Cargando…
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered?
Although many studies have shown beneficial effects of SDD on the incidence of respiratory tract infections, SDD did not become routine practice because mortality reduction was not demonstrated in individual trials, beneficial effects on duration of ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay were not de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12793864 |
_version_ | 1782121035402838016 |
---|---|
author | Bonten, Marc JM Joore, Hans CA de Jongh, Bartelt M Kluytmans, Jan Kuijper, Ed J van Leeuwen, Henk J de Smet, Anne Marie GA Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina |
author_facet | Bonten, Marc JM Joore, Hans CA de Jongh, Bartelt M Kluytmans, Jan Kuijper, Ed J van Leeuwen, Henk J de Smet, Anne Marie GA Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina |
author_sort | Bonten, Marc JM |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although many studies have shown beneficial effects of SDD on the incidence of respiratory tract infections, SDD did not become routine practice because mortality reduction was not demonstrated in individual trials, beneficial effects on duration of ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay were not demonstrated, cost-efficacy had not been demonstrated, and selection of antibiotic resistance was considered a serious side-effect. A recent study has now shown improved patient survival and lower prevalence of antibiotic resistance in patients receiving SDD. Why could this study show mortality reduction, where all others studies had failed before? And do the microbiological data unequivocally prove protective effects of SDD on emergence of antibiotic resistance? Interestingly, the reported mortality reductions exceeds even the most optimistic predictions from previous meta-analyses, but a clear explanation is not yet evident. The data on antibiotic resistance, however, are rather superficial and do not allow to interpret the underlying epidemiological dynamics. Therefore, the recent findings are provocative and shed new light on the SDD issue, warranting studies confirming its beneficial effects but also addressing several important aspects related to study design. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-270668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-2706682003-11-21 Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? Bonten, Marc JM Joore, Hans CA de Jongh, Bartelt M Kluytmans, Jan Kuijper, Ed J van Leeuwen, Henk J de Smet, Anne Marie GA Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina Crit Care Commentary Although many studies have shown beneficial effects of SDD on the incidence of respiratory tract infections, SDD did not become routine practice because mortality reduction was not demonstrated in individual trials, beneficial effects on duration of ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay were not demonstrated, cost-efficacy had not been demonstrated, and selection of antibiotic resistance was considered a serious side-effect. A recent study has now shown improved patient survival and lower prevalence of antibiotic resistance in patients receiving SDD. Why could this study show mortality reduction, where all others studies had failed before? And do the microbiological data unequivocally prove protective effects of SDD on emergence of antibiotic resistance? Interestingly, the reported mortality reductions exceeds even the most optimistic predictions from previous meta-analyses, but a clear explanation is not yet evident. The data on antibiotic resistance, however, are rather superficial and do not allow to interpret the underlying epidemiological dynamics. Therefore, the recent findings are provocative and shed new light on the SDD issue, warranting studies confirming its beneficial effects but also addressing several important aspects related to study design. BioMed Central 2003 2003-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC270668/ /pubmed/12793864 Text en Copyright © 2003 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Bonten, Marc JM Joore, Hans CA de Jongh, Bartelt M Kluytmans, Jan Kuijper, Ed J van Leeuwen, Henk J de Smet, Anne Marie GA Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? |
title | Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? |
title_full | Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? |
title_fullStr | Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? |
title_short | Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? |
title_sort | selective decontamination of the digestive tract: all questions answered? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12793864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bontenmarcjm selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered AT joorehansca selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered AT dejonghbarteltm selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered AT kluytmansjan selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered AT kuijperedj selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered AT vanleeuwenhenkj selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered AT desmetannemariega selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered AT vandenbrouckegraulschristina selectivedecontaminationofthedigestivetractallquestionsanswered |