Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas
BACKGROUND: Results from previous trials suggest that daptomycin may result in faster clinical improvement than penicillinase-resistant penicillins or vancomycin for patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate whether daptomycin treatment of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2705813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19222623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01988.x |
_version_ | 1782169032065024000 |
---|---|
author | Pertel, P E Eisenstein, B I Link, A S Donfrid, B Biermann, E J A Bernardo, P Martone, W J |
author_facet | Pertel, P E Eisenstein, B I Link, A S Donfrid, B Biermann, E J A Bernardo, P Martone, W J |
author_sort | Pertel, P E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Results from previous trials suggest that daptomycin may result in faster clinical improvement than penicillinase-resistant penicillins or vancomycin for patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate whether daptomycin treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas would result in faster resolution compared with vancomycin. DESIGN: The study was a prospective, evaluator-blinded, multi-centre trial. Patients were randomised to receive daptomycin 4 mg/kg once daily or vancomycin according to standard of care for 7–14 days. PATIENTS: Adults diagnosed with cellulitis or erysipelas requiring hospitalisation and intravenous antibiotic therapy were eligible for enrolment. RESULTS: The clinical success rates were 94.0% for daptomycin and 90.2% for vancomycin (95% confidence interval for the difference, −6.7%, 14.3%). There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms in the time to resolution or improvement in any of the predefined clinical end-points. Both daptomycin and vancomycin were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the rate of resolution of cellulitis or erysipelas among patients treated with daptomycin or vancomycin. Daptomycin 4 mg/kg once daily appeared to be effective and safe for treating cellulitis or erysipelas. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2705813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27058132009-07-14 The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas Pertel, P E Eisenstein, B I Link, A S Donfrid, B Biermann, E J A Bernardo, P Martone, W J Int J Clin Pract Infection BACKGROUND: Results from previous trials suggest that daptomycin may result in faster clinical improvement than penicillinase-resistant penicillins or vancomycin for patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate whether daptomycin treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas would result in faster resolution compared with vancomycin. DESIGN: The study was a prospective, evaluator-blinded, multi-centre trial. Patients were randomised to receive daptomycin 4 mg/kg once daily or vancomycin according to standard of care for 7–14 days. PATIENTS: Adults diagnosed with cellulitis or erysipelas requiring hospitalisation and intravenous antibiotic therapy were eligible for enrolment. RESULTS: The clinical success rates were 94.0% for daptomycin and 90.2% for vancomycin (95% confidence interval for the difference, −6.7%, 14.3%). There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms in the time to resolution or improvement in any of the predefined clinical end-points. Both daptomycin and vancomycin were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the rate of resolution of cellulitis or erysipelas among patients treated with daptomycin or vancomycin. Daptomycin 4 mg/kg once daily appeared to be effective and safe for treating cellulitis or erysipelas. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2705813/ /pubmed/19222623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01988.x Text en Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Infection Pertel, P E Eisenstein, B I Link, A S Donfrid, B Biermann, E J A Bernardo, P Martone, W J The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas |
title | The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas |
topic | Infection |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2705813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19222623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01988.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pertelpe theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT eisensteinbi theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT linkas theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT donfridb theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT biermanneja theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT bernardop theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT martonewj theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT pertelpe efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT eisensteinbi efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT linkas efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT donfridb efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT biermanneja efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT bernardop efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas AT martonewj efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas |