Cargando…

A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

PURPOSE: To determine the short-term comfort after a single dose of travoprost BAK-free compared to latanoprost in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients. DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked, randomized comparison of two separate active agents dosed once in opposite eyes. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godfrey, David A, Peplinski, Lee S, Stewart, Jeanette A, Stewart, William C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668564
_version_ 1782169263410249728
author Godfrey, David A
Peplinski, Lee S
Stewart, Jeanette A
Stewart, William C
author_facet Godfrey, David A
Peplinski, Lee S
Stewart, Jeanette A
Stewart, William C
author_sort Godfrey, David A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the short-term comfort after a single dose of travoprost BAK-free compared to latanoprost in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients. DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked, randomized comparison of two separate active agents dosed once in opposite eyes. METHODS: At Visit 1, qualified patients began a glaucoma medicine-free period for three days. At Visit 2, patients were randomly assigned to travoprost BAK-free or latanoprost in opposite eyes. Following dosing in each eye, patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS score, 0–100 mm) at specified time intervals and a comfort survey. RESULTS: In 54 completed subjects, no difference existed five seconds after dosing, in comfort on the VAS between latanoprost (7.1 ± 16.2 mm) and travoprost BAK-free (7.8 ± 16.1 mm, P = 0.53). Also no differences existed between treatments following dosing for discomfort at individual timepoints past five seconds, peak discomfort or the time required to return to baseline comfort (P > 0.05). In addition, the comfort survey demonstrated no difference between products for burning, stinging, foreign body sensation, overall comfort and general acceptance between the products, both for absolute levels and changes from baseline (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Following a single instillation, both latanoprost and travoprost BAK-free exhibit similar comfort scores.
format Text
id pubmed-2709024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27090242009-08-10 A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension Godfrey, David A Peplinski, Lee S Stewart, Jeanette A Stewart, William C Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To determine the short-term comfort after a single dose of travoprost BAK-free compared to latanoprost in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients. DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked, randomized comparison of two separate active agents dosed once in opposite eyes. METHODS: At Visit 1, qualified patients began a glaucoma medicine-free period for three days. At Visit 2, patients were randomly assigned to travoprost BAK-free or latanoprost in opposite eyes. Following dosing in each eye, patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS score, 0–100 mm) at specified time intervals and a comfort survey. RESULTS: In 54 completed subjects, no difference existed five seconds after dosing, in comfort on the VAS between latanoprost (7.1 ± 16.2 mm) and travoprost BAK-free (7.8 ± 16.1 mm, P = 0.53). Also no differences existed between treatments following dosing for discomfort at individual timepoints past five seconds, peak discomfort or the time required to return to baseline comfort (P > 0.05). In addition, the comfort survey demonstrated no difference between products for burning, stinging, foreign body sensation, overall comfort and general acceptance between the products, both for absolute levels and changes from baseline (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Following a single instillation, both latanoprost and travoprost BAK-free exhibit similar comfort scores. Dove Medical Press 2009 2009-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2709024/ /pubmed/19668564 Text en © 2009 Godfrey et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Godfrey, David A
Peplinski, Lee S
Stewart, Jeanette A
Stewart, William C
A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_full A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_fullStr A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_full_unstemmed A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_short A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_sort comfort comparison of travoprost bak-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668564
work_keys_str_mv AT godfreydavida acomfortcomparisonoftravoprostbakfree0004versuslatanoprost0005inpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT peplinskilees acomfortcomparisonoftravoprostbakfree0004versuslatanoprost0005inpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT stewartjeanettea acomfortcomparisonoftravoprostbakfree0004versuslatanoprost0005inpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT stewartwilliamc acomfortcomparisonoftravoprostbakfree0004versuslatanoprost0005inpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT godfreydavida comfortcomparisonoftravoprostbakfree0004versuslatanoprost0005inpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT peplinskilees comfortcomparisonoftravoprostbakfree0004versuslatanoprost0005inpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT stewartjeanettea comfortcomparisonoftravoprostbakfree0004versuslatanoprost0005inpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT stewartwilliamc comfortcomparisonoftravoprostbakfree0004versuslatanoprost0005inpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension