Cargando…

New Suggestions for the Mechanical Control of Bone Remodeling

Bone is constantly renewed over our lifetime through the process of bone (re)modeling. This process is important for bone to allow it to adapt to its mechanical environment and to repair damage from everyday life. Adaptation is thought to occur through the mechanosensitive response controlling the b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunlop, J. W. C., Hartmann, M. A., Bréchet, Y. J., Fratzl, P., Weinkamer, R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19373504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-009-9242-x
_version_ 1782169329718001664
author Dunlop, J. W. C.
Hartmann, M. A.
Bréchet, Y. J.
Fratzl, P.
Weinkamer, R.
author_facet Dunlop, J. W. C.
Hartmann, M. A.
Bréchet, Y. J.
Fratzl, P.
Weinkamer, R.
author_sort Dunlop, J. W. C.
collection PubMed
description Bone is constantly renewed over our lifetime through the process of bone (re)modeling. This process is important for bone to allow it to adapt to its mechanical environment and to repair damage from everyday life. Adaptation is thought to occur through the mechanosensitive response controlling the bone-forming and -resorbing cells. This report shows a way to extract quantitative information about the way remodeling is controlled using computer simulations. Bone resorption and deposition are described as two separate stochastic processes, during which a discrete bone packet is removed or deposited from the bone surface. The responses of the bone-forming and -resorbing cells to local mechanical stimuli are described by phenomenological remodeling rules. Our strategy was to test different remodeling rules and to evaluate the time evolution of the trabecular architecture in comparison to what is known from μ-CT measurements of real bone. In particular, we tested the reaction of virtual bone to standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention of bone deterioration, i.e., physical activity and medications to reduce bone resorption. Insensitivity of the bone volume fraction to reductions in bone resorption was observed in the simulations only for a remodeling rule including an activation barrier for the mechanical stimulus above which bone deposition is switched on. This is in disagreement with the commonly used rules having a so-called lazy zone.
format Text
id pubmed-2709883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27098832009-07-15 New Suggestions for the Mechanical Control of Bone Remodeling Dunlop, J. W. C. Hartmann, M. A. Bréchet, Y. J. Fratzl, P. Weinkamer, R. Calcif Tissue Int Article Bone is constantly renewed over our lifetime through the process of bone (re)modeling. This process is important for bone to allow it to adapt to its mechanical environment and to repair damage from everyday life. Adaptation is thought to occur through the mechanosensitive response controlling the bone-forming and -resorbing cells. This report shows a way to extract quantitative information about the way remodeling is controlled using computer simulations. Bone resorption and deposition are described as two separate stochastic processes, during which a discrete bone packet is removed or deposited from the bone surface. The responses of the bone-forming and -resorbing cells to local mechanical stimuli are described by phenomenological remodeling rules. Our strategy was to test different remodeling rules and to evaluate the time evolution of the trabecular architecture in comparison to what is known from μ-CT measurements of real bone. In particular, we tested the reaction of virtual bone to standard therapeutic strategies for the prevention of bone deterioration, i.e., physical activity and medications to reduce bone resorption. Insensitivity of the bone volume fraction to reductions in bone resorption was observed in the simulations only for a remodeling rule including an activation barrier for the mechanical stimulus above which bone deposition is switched on. This is in disagreement with the commonly used rules having a so-called lazy zone. Springer-Verlag 2009-04-17 2009-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2709883/ /pubmed/19373504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-009-9242-x Text en © The Author(s) 2009
spellingShingle Article
Dunlop, J. W. C.
Hartmann, M. A.
Bréchet, Y. J.
Fratzl, P.
Weinkamer, R.
New Suggestions for the Mechanical Control of Bone Remodeling
title New Suggestions for the Mechanical Control of Bone Remodeling
title_full New Suggestions for the Mechanical Control of Bone Remodeling
title_fullStr New Suggestions for the Mechanical Control of Bone Remodeling
title_full_unstemmed New Suggestions for the Mechanical Control of Bone Remodeling
title_short New Suggestions for the Mechanical Control of Bone Remodeling
title_sort new suggestions for the mechanical control of bone remodeling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19373504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-009-9242-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dunlopjwc newsuggestionsforthemechanicalcontrolofboneremodeling
AT hartmannma newsuggestionsforthemechanicalcontrolofboneremodeling
AT brechetyj newsuggestionsforthemechanicalcontrolofboneremodeling
AT fratzlp newsuggestionsforthemechanicalcontrolofboneremodeling
AT weinkamerr newsuggestionsforthemechanicalcontrolofboneremodeling