Cargando…

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?

Although many studies have shown beneficial effects of SDD on the incidence of respiratory tract infections, SDD did not become routine practice because mortality reduction was not demonstrated in individual trials, beneficial effects on duration of ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay were not de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonten, Marc JM, Joore, Hans CA, de Jongh, Bartelt M, Kluytmans, Jan, Kuijper, Ed J, van Leeuwen, Henk J, de Smet, Anne Marie GA, Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12793864
_version_ 1782121035402838016
author Bonten, Marc JM
Joore, Hans CA
de Jongh, Bartelt M
Kluytmans, Jan
Kuijper, Ed J
van Leeuwen, Henk J
de Smet, Anne Marie GA
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina
author_facet Bonten, Marc JM
Joore, Hans CA
de Jongh, Bartelt M
Kluytmans, Jan
Kuijper, Ed J
van Leeuwen, Henk J
de Smet, Anne Marie GA
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina
author_sort Bonten, Marc JM
collection PubMed
description Although many studies have shown beneficial effects of SDD on the incidence of respiratory tract infections, SDD did not become routine practice because mortality reduction was not demonstrated in individual trials, beneficial effects on duration of ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay were not demonstrated, cost-efficacy had not been demonstrated, and selection of antibiotic resistance was considered a serious side-effect. A recent study has now shown improved patient survival and lower prevalence of antibiotic resistance in patients receiving SDD. Why could this study show mortality reduction, where all others studies had failed before? And do the microbiological data unequivocally prove protective effects of SDD on emergence of antibiotic resistance? Interestingly, the reported mortality reductions exceeds even the most optimistic predictions from previous meta-analyses, but a clear explanation is not yet evident. The data on antibiotic resistance, however, are rather superficial and do not allow to interpret the underlying epidemiological dynamics. Therefore, the recent findings are provocative and shed new light on the SDD issue, warranting studies confirming its beneficial effects but also addressing several important aspects related to study design.
format Text
id pubmed-270668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-2706682003-11-21 Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? Bonten, Marc JM Joore, Hans CA de Jongh, Bartelt M Kluytmans, Jan Kuijper, Ed J van Leeuwen, Henk J de Smet, Anne Marie GA Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina Crit Care Commentary Although many studies have shown beneficial effects of SDD on the incidence of respiratory tract infections, SDD did not become routine practice because mortality reduction was not demonstrated in individual trials, beneficial effects on duration of ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay were not demonstrated, cost-efficacy had not been demonstrated, and selection of antibiotic resistance was considered a serious side-effect. A recent study has now shown improved patient survival and lower prevalence of antibiotic resistance in patients receiving SDD. Why could this study show mortality reduction, where all others studies had failed before? And do the microbiological data unequivocally prove protective effects of SDD on emergence of antibiotic resistance? Interestingly, the reported mortality reductions exceeds even the most optimistic predictions from previous meta-analyses, but a clear explanation is not yet evident. The data on antibiotic resistance, however, are rather superficial and do not allow to interpret the underlying epidemiological dynamics. Therefore, the recent findings are provocative and shed new light on the SDD issue, warranting studies confirming its beneficial effects but also addressing several important aspects related to study design. BioMed Central 2003 2003-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC270668/ /pubmed/12793864 Text en Copyright © 2003 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Bonten, Marc JM
Joore, Hans CA
de Jongh, Bartelt M
Kluytmans, Jan
Kuijper, Ed J
van Leeuwen, Henk J
de Smet, Anne Marie GA
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?
title Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?
title_full Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?
title_fullStr Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?
title_full_unstemmed Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?
title_short Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?
title_sort selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12793864
work_keys_str_mv AT bontenmarcjm selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered
AT joorehansca selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered
AT dejonghbarteltm selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered
AT kluytmansjan selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered
AT kuijperedj selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered
AT vanleeuwenhenkj selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered
AT desmetannemariega selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered
AT vandenbrouckegraulschristina selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered