Cargando…

The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK

BACKGROUND: Accurate spirometry is important in the management of COPD. The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme for general practitioners includes spirometry related indicators within its COPD domain. It is not known whether high achievement against QOF spirometry indicators...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strong, Mark, South, Gail, Carlisle, Robin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2706821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-108
_version_ 1782169095951613952
author Strong, Mark
South, Gail
Carlisle, Robin
author_facet Strong, Mark
South, Gail
Carlisle, Robin
author_sort Strong, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate spirometry is important in the management of COPD. The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme for general practitioners includes spirometry related indicators within its COPD domain. It is not known whether high achievement against QOF spirometry indicators is associated with spirometry to BTS standards. METHODS: Data were obtained from the records of 3,217 patients randomly sampled from 5,649 patients with COPD in 38 general practices in Rotherham, UK. Severity of airflow obstruction was categorised by FEV1 (% predicted) according to NICE guidelines. This was compared with clinician recorded COPD severity. The proportion of patients whose spirometry met BTS standards was calculated in each practice using a random sub-sample of 761 patients. The Spearman rank correlation between practice level QOF spirometry achievement and performance against BTS spirometry standards was calculated. RESULTS: Spirometry as assessed by clinical records was to BTS standards in 31% of cases (range at practice level 0% to 74%). The categorisation of airflow obstruction according to the most recent spirometry results did not agree well with the clinical categorisation of COPD recorded in the notes (Cohen's kappa = 0.34, 0.30 – 0.38). 12% of patients on COPD registers had FEV1 (% predicted) results recorded that did not support the diagnosis of COPD. There was no association between quality, as measured by adherence to BTS spirometry standards, and either QOF COPD9 achievement (Spearman's rho = -0.11), or QOF COPD10 achievement (rho = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework currently assesses the quantity, but not the quality of spirometry.
format Text
id pubmed-2706821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27068212009-07-08 The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK Strong, Mark South, Gail Carlisle, Robin BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate spirometry is important in the management of COPD. The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme for general practitioners includes spirometry related indicators within its COPD domain. It is not known whether high achievement against QOF spirometry indicators is associated with spirometry to BTS standards. METHODS: Data were obtained from the records of 3,217 patients randomly sampled from 5,649 patients with COPD in 38 general practices in Rotherham, UK. Severity of airflow obstruction was categorised by FEV1 (% predicted) according to NICE guidelines. This was compared with clinician recorded COPD severity. The proportion of patients whose spirometry met BTS standards was calculated in each practice using a random sub-sample of 761 patients. The Spearman rank correlation between practice level QOF spirometry achievement and performance against BTS spirometry standards was calculated. RESULTS: Spirometry as assessed by clinical records was to BTS standards in 31% of cases (range at practice level 0% to 74%). The categorisation of airflow obstruction according to the most recent spirometry results did not agree well with the clinical categorisation of COPD recorded in the notes (Cohen's kappa = 0.34, 0.30 – 0.38). 12% of patients on COPD registers had FEV1 (% predicted) results recorded that did not support the diagnosis of COPD. There was no association between quality, as measured by adherence to BTS spirometry standards, and either QOF COPD9 achievement (Spearman's rho = -0.11), or QOF COPD10 achievement (rho = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework currently assesses the quantity, but not the quality of spirometry. BioMed Central 2009-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2706821/ /pubmed/19558719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-108 Text en Copyright © 2009 Strong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Strong, Mark
South, Gail
Carlisle, Robin
The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK
title The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK
title_full The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK
title_fullStr The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK
title_full_unstemmed The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK
title_short The UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? A cross-sectional study in Rotherham, UK
title_sort uk quality and outcomes framework pay-for-performance scheme and spirometry: rewarding quality or just quantity? a cross-sectional study in rotherham, uk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2706821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-108
work_keys_str_mv AT strongmark theukqualityandoutcomesframeworkpayforperformanceschemeandspirometryrewardingqualityorjustquantityacrosssectionalstudyinrotherhamuk
AT southgail theukqualityandoutcomesframeworkpayforperformanceschemeandspirometryrewardingqualityorjustquantityacrosssectionalstudyinrotherhamuk
AT carlislerobin theukqualityandoutcomesframeworkpayforperformanceschemeandspirometryrewardingqualityorjustquantityacrosssectionalstudyinrotherhamuk
AT strongmark ukqualityandoutcomesframeworkpayforperformanceschemeandspirometryrewardingqualityorjustquantityacrosssectionalstudyinrotherhamuk
AT southgail ukqualityandoutcomesframeworkpayforperformanceschemeandspirometryrewardingqualityorjustquantityacrosssectionalstudyinrotherhamuk
AT carlislerobin ukqualityandoutcomesframeworkpayforperformanceschemeandspirometryrewardingqualityorjustquantityacrosssectionalstudyinrotherhamuk