Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas

BACKGROUND: Results from previous trials suggest that daptomycin may result in faster clinical improvement than penicillinase-resistant penicillins or vancomycin for patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate whether daptomycin treatment of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pertel, P E, Eisenstein, B I, Link, A S, Donfrid, B, Biermann, E J A, Bernardo, P, Martone, W J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2705813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19222623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01988.x
_version_ 1782169032065024000
author Pertel, P E
Eisenstein, B I
Link, A S
Donfrid, B
Biermann, E J A
Bernardo, P
Martone, W J
author_facet Pertel, P E
Eisenstein, B I
Link, A S
Donfrid, B
Biermann, E J A
Bernardo, P
Martone, W J
author_sort Pertel, P E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Results from previous trials suggest that daptomycin may result in faster clinical improvement than penicillinase-resistant penicillins or vancomycin for patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate whether daptomycin treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas would result in faster resolution compared with vancomycin. DESIGN: The study was a prospective, evaluator-blinded, multi-centre trial. Patients were randomised to receive daptomycin 4 mg/kg once daily or vancomycin according to standard of care for 7–14 days. PATIENTS: Adults diagnosed with cellulitis or erysipelas requiring hospitalisation and intravenous antibiotic therapy were eligible for enrolment. RESULTS: The clinical success rates were 94.0% for daptomycin and 90.2% for vancomycin (95% confidence interval for the difference, −6.7%, 14.3%). There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms in the time to resolution or improvement in any of the predefined clinical end-points. Both daptomycin and vancomycin were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the rate of resolution of cellulitis or erysipelas among patients treated with daptomycin or vancomycin. Daptomycin 4 mg/kg once daily appeared to be effective and safe for treating cellulitis or erysipelas.
format Text
id pubmed-2705813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27058132009-07-14 The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas Pertel, P E Eisenstein, B I Link, A S Donfrid, B Biermann, E J A Bernardo, P Martone, W J Int J Clin Pract Infection BACKGROUND: Results from previous trials suggest that daptomycin may result in faster clinical improvement than penicillinase-resistant penicillins or vancomycin for patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate whether daptomycin treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas would result in faster resolution compared with vancomycin. DESIGN: The study was a prospective, evaluator-blinded, multi-centre trial. Patients were randomised to receive daptomycin 4 mg/kg once daily or vancomycin according to standard of care for 7–14 days. PATIENTS: Adults diagnosed with cellulitis or erysipelas requiring hospitalisation and intravenous antibiotic therapy were eligible for enrolment. RESULTS: The clinical success rates were 94.0% for daptomycin and 90.2% for vancomycin (95% confidence interval for the difference, −6.7%, 14.3%). There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms in the time to resolution or improvement in any of the predefined clinical end-points. Both daptomycin and vancomycin were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the rate of resolution of cellulitis or erysipelas among patients treated with daptomycin or vancomycin. Daptomycin 4 mg/kg once daily appeared to be effective and safe for treating cellulitis or erysipelas. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2705813/ /pubmed/19222623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01988.x Text en Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Infection
Pertel, P E
Eisenstein, B I
Link, A S
Donfrid, B
Biermann, E J A
Bernardo, P
Martone, W J
The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas
title The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas
title_full The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas
title_short The efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas
title_sort efficacy and safety of daptomycin vs. vancomycin for the treatment of cellulitis and erysipelas
topic Infection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2705813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19222623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01988.x
work_keys_str_mv AT pertelpe theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT eisensteinbi theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT linkas theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT donfridb theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT biermanneja theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT bernardop theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT martonewj theefficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT pertelpe efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT eisensteinbi efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT linkas efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT donfridb efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT biermanneja efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT bernardop efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas
AT martonewj efficacyandsafetyofdaptomycinvsvancomycinforthetreatmentofcellulitisanderysipelas