Cargando…

Viscum album L. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research

BACKGROUND: Viscum album L. extracts (VAE, European mistletoe) are a widely used medicinal plant extract in gynaecological and breast-cancer treatment. METHODS: Systematic review to evaluate clinical studies and preclinical research on the therapeutic effectiveness and biological effects of VAE on g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kienle, Gunver S, Glockmann, Anja, Schink, Michael, Kiene, Helmut
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2711058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-28-79
_version_ 1782169402354958336
author Kienle, Gunver S
Glockmann, Anja
Schink, Michael
Kiene, Helmut
author_facet Kienle, Gunver S
Glockmann, Anja
Schink, Michael
Kiene, Helmut
author_sort Kienle, Gunver S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Viscum album L. extracts (VAE, European mistletoe) are a widely used medicinal plant extract in gynaecological and breast-cancer treatment. METHODS: Systematic review to evaluate clinical studies and preclinical research on the therapeutic effectiveness and biological effects of VAE on gynaecological and breast cancer. Search of databases, reference lists and expert consultations. Criteria-based assessment of methodological study quality. RESULTS: 19 randomized (RCT), 16 non-randomized (non-RCT) controlled studies, and 11 single-arm cohort studies were identified that investigated VAE treatment of breast or gynaecological cancer. They included 2420, 6399 and 1130 patients respectively. 8 RCTs and 8 non-RCTs were embedded in the same large epidemiological cohort study. 9 RCTs and 13 non-RCTs assessed survival; 12 reported a statistically significant benefit, the others either a trend or no difference. 3 RCTs and 6 non-RCTs assessed tumour behaviour (remission or time to relapse); 3 reported statistically significant benefit, the others either a trend, no difference or mixed results. Quality of life (QoL) and tolerability of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery was assessed in 15 RCTs and 9 non-RCTs. 21 reported a statistically significant positive result, the others either a trend, no difference, or mixed results. Methodological quality of the studies differed substantially; some had major limitations, especially RCTs on survival and tumour behaviour had very small sample sizes. Some recent studies, however, especially on QoL were reasonably well conducted. Single-arm cohort studies investigated tumour behaviour, QoL, pharmacokinetics and safety of VAE. Tumour remission was observed after high dosage and local application. VAE application was well tolerated. 34 animal experiments investigated VAE and isolated or recombinant compounds in various breast and gynaecological cancer models in mice and rats. VAE showed increase of survival and tumour remission especially in mice, while application in rats as well as application of VAE compounds had mixed results. In vitro VAE and its compounds have strong cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. CONCLUSION: VAE shows some positive effects in breast and gynaecological cancer. More research into clinical efficacy is warranted.
format Text
id pubmed-2711058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27110582009-07-16 Viscum album L. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research Kienle, Gunver S Glockmann, Anja Schink, Michael Kiene, Helmut J Exp Clin Cancer Res Review BACKGROUND: Viscum album L. extracts (VAE, European mistletoe) are a widely used medicinal plant extract in gynaecological and breast-cancer treatment. METHODS: Systematic review to evaluate clinical studies and preclinical research on the therapeutic effectiveness and biological effects of VAE on gynaecological and breast cancer. Search of databases, reference lists and expert consultations. Criteria-based assessment of methodological study quality. RESULTS: 19 randomized (RCT), 16 non-randomized (non-RCT) controlled studies, and 11 single-arm cohort studies were identified that investigated VAE treatment of breast or gynaecological cancer. They included 2420, 6399 and 1130 patients respectively. 8 RCTs and 8 non-RCTs were embedded in the same large epidemiological cohort study. 9 RCTs and 13 non-RCTs assessed survival; 12 reported a statistically significant benefit, the others either a trend or no difference. 3 RCTs and 6 non-RCTs assessed tumour behaviour (remission or time to relapse); 3 reported statistically significant benefit, the others either a trend, no difference or mixed results. Quality of life (QoL) and tolerability of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery was assessed in 15 RCTs and 9 non-RCTs. 21 reported a statistically significant positive result, the others either a trend, no difference, or mixed results. Methodological quality of the studies differed substantially; some had major limitations, especially RCTs on survival and tumour behaviour had very small sample sizes. Some recent studies, however, especially on QoL were reasonably well conducted. Single-arm cohort studies investigated tumour behaviour, QoL, pharmacokinetics and safety of VAE. Tumour remission was observed after high dosage and local application. VAE application was well tolerated. 34 animal experiments investigated VAE and isolated or recombinant compounds in various breast and gynaecological cancer models in mice and rats. VAE showed increase of survival and tumour remission especially in mice, while application in rats as well as application of VAE compounds had mixed results. In vitro VAE and its compounds have strong cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. CONCLUSION: VAE shows some positive effects in breast and gynaecological cancer. More research into clinical efficacy is warranted. BioMed Central 2009-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2711058/ /pubmed/19519890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-28-79 Text en Copyright © 2009 Kienle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Kienle, Gunver S
Glockmann, Anja
Schink, Michael
Kiene, Helmut
Viscum album L. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research
title Viscum album L. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research
title_full Viscum album L. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research
title_fullStr Viscum album L. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research
title_full_unstemmed Viscum album L. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research
title_short Viscum album L. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research
title_sort viscum album l. extracts in breast and gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical research
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2711058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-28-79
work_keys_str_mv AT kienlegunvers viscumalbumlextractsinbreastandgynaecologicalcancersasystematicreviewofclinicalandpreclinicalresearch
AT glockmannanja viscumalbumlextractsinbreastandgynaecologicalcancersasystematicreviewofclinicalandpreclinicalresearch
AT schinkmichael viscumalbumlextractsinbreastandgynaecologicalcancersasystematicreviewofclinicalandpreclinicalresearch
AT kienehelmut viscumalbumlextractsinbreastandgynaecologicalcancersasystematicreviewofclinicalandpreclinicalresearch