Cargando…
A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis
OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an ophthalmic formulation of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite(®) (AzaSite™, InSite Vision, Alameda CA, USA) and demonstrate equivalence with 0.3% tobramycin ophthalmic solution, USP, for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis as defined by...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2704516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668507 |
_version_ | 1782168934842105856 |
---|---|
author | Abelson, Mark Protzko, Eugene Shapiro, Aron Garces-Soldana, Ana Bowman, Lyle |
author_facet | Abelson, Mark Protzko, Eugene Shapiro, Aron Garces-Soldana, Ana Bowman, Lyle |
author_sort | Abelson, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an ophthalmic formulation of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite(®) (AzaSite™, InSite Vision, Alameda CA, USA) and demonstrate equivalence with 0.3% tobramycin ophthalmic solution, USP, for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis as defined by the resolution of clinical signs and the eradication of pathogens. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, active-controlled, double-masked, phase 3 trial conducted at 47 US sites between 6 August 2004 and 6 October 2005. Participants: Subjects aged 1 year or older with diagnosis of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: Bacteriologically confirmed participants received either 1% azithromycin in Dura-Site (n = 159) or tobramycin (n = 157). Masked study medications were dosed 4 times a day for 5 days. Participants in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group were dosed twice a day with active drug on days 1 and 2 and once daily on days 3 through 5. The other doses were vehicle. Clinical signs and bacterial cultures were evaluated at visit 3 (day 6 + 1). RESULTS: Clinical resolution was observed in 79.9% of participants in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group, as compared with 78.3% of those in the tobramycin group (95% CI: −7.4–10.5). Bacterial eradication was 88.1% in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group vs 94.3% in the tobramycin group (95% CI: −12.4–0.0). Analyses of resistance confirmed that 1% azithromycin in DuraSite eradicated Staphylococci and Streptococci strains that are commonly resistant to azithromycin, erythromycin, and fluoroquinolones. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite and tobramycin are equivalent; however, this formulation of azithromycin also permits effective dosing intervals of twice a day on days 1 and 2 followed by once daily on the last 3 days of therapy, for a total of 65% fewer doses. In vitro, the killing spectrum of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite appears to be enhanced relative to 1% azithromycin without DuraSite. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2704516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27045162009-08-10 A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis Abelson, Mark Protzko, Eugene Shapiro, Aron Garces-Soldana, Ana Bowman, Lyle Clin Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an ophthalmic formulation of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite(®) (AzaSite™, InSite Vision, Alameda CA, USA) and demonstrate equivalence with 0.3% tobramycin ophthalmic solution, USP, for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis as defined by the resolution of clinical signs and the eradication of pathogens. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, active-controlled, double-masked, phase 3 trial conducted at 47 US sites between 6 August 2004 and 6 October 2005. Participants: Subjects aged 1 year or older with diagnosis of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: Bacteriologically confirmed participants received either 1% azithromycin in Dura-Site (n = 159) or tobramycin (n = 157). Masked study medications were dosed 4 times a day for 5 days. Participants in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group were dosed twice a day with active drug on days 1 and 2 and once daily on days 3 through 5. The other doses were vehicle. Clinical signs and bacterial cultures were evaluated at visit 3 (day 6 + 1). RESULTS: Clinical resolution was observed in 79.9% of participants in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group, as compared with 78.3% of those in the tobramycin group (95% CI: −7.4–10.5). Bacterial eradication was 88.1% in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group vs 94.3% in the tobramycin group (95% CI: −12.4–0.0). Analyses of resistance confirmed that 1% azithromycin in DuraSite eradicated Staphylococci and Streptococci strains that are commonly resistant to azithromycin, erythromycin, and fluoroquinolones. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite and tobramycin are equivalent; however, this formulation of azithromycin also permits effective dosing intervals of twice a day on days 1 and 2 followed by once daily on the last 3 days of therapy, for a total of 65% fewer doses. In vitro, the killing spectrum of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite appears to be enhanced relative to 1% azithromycin without DuraSite. Dove Medical Press 2007-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2704516/ /pubmed/19668507 Text en © 2007 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved |
spellingShingle | Original Research Abelson, Mark Protzko, Eugene Shapiro, Aron Garces-Soldana, Ana Bowman, Lyle A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis |
title | A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis |
title_full | A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis |
title_fullStr | A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis |
title_short | A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis |
title_sort | randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2704516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668507 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abelsonmark arandomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT protzkoeugene arandomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT shapiroaron arandomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT garcessoldanaana arandomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT bowmanlyle arandomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT abelsonmark randomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT protzkoeugene randomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT shapiroaron randomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT garcessoldanaana randomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis AT bowmanlyle randomizedtrialassessingtheclinicalefficacyandmicrobialeradicationof1azithromycinophthalmicsolutionvstobramycininadultandpediatricsubjectswithbacterialconjunctivitis |