Cargando…
Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes
BACKGROUND: Rat models are frequently used to find genomic regions that contribute to complex diseases, so called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In general, the genomic regions found to be associated with a quantitative trait are rather large, covering hundreds of genes. To help selecting appropria...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19575795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-12 |
_version_ | 1782169331862339584 |
---|---|
author | Andersson, Lars Petersen, Greta Ståhl, Fredrik |
author_facet | Andersson, Lars Petersen, Greta Ståhl, Fredrik |
author_sort | Andersson, Lars |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rat models are frequently used to find genomic regions that contribute to complex diseases, so called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In general, the genomic regions found to be associated with a quantitative trait are rather large, covering hundreds of genes. To help selecting appropriate candidate genes from QTLs associated with type 2 diabetes models in rat, we have developed a web tool called Candidate Gene Capture (CGC), specifically adopted for this disorder. METHODS: CGC combines diabetes-related genomic regions in rat with rat/human homology data, textual descriptions of gene effects and an array of 789 keywords. Each keyword is assigned values that reflect its co-occurrence with 24 different reference terms describing sub-phenotypes of type 2 diabetes (for example "insulin resistance"). The genes are then ranked based on the occurrences of keywords in the describing texts. RESULTS: CGC includes QTLs from type 2 diabetes models in rat. When comparing gene rankings from CGC based on one sub-phenotype, with manual gene ratings for four QTLs, very similar results were obtained. In total, 24 different sub-phenotypes are available as reference terms in the application and based on differences in gene ranking, they fall into separate clusters. CONCLUSION: The very good agreement between the CGC gene ranking and the manual rating confirms that CGC is as a reliable tool for interpreting textual information. This, together with the possibility to select many different sub-phenotypes, makes CGC a versatile tool for finding candidate genes. CGC is publicly available at . |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2709893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27098932009-07-14 Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes Andersson, Lars Petersen, Greta Ståhl, Fredrik Theor Biol Med Model Research BACKGROUND: Rat models are frequently used to find genomic regions that contribute to complex diseases, so called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In general, the genomic regions found to be associated with a quantitative trait are rather large, covering hundreds of genes. To help selecting appropriate candidate genes from QTLs associated with type 2 diabetes models in rat, we have developed a web tool called Candidate Gene Capture (CGC), specifically adopted for this disorder. METHODS: CGC combines diabetes-related genomic regions in rat with rat/human homology data, textual descriptions of gene effects and an array of 789 keywords. Each keyword is assigned values that reflect its co-occurrence with 24 different reference terms describing sub-phenotypes of type 2 diabetes (for example "insulin resistance"). The genes are then ranked based on the occurrences of keywords in the describing texts. RESULTS: CGC includes QTLs from type 2 diabetes models in rat. When comparing gene rankings from CGC based on one sub-phenotype, with manual gene ratings for four QTLs, very similar results were obtained. In total, 24 different sub-phenotypes are available as reference terms in the application and based on differences in gene ranking, they fall into separate clusters. CONCLUSION: The very good agreement between the CGC gene ranking and the manual rating confirms that CGC is as a reliable tool for interpreting textual information. This, together with the possibility to select many different sub-phenotypes, makes CGC a versatile tool for finding candidate genes. CGC is publicly available at . BioMed Central 2009-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2709893/ /pubmed/19575795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-12 Text en Copyright © 2009 Andersson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Andersson, Lars Petersen, Greta Ståhl, Fredrik Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes |
title | Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes |
title_full | Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes |
title_fullStr | Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes |
title_short | Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes |
title_sort | ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19575795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anderssonlars rankingcandidategenesinratmodelsoftype2diabetes AT petersengreta rankingcandidategenesinratmodelsoftype2diabetes AT stahlfredrik rankingcandidategenesinratmodelsoftype2diabetes |