Cargando…
Maximum recovery after knee replacement – the MARKER study rationale and protocol
BACKGROUND: There is little scientific evidence to support the usual practice of providing outpatient rehabilitation to patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery (TKR) immediately after discharge from the orthopaedic ward. It is hypothesised that the lack of clinical benefit is due to the l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19534770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-69 |
_version_ | 1782169320529330176 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Chung-Wei Christine March, Lyn Crosbie, Jack Crawford, Ross Graves, Stephen Naylor, Justine Harmer, Alison Jan, Stephen Bennell, Kim Harris, Ian Parker, David Moffet, Helene Fransen, Marlene |
author_facet | Lin, Chung-Wei Christine March, Lyn Crosbie, Jack Crawford, Ross Graves, Stephen Naylor, Justine Harmer, Alison Jan, Stephen Bennell, Kim Harris, Ian Parker, David Moffet, Helene Fransen, Marlene |
author_sort | Lin, Chung-Wei Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is little scientific evidence to support the usual practice of providing outpatient rehabilitation to patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery (TKR) immediately after discharge from the orthopaedic ward. It is hypothesised that the lack of clinical benefit is due to the low exercise intensity tolerated at this time, with patients still recovering from the effects of major orthopaedic surgery. The aim of the proposed clinical trial is to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of a novel rehabilitation strategy, consisting of an initial home exercise programme followed, approximately six weeks later, by higher intensity outpatient exercise classes. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 600 patients undergoing primary TKR will be recruited at the orthopaedic pre-admission clinic of 10 large public and private hospitals in Australia. There will be no change to the medical or rehabilitative care usually provided while the participant is admitted to the orthopaedic ward. After TKR, but prior to discharge from the orthopaedic ward, participants will be randomised to either the novel rehabilitation strategy or usual rehabilitative care as provided by the hospital or recommended by the orthopaedic surgeon. Outcomes assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-admission clinic) and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months following randomisation. The primary outcomes will be self-reported knee pain and physical function. Secondary outcomes include quality of life and objective measures of physical performance. Health economic data (health sector and community service utilisation, loss of productivity) will be recorded prospectively by participants in a patient diary. This patient cohort will also be followed-up annually for five years for knee pain, physical function and the need or actual incidence of further joint replacement surgery. DISCUSSION: The results of this pragmatic clinical trial can be directly implemented into clinical practice. If beneficial, the novel rehabilitation strategy of utilising outpatient exercise classes during a later rehabilitation phase would provide a feasible and potentially cost-effective intervention to optimise the physical well-being of the large number of people undergoing TKR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12609000054213 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2709653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27096532009-07-14 Maximum recovery after knee replacement – the MARKER study rationale and protocol Lin, Chung-Wei Christine March, Lyn Crosbie, Jack Crawford, Ross Graves, Stephen Naylor, Justine Harmer, Alison Jan, Stephen Bennell, Kim Harris, Ian Parker, David Moffet, Helene Fransen, Marlene BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is little scientific evidence to support the usual practice of providing outpatient rehabilitation to patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery (TKR) immediately after discharge from the orthopaedic ward. It is hypothesised that the lack of clinical benefit is due to the low exercise intensity tolerated at this time, with patients still recovering from the effects of major orthopaedic surgery. The aim of the proposed clinical trial is to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of a novel rehabilitation strategy, consisting of an initial home exercise programme followed, approximately six weeks later, by higher intensity outpatient exercise classes. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 600 patients undergoing primary TKR will be recruited at the orthopaedic pre-admission clinic of 10 large public and private hospitals in Australia. There will be no change to the medical or rehabilitative care usually provided while the participant is admitted to the orthopaedic ward. After TKR, but prior to discharge from the orthopaedic ward, participants will be randomised to either the novel rehabilitation strategy or usual rehabilitative care as provided by the hospital or recommended by the orthopaedic surgeon. Outcomes assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-admission clinic) and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months following randomisation. The primary outcomes will be self-reported knee pain and physical function. Secondary outcomes include quality of life and objective measures of physical performance. Health economic data (health sector and community service utilisation, loss of productivity) will be recorded prospectively by participants in a patient diary. This patient cohort will also be followed-up annually for five years for knee pain, physical function and the need or actual incidence of further joint replacement surgery. DISCUSSION: The results of this pragmatic clinical trial can be directly implemented into clinical practice. If beneficial, the novel rehabilitation strategy of utilising outpatient exercise classes during a later rehabilitation phase would provide a feasible and potentially cost-effective intervention to optimise the physical well-being of the large number of people undergoing TKR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12609000054213 BioMed Central 2009-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2709653/ /pubmed/19534770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-69 Text en Copyright © 2009 Lin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lin, Chung-Wei Christine March, Lyn Crosbie, Jack Crawford, Ross Graves, Stephen Naylor, Justine Harmer, Alison Jan, Stephen Bennell, Kim Harris, Ian Parker, David Moffet, Helene Fransen, Marlene Maximum recovery after knee replacement – the MARKER study rationale and protocol |
title | Maximum recovery after knee replacement – the MARKER study rationale and protocol |
title_full | Maximum recovery after knee replacement – the MARKER study rationale and protocol |
title_fullStr | Maximum recovery after knee replacement – the MARKER study rationale and protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Maximum recovery after knee replacement – the MARKER study rationale and protocol |
title_short | Maximum recovery after knee replacement – the MARKER study rationale and protocol |
title_sort | maximum recovery after knee replacement – the marker study rationale and protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19534770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-69 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linchungweichristine maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT marchlyn maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT crosbiejack maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT crawfordross maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT gravesstephen maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT naylorjustine maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT harmeralison maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT janstephen maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT bennellkim maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT harrisian maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT parkerdavid maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT moffethelene maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol AT fransenmarlene maximumrecoveryafterkneereplacementthemarkerstudyrationaleandprotocol |