Cargando…

Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies

BACKGROUND: Although there are many studies of the predictors of death in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), most combine patients with and without cirrhosis and many combine those with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature evaluating the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tandon, Puneeta, Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2711257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19141028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01957.x
_version_ 1782169431803166720
author Tandon, Puneeta
Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe
author_facet Tandon, Puneeta
Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe
author_sort Tandon, Puneeta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although there are many studies of the predictors of death in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), most combine patients with and without cirrhosis and many combine those with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature evaluating the predictors of death in patients with cirrhosis and HCC and to evaluate whether the predictors differ between patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: (i) publication in English, (ii) adult patients, (c) >80% of the patients had cirrhosis, (iv) follow-up >6 months and (v) multivariable analysis. Quality was based on the accepted quality criteria for prognostic studies. RESULTS: Of the 1106 references obtained, 947 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 23 968 patients were included in 72 studies (median, 177/study); 77% male, median age 64, 55% Child–Pugh class A. The most robust predictors of death were portal vein thrombosis, tumour size, α-foetoprotein and Child–Pugh class. Sensitivity analysis using only 15 ‘good’ studies and 22 studies in which all patients had cirrhosis yielded the same variables. In the studies including mostly compensated or decompensated patients, the predictors were both liver and tumour related. However, these studies were few and the results were not robust. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of 72 studies shows that the most robust predictors of death in patients with cirrhosis and HCC are tumour related and liver related. Future prognostic studies should include these predictors and should be performed in specific patient populations to determine whether specific prognostic indicators are more relevant at different stages of cirrhosis.
format Text
id pubmed-2711257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27112572009-07-28 Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies Tandon, Puneeta Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe Liver Int Clinical Studies BACKGROUND: Although there are many studies of the predictors of death in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), most combine patients with and without cirrhosis and many combine those with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature evaluating the predictors of death in patients with cirrhosis and HCC and to evaluate whether the predictors differ between patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: (i) publication in English, (ii) adult patients, (c) >80% of the patients had cirrhosis, (iv) follow-up >6 months and (v) multivariable analysis. Quality was based on the accepted quality criteria for prognostic studies. RESULTS: Of the 1106 references obtained, 947 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 23 968 patients were included in 72 studies (median, 177/study); 77% male, median age 64, 55% Child–Pugh class A. The most robust predictors of death were portal vein thrombosis, tumour size, α-foetoprotein and Child–Pugh class. Sensitivity analysis using only 15 ‘good’ studies and 22 studies in which all patients had cirrhosis yielded the same variables. In the studies including mostly compensated or decompensated patients, the predictors were both liver and tumour related. However, these studies were few and the results were not robust. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of 72 studies shows that the most robust predictors of death in patients with cirrhosis and HCC are tumour related and liver related. Future prognostic studies should include these predictors and should be performed in specific patient populations to determine whether specific prognostic indicators are more relevant at different stages of cirrhosis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2711257/ /pubmed/19141028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01957.x Text en © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Tandon, Puneeta
Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe
Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies
title Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies
title_full Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies
title_fullStr Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies
title_short Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies
title_sort prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2711257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19141028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01957.x
work_keys_str_mv AT tandonpuneeta prognosticindicatorsinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewof72studies
AT garciatsaoguadalupe prognosticindicatorsinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewof72studies