Cargando…

Using chemical organization theory for model checking

Motivation: The increasing number and complexity of biomodels makes automatic procedures for checking the models' properties and quality necessary. Approaches like elementary mode analysis, flux balance analysis, deficiency analysis and chemical organization theory (OT) require only the stoichi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaleta, Christoph, Richter, Stephan, Dittrich, Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp332
_version_ 1782169486180220928
author Kaleta, Christoph
Richter, Stephan
Dittrich, Peter
author_facet Kaleta, Christoph
Richter, Stephan
Dittrich, Peter
author_sort Kaleta, Christoph
collection PubMed
description Motivation: The increasing number and complexity of biomodels makes automatic procedures for checking the models' properties and quality necessary. Approaches like elementary mode analysis, flux balance analysis, deficiency analysis and chemical organization theory (OT) require only the stoichiometric structure of the reaction network for derivation of valuable information. In formalisms like Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML), however, information about the stoichiometric coefficients required for an analysis of chemical organizations can be hidden in kinetic laws. Results: First, we introduce an algorithm that uncovers stoichiometric information that might be hidden in the kinetic laws of a reaction network. This allows us to apply OT to SBML models using modifiers. Second, using the new algorithm, we performed a large-scale analysis of the 185 models contained in the manually curated BioModels Database. We found that for 41 models (22%) the set of organizations changes when modifiers are considered correctly. We discuss one of these models in detail (BIOMD149, a combined model of the ERK- and Wnt-signaling pathways), whose set of organizations drastically changes when modifiers are considered. Third, we found inconsistencies in 5 models (3%) and identified their characteristics. Compared with flux-based methods, OT is able to identify those species and reactions more accurately [in 26 cases (14%)] that can be present in a long-term simulation of the model. We conclude that our approach is a valuable tool that helps to improve the consistency of biomodels and their repositories. Availability: All data and a JAVA applet to check SBML-models is available from http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/csb/prj/ot/tools Contact: dittrich@minet.uni-jena.de Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
format Text
id pubmed-2712341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27123412009-07-21 Using chemical organization theory for model checking Kaleta, Christoph Richter, Stephan Dittrich, Peter Bioinformatics Original Papers Motivation: The increasing number and complexity of biomodels makes automatic procedures for checking the models' properties and quality necessary. Approaches like elementary mode analysis, flux balance analysis, deficiency analysis and chemical organization theory (OT) require only the stoichiometric structure of the reaction network for derivation of valuable information. In formalisms like Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML), however, information about the stoichiometric coefficients required for an analysis of chemical organizations can be hidden in kinetic laws. Results: First, we introduce an algorithm that uncovers stoichiometric information that might be hidden in the kinetic laws of a reaction network. This allows us to apply OT to SBML models using modifiers. Second, using the new algorithm, we performed a large-scale analysis of the 185 models contained in the manually curated BioModels Database. We found that for 41 models (22%) the set of organizations changes when modifiers are considered correctly. We discuss one of these models in detail (BIOMD149, a combined model of the ERK- and Wnt-signaling pathways), whose set of organizations drastically changes when modifiers are considered. Third, we found inconsistencies in 5 models (3%) and identified their characteristics. Compared with flux-based methods, OT is able to identify those species and reactions more accurately [in 26 cases (14%)] that can be present in a long-term simulation of the model. We conclude that our approach is a valuable tool that helps to improve the consistency of biomodels and their repositories. Availability: All data and a JAVA applet to check SBML-models is available from http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/csb/prj/ot/tools Contact: dittrich@minet.uni-jena.de Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2009-08-01 2009-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2712341/ /pubmed/19468053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp332 Text en © 2009 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Kaleta, Christoph
Richter, Stephan
Dittrich, Peter
Using chemical organization theory for model checking
title Using chemical organization theory for model checking
title_full Using chemical organization theory for model checking
title_fullStr Using chemical organization theory for model checking
title_full_unstemmed Using chemical organization theory for model checking
title_short Using chemical organization theory for model checking
title_sort using chemical organization theory for model checking
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19468053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp332
work_keys_str_mv AT kaletachristoph usingchemicalorganizationtheoryformodelchecking
AT richterstephan usingchemicalorganizationtheoryformodelchecking
AT dittrichpeter usingchemicalorganizationtheoryformodelchecking