Cargando…

Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Rat models are frequently used to find genomic regions that contribute to complex diseases, so called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In general, the genomic regions found to be associated with a quantitative trait are rather large, covering hundreds of genes. To help selecting appropria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersson, Lars, Petersen, Greta, Ståhl, Fredrik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19575795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-12
_version_ 1782169331862339584
author Andersson, Lars
Petersen, Greta
Ståhl, Fredrik
author_facet Andersson, Lars
Petersen, Greta
Ståhl, Fredrik
author_sort Andersson, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rat models are frequently used to find genomic regions that contribute to complex diseases, so called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In general, the genomic regions found to be associated with a quantitative trait are rather large, covering hundreds of genes. To help selecting appropriate candidate genes from QTLs associated with type 2 diabetes models in rat, we have developed a web tool called Candidate Gene Capture (CGC), specifically adopted for this disorder. METHODS: CGC combines diabetes-related genomic regions in rat with rat/human homology data, textual descriptions of gene effects and an array of 789 keywords. Each keyword is assigned values that reflect its co-occurrence with 24 different reference terms describing sub-phenotypes of type 2 diabetes (for example "insulin resistance"). The genes are then ranked based on the occurrences of keywords in the describing texts. RESULTS: CGC includes QTLs from type 2 diabetes models in rat. When comparing gene rankings from CGC based on one sub-phenotype, with manual gene ratings for four QTLs, very similar results were obtained. In total, 24 different sub-phenotypes are available as reference terms in the application and based on differences in gene ranking, they fall into separate clusters. CONCLUSION: The very good agreement between the CGC gene ranking and the manual rating confirms that CGC is as a reliable tool for interpreting textual information. This, together with the possibility to select many different sub-phenotypes, makes CGC a versatile tool for finding candidate genes. CGC is publicly available at .
format Text
id pubmed-2709893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27098932009-07-14 Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes Andersson, Lars Petersen, Greta Ståhl, Fredrik Theor Biol Med Model Research BACKGROUND: Rat models are frequently used to find genomic regions that contribute to complex diseases, so called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In general, the genomic regions found to be associated with a quantitative trait are rather large, covering hundreds of genes. To help selecting appropriate candidate genes from QTLs associated with type 2 diabetes models in rat, we have developed a web tool called Candidate Gene Capture (CGC), specifically adopted for this disorder. METHODS: CGC combines diabetes-related genomic regions in rat with rat/human homology data, textual descriptions of gene effects and an array of 789 keywords. Each keyword is assigned values that reflect its co-occurrence with 24 different reference terms describing sub-phenotypes of type 2 diabetes (for example "insulin resistance"). The genes are then ranked based on the occurrences of keywords in the describing texts. RESULTS: CGC includes QTLs from type 2 diabetes models in rat. When comparing gene rankings from CGC based on one sub-phenotype, with manual gene ratings for four QTLs, very similar results were obtained. In total, 24 different sub-phenotypes are available as reference terms in the application and based on differences in gene ranking, they fall into separate clusters. CONCLUSION: The very good agreement between the CGC gene ranking and the manual rating confirms that CGC is as a reliable tool for interpreting textual information. This, together with the possibility to select many different sub-phenotypes, makes CGC a versatile tool for finding candidate genes. CGC is publicly available at . BioMed Central 2009-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2709893/ /pubmed/19575795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-12 Text en Copyright © 2009 Andersson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Andersson, Lars
Petersen, Greta
Ståhl, Fredrik
Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes
title Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes
title_full Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes
title_short Ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes
title_sort ranking candidate genes in rat models of type 2 diabetes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19575795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-6-12
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonlars rankingcandidategenesinratmodelsoftype2diabetes
AT petersengreta rankingcandidategenesinratmodelsoftype2diabetes
AT stahlfredrik rankingcandidategenesinratmodelsoftype2diabetes