Cargando…

Do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored

Many patients are believed to be at risk of dysrhythmias and are felt to require cardiac monitoring. These patients may not be deemed ill enough to occupy a high dependency or critical care bed and are monitored on general wards. Monitoring policies vary widely not only between institutions, but als...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cusack, RJ, Coutts, JF
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12974966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2368
_version_ 1782121049188466688
author Cusack, RJ
Coutts, JF
author_facet Cusack, RJ
Coutts, JF
author_sort Cusack, RJ
collection PubMed
description Many patients are believed to be at risk of dysrhythmias and are felt to require cardiac monitoring. These patients may not be deemed ill enough to occupy a high dependency or critical care bed and are monitored on general wards. Monitoring policies vary widely not only between institutions, but also between individual medical staff. These variations occur due to differing availability of resources and due to the lack of consensus regarding the risk for an individual patient. There is no clear evidence that monitoring patients outside high dependency areas is of benefit; inappropriate use of monitoring may actually increase patient risk.
format Text
id pubmed-270726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-2707262003-11-21 Do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored Cusack, RJ Coutts, JF Crit Care Commentary Many patients are believed to be at risk of dysrhythmias and are felt to require cardiac monitoring. These patients may not be deemed ill enough to occupy a high dependency or critical care bed and are monitored on general wards. Monitoring policies vary widely not only between institutions, but also between individual medical staff. These variations occur due to differing availability of resources and due to the lack of consensus regarding the risk for an individual patient. There is no clear evidence that monitoring patients outside high dependency areas is of benefit; inappropriate use of monitoring may actually increase patient risk. BioMed Central 2003 2003-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC270726/ /pubmed/12974966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2368 Text en Copyright © 2003 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Cusack, RJ
Coutts, JF
Do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored
title Do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored
title_full Do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored
title_fullStr Do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored
title_full_unstemmed Do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored
title_short Do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored
title_sort do not be alarmed, the patient is monitored
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12974966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2368
work_keys_str_mv AT cusackrj donotbealarmedthepatientismonitored
AT couttsjf donotbealarmedthepatientismonitored