Cargando…

Comparing techniques for pterygium surgery

PURPOSE: To compare various techniques of pterygium surgery including bare sclera, intraoperative mitomycin C application, conjunctival flap reconstruction, and conjunctival autografting technique. METHODS: This study is designed to compare 4 currently used techniques in order to determine the compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alpay, Atilla, Uğurbaş, Suat Hayri, Erdoğan, Berktuğ
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668546
_version_ 1782169259620696064
author Alpay, Atilla
Uğurbaş, Suat Hayri
Erdoğan, Berktuğ
author_facet Alpay, Atilla
Uğurbaş, Suat Hayri
Erdoğan, Berktuğ
author_sort Alpay, Atilla
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare various techniques of pterygium surgery including bare sclera, intraoperative mitomycin C application, conjunctival flap reconstruction, and conjunctival autografting technique. METHODS: This study is designed to compare 4 currently used techniques in order to determine the complication and recurrence rates after pterygium exision. Included in the study were 77 eyes from 60 patients. Bare sclera technique was used to treat 21 primary pterygia;mitomycin C was used to treat 20 (16 primary, 4 recurrent) pterygia;18 (17 primary, 1 recurrent) pterygia were treated by conjuntival flap reconstruction;and 18 (9 primary, 9 recurrent) pterygia were treated by conjunctival autografting technique. All patients who underwent surgery were followed up for between 6 months and 2 years. RESULTS: Eight recurrences (38.09%) were observed in the bare sclera group whereas there were 5 (25%) recurrences in the mitomycin C group. In the conjunctival flap reconstruction group, 6 (33.33%) recurrences were detected. In the conjunctival autografting group, 3 recurrences were observed. There were no major complications threatening visual ability in the surgical patients. CONCLUSION: A comparison of the groups demonstrated that the recurrence rate was highest in the bare sclera group, and lowest in conjunctival autografting and mitomycin C treatment groups respectively. Although the conjunctival autografting technique is a more difficult and time consuming technique than the others, cosmetic and surgical results were found to be superior. We advise conjunctival autografting for the treatment of pterygium in view of the high recurrence rates of other techniques, and the possible complications of mitomycin C treatment for benign disease.
format Text
id pubmed-2709008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27090082009-08-10 Comparing techniques for pterygium surgery Alpay, Atilla Uğurbaş, Suat Hayri Erdoğan, Berktuğ Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare various techniques of pterygium surgery including bare sclera, intraoperative mitomycin C application, conjunctival flap reconstruction, and conjunctival autografting technique. METHODS: This study is designed to compare 4 currently used techniques in order to determine the complication and recurrence rates after pterygium exision. Included in the study were 77 eyes from 60 patients. Bare sclera technique was used to treat 21 primary pterygia;mitomycin C was used to treat 20 (16 primary, 4 recurrent) pterygia;18 (17 primary, 1 recurrent) pterygia were treated by conjuntival flap reconstruction;and 18 (9 primary, 9 recurrent) pterygia were treated by conjunctival autografting technique. All patients who underwent surgery were followed up for between 6 months and 2 years. RESULTS: Eight recurrences (38.09%) were observed in the bare sclera group whereas there were 5 (25%) recurrences in the mitomycin C group. In the conjunctival flap reconstruction group, 6 (33.33%) recurrences were detected. In the conjunctival autografting group, 3 recurrences were observed. There were no major complications threatening visual ability in the surgical patients. CONCLUSION: A comparison of the groups demonstrated that the recurrence rate was highest in the bare sclera group, and lowest in conjunctival autografting and mitomycin C treatment groups respectively. Although the conjunctival autografting technique is a more difficult and time consuming technique than the others, cosmetic and surgical results were found to be superior. We advise conjunctival autografting for the treatment of pterygium in view of the high recurrence rates of other techniques, and the possible complications of mitomycin C treatment for benign disease. Dove Medical Press 2009 2009-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2709008/ /pubmed/19668546 Text en © 2009 Alpay et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Alpay, Atilla
Uğurbaş, Suat Hayri
Erdoğan, Berktuğ
Comparing techniques for pterygium surgery
title Comparing techniques for pterygium surgery
title_full Comparing techniques for pterygium surgery
title_fullStr Comparing techniques for pterygium surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparing techniques for pterygium surgery
title_short Comparing techniques for pterygium surgery
title_sort comparing techniques for pterygium surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668546
work_keys_str_mv AT alpayatilla comparingtechniquesforpterygiumsurgery
AT ugurbassuathayri comparingtechniquesforpterygiumsurgery
AT erdoganberktug comparingtechniquesforpterygiumsurgery