Cargando…
Endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything?
Concerns about the work of breathing imposed by the endotracheal tube have led clinicians to routinely use pressure support to overcome this resistive component. More recently, ventilator manufacturers have introduced systems to automatically overcome endotracheal tube resistance, regardless of tube...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12974965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2367 |
_version_ | 1782121048954634240 |
---|---|
author | Branson, Richard D |
author_facet | Branson, Richard D |
author_sort | Branson, Richard D |
collection | PubMed |
description | Concerns about the work of breathing imposed by the endotracheal tube have led clinicians to routinely use pressure support to overcome this resistive component. More recently, ventilator manufacturers have introduced systems to automatically overcome endotracheal tube resistance, regardless of tube diameter or patient demand for flow. Despite the theoretical advantages, neither method appears to provide superior performance. Stepping back, the real question may be, is overcoming endotracheal tube resistance really important? |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-270725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-2707252003-11-21 Endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything? Branson, Richard D Crit Care Commentary Concerns about the work of breathing imposed by the endotracheal tube have led clinicians to routinely use pressure support to overcome this resistive component. More recently, ventilator manufacturers have introduced systems to automatically overcome endotracheal tube resistance, regardless of tube diameter or patient demand for flow. Despite the theoretical advantages, neither method appears to provide superior performance. Stepping back, the real question may be, is overcoming endotracheal tube resistance really important? BioMed Central 2003 2003-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC270725/ /pubmed/12974965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2367 Text en Copyright © 2003 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Branson, Richard D Endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything? |
title | Endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything? |
title_full | Endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything? |
title_fullStr | Endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything? |
title_full_unstemmed | Endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything? |
title_short | Endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything? |
title_sort | endotracheal tubes and imposed work of breathing: what should we do about it, if anything? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12974965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bransonrichardd endotrachealtubesandimposedworkofbreathingwhatshouldwedoaboutitifanything |