 1.0 ST array is designed as an expression microarray but still interrogates expression with probes along the full length of each well-characterized transcript. We explore the possibility of using the Gene 1.0 ST platform to identify differential splicing events. RESULTS: We propose a strategy to score differential splicing by using the auxiliary information from fitting the statistical model, RMA (robust multichip analysis). RMA partitions the probe-level data into probe effects and expression levels, operating robustly so that if a small number of probes behave differently than the rest, they are downweighted in the fitting step. We argue that adjacent poorly fitting probes for a given sample can be evidence of differential splicing and have designed a statistic to search for this behaviour. Using a public tissue panel dataset, we show many examples of tissue-specific alternative splicing. Furthermore, we show that evidence for putative alternative splicing has a strong correspondence between the Gene 1.0 ST and Exon 1.0 ST platforms. CONCLUSION: We propose a new approach, FIRMAGene, to search for differentially spliced genes using the Gene 1.0 ST platform. Such an analysis complements the search for differential expression. We validate the method by illustrating several known examples and we note some of the challenges in interpreting the probe-level data. Software implementing our methods is freely available as an R package.
format Text
id pubmed-2703633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27036332009-06-30 Differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays Robinson, Mark D Speed, Terence P BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The latest generation of Affymetrix microarrays are designed to interrogate expression over the entire length of every locus, thus giving the opportunity to study alternative splicing genome-wide. The Exon 1.0 ST (sense target) platform, with versions for Human, Mouse and Rat, is designed primarily to probe every known or predicted exon. The smaller Gene 1.0 ST array is designed as an expression microarray but still interrogates expression with probes along the full length of each well-characterized transcript. We explore the possibility of using the Gene 1.0 ST platform to identify differential splicing events. RESULTS: We propose a strategy to score differential splicing by using the auxiliary information from fitting the statistical model, RMA (robust multichip analysis). RMA partitions the probe-level data into probe effects and expression levels, operating robustly so that if a small number of probes behave differently than the rest, they are downweighted in the fitting step. We argue that adjacent poorly fitting probes for a given sample can be evidence of differential splicing and have designed a statistic to search for this behaviour. Using a public tissue panel dataset, we show many examples of tissue-specific alternative splicing. Furthermore, we show that evidence for putative alternative splicing has a strong correspondence between the Gene 1.0 ST and Exon 1.0 ST platforms. CONCLUSION: We propose a new approach, FIRMAGene, to search for differentially spliced genes using the Gene 1.0 ST platform. Such an analysis complements the search for differential expression. We validate the method by illustrating several known examples and we note some of the challenges in interpreting the probe-level data. Software implementing our methods is freely available as an R package. BioMed Central 2009-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2703633/ /pubmed/19463149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-156 Text en Copyright © 2009 Robinson and Speed; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Robinson, Mark D
Speed, Terence P
Differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays
title Differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays
title_full Differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays
title_fullStr Differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays
title_full_unstemmed Differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays
title_short Differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays
title_sort differential splicing using whole-transcript microarrays
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2703633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19463149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-156
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonmarkd differentialsplicingusingwholetranscriptmicroarrays
AT speedterencep differentialsplicingusingwholetranscriptmicroarrays