Cargando…
Quality improvement in depression care in the Netherlands: the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative. A quality improvement report
BACKGROUND: Improving the healthcare for patients with depression is a priority health policy across the world. Roughly, two major problems can be identified in daily practice: (1) the content of care is often not completely consistent with recommendations in guidelines and (2) the organization of c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2707591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19590610 |
_version_ | 1782169174134489088 |
---|---|
author | Franx, Gerdien Meeuwissen, Jolanda A.C Sinnema, Henny Spijker, Jan Huyser, Jochanan Wensing, Michel de Lange, Jacomine |
author_facet | Franx, Gerdien Meeuwissen, Jolanda A.C Sinnema, Henny Spijker, Jan Huyser, Jochanan Wensing, Michel de Lange, Jacomine |
author_sort | Franx, Gerdien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving the healthcare for patients with depression is a priority health policy across the world. Roughly, two major problems can be identified in daily practice: (1) the content of care is often not completely consistent with recommendations in guidelines and (2) the organization of care is not always integrated and delivered by multidisciplinary teams. AIM: To describe the content and preliminary results of a quality improvement project in primary care, aiming at improving the uptake of clinical depression guidelines in daily practice as well as the collaboration between different mental health professionals. METHOD: A Depression Breakthrough Collaborative was initiated from December 2006 until March 2008. The activities included the development and implementation of a stepped care depression model, a care pathway with two levels of treatment intensity: a first step treatment level for patients with non-severe depression (brief or mild depressive symptoms) and a second step level for patients with severe depression. Twelve months data were measured by the teams in terms of one outcome and several process indicators. Qualitative data were gathered by the national project team with a semi-structured questionnaire amongst the local team coordinators. RESULTS: Thirteen multidisciplinary teams participated in the project. In total 101 health professionals were involved, and 536 patients were diagnosed. Overall 356 patients (66%) were considered non-severely depressed and 180 (34%) patients showed severe symptoms. The mean percentage of non-severe patients treated according to the stepped care model was 78%, and 57% for the severely depressed patient group. The proportion of non-severely depressed patients receiving a first step treatment according to the stepped care model, improved during the project, this was not the case for the severely depressed patients. The teams were able to monitor depression symptoms to a reasonable extent during a period of 6 months. Within 3 months, 28% of monitored patients had recovered, meaning a Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score of 10 and lower, and another 27% recovered between 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: A stepped care approach seems acceptable and feasible in primary care, introducing different levels of care for different patient groups. Future implementation projects should pay special attention to the quality of care for severely depressed patients. Although the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative introduced new treatment concepts in primary and specialty care, the change capacity of the method remains unclear. Thorough data gathering is needed to judge the real value of these intensive improvement projects. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2707591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27075912009-07-09 Quality improvement in depression care in the Netherlands: the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative. A quality improvement report Franx, Gerdien Meeuwissen, Jolanda A.C Sinnema, Henny Spijker, Jan Huyser, Jochanan Wensing, Michel de Lange, Jacomine Int J Integr Care Projects and Developments BACKGROUND: Improving the healthcare for patients with depression is a priority health policy across the world. Roughly, two major problems can be identified in daily practice: (1) the content of care is often not completely consistent with recommendations in guidelines and (2) the organization of care is not always integrated and delivered by multidisciplinary teams. AIM: To describe the content and preliminary results of a quality improvement project in primary care, aiming at improving the uptake of clinical depression guidelines in daily practice as well as the collaboration between different mental health professionals. METHOD: A Depression Breakthrough Collaborative was initiated from December 2006 until March 2008. The activities included the development and implementation of a stepped care depression model, a care pathway with two levels of treatment intensity: a first step treatment level for patients with non-severe depression (brief or mild depressive symptoms) and a second step level for patients with severe depression. Twelve months data were measured by the teams in terms of one outcome and several process indicators. Qualitative data were gathered by the national project team with a semi-structured questionnaire amongst the local team coordinators. RESULTS: Thirteen multidisciplinary teams participated in the project. In total 101 health professionals were involved, and 536 patients were diagnosed. Overall 356 patients (66%) were considered non-severely depressed and 180 (34%) patients showed severe symptoms. The mean percentage of non-severe patients treated according to the stepped care model was 78%, and 57% for the severely depressed patient group. The proportion of non-severely depressed patients receiving a first step treatment according to the stepped care model, improved during the project, this was not the case for the severely depressed patients. The teams were able to monitor depression symptoms to a reasonable extent during a period of 6 months. Within 3 months, 28% of monitored patients had recovered, meaning a Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score of 10 and lower, and another 27% recovered between 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: A stepped care approach seems acceptable and feasible in primary care, introducing different levels of care for different patient groups. Future implementation projects should pay special attention to the quality of care for severely depressed patients. Although the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative introduced new treatment concepts in primary and specialty care, the change capacity of the method remains unclear. Thorough data gathering is needed to judge the real value of these intensive improvement projects. Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving 2009-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2707591/ /pubmed/19590610 Text en Copyright 2009, International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) |
spellingShingle | Projects and Developments Franx, Gerdien Meeuwissen, Jolanda A.C Sinnema, Henny Spijker, Jan Huyser, Jochanan Wensing, Michel de Lange, Jacomine Quality improvement in depression care in the Netherlands: the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative. A quality improvement report |
title | Quality improvement in depression care in the Netherlands: the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative. A quality improvement report |
title_full | Quality improvement in depression care in the Netherlands: the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative. A quality improvement report |
title_fullStr | Quality improvement in depression care in the Netherlands: the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative. A quality improvement report |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality improvement in depression care in the Netherlands: the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative. A quality improvement report |
title_short | Quality improvement in depression care in the Netherlands: the Depression Breakthrough Collaborative. A quality improvement report |
title_sort | quality improvement in depression care in the netherlands: the depression breakthrough collaborative. a quality improvement report |
topic | Projects and Developments |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2707591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19590610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franxgerdien qualityimprovementindepressioncareinthenetherlandsthedepressionbreakthroughcollaborativeaqualityimprovementreport AT meeuwissenjolandaac qualityimprovementindepressioncareinthenetherlandsthedepressionbreakthroughcollaborativeaqualityimprovementreport AT sinnemahenny qualityimprovementindepressioncareinthenetherlandsthedepressionbreakthroughcollaborativeaqualityimprovementreport AT spijkerjan qualityimprovementindepressioncareinthenetherlandsthedepressionbreakthroughcollaborativeaqualityimprovementreport AT huyserjochanan qualityimprovementindepressioncareinthenetherlandsthedepressionbreakthroughcollaborativeaqualityimprovementreport AT wensingmichel qualityimprovementindepressioncareinthenetherlandsthedepressionbreakthroughcollaborativeaqualityimprovementreport AT delangejacomine qualityimprovementindepressioncareinthenetherlandsthedepressionbreakthroughcollaborativeaqualityimprovementreport |