Cargando…

Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Current inventories on quality of life used in oncology mainly focus on functional aspects of patients in the context of disease adaption and treatments (side) effects (EORTC QLQ C30) or generically the status of common functions (Medical Outcome Study SF 36). Beyond circumscribed dimens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kröz, Matthias, Büssing, Arndt, von Laue, Hans Broder, Reif, Marcus, Feder, Gene, Schad, Friedemann, Girke, Matthias, Matthes, Harald
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19552807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-59
_version_ 1782169489787322368
author Kröz, Matthias
Büssing, Arndt
von Laue, Hans Broder
Reif, Marcus
Feder, Gene
Schad, Friedemann
Girke, Matthias
Matthes, Harald
author_facet Kröz, Matthias
Büssing, Arndt
von Laue, Hans Broder
Reif, Marcus
Feder, Gene
Schad, Friedemann
Girke, Matthias
Matthes, Harald
author_sort Kröz, Matthias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current inventories on quality of life used in oncology mainly focus on functional aspects of patients in the context of disease adaption and treatments (side) effects (EORTC QLQ C30) or generically the status of common functions (Medical Outcome Study SF 36). Beyond circumscribed dimensions of quality of life (i.e., physical, emotional, social, cognitive etc.), there is a lack of inventories which also address other relevant dimensions such as the 'sense of coherence' (SOC) in cancer patients. SOC is important because of its potential prognostic relevance in cancer patients, but the current SOC scale has mainly been validated for psychiatric and psychosomatic patients. Our two-step validation study addresses the internal coherence (ICS) scale, which is based on expert rating, using specific items for oncological patients, with respect to its reliability, validity and sensitivity to chemotherapy. METHODS: The items were tested on 114 participants (57 cancer patients and a matched control group), alongside questions on autonomic regulation (aR), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), self-regulation (SRQ) and Karnofsky the Performance-Index (KPI). A retest of 65 participants was carried out after a median time span of four weeks. In the second part of the study, the ICS was used to assess internal coherence during chemotherapy in 25 patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and 17 breast cancer patients. ICS was recorded before, during and 4 – 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The 10-item scale of 'internal coherence' (ICS) shows good to very good reliability: Cronbach-α r = 0.91, retest-reliability r = 0.80. The ICS correlates with r = 0.43 – 0.72 to the convergence criteria (all p < 0.001). We are able to show decreased ICS-values after the third cycle for CRC and breast cancer patients, with a subsequent increase of ICS scores after the end of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The ICS has good to very good reliability, validity and sensitivity to chemotherapy.
format Text
id pubmed-2712459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27124592009-07-18 Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients Kröz, Matthias Büssing, Arndt von Laue, Hans Broder Reif, Marcus Feder, Gene Schad, Friedemann Girke, Matthias Matthes, Harald Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Current inventories on quality of life used in oncology mainly focus on functional aspects of patients in the context of disease adaption and treatments (side) effects (EORTC QLQ C30) or generically the status of common functions (Medical Outcome Study SF 36). Beyond circumscribed dimensions of quality of life (i.e., physical, emotional, social, cognitive etc.), there is a lack of inventories which also address other relevant dimensions such as the 'sense of coherence' (SOC) in cancer patients. SOC is important because of its potential prognostic relevance in cancer patients, but the current SOC scale has mainly been validated for psychiatric and psychosomatic patients. Our two-step validation study addresses the internal coherence (ICS) scale, which is based on expert rating, using specific items for oncological patients, with respect to its reliability, validity and sensitivity to chemotherapy. METHODS: The items were tested on 114 participants (57 cancer patients and a matched control group), alongside questions on autonomic regulation (aR), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), self-regulation (SRQ) and Karnofsky the Performance-Index (KPI). A retest of 65 participants was carried out after a median time span of four weeks. In the second part of the study, the ICS was used to assess internal coherence during chemotherapy in 25 patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and 17 breast cancer patients. ICS was recorded before, during and 4 – 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The 10-item scale of 'internal coherence' (ICS) shows good to very good reliability: Cronbach-α r = 0.91, retest-reliability r = 0.80. The ICS correlates with r = 0.43 – 0.72 to the convergence criteria (all p < 0.001). We are able to show decreased ICS-values after the third cycle for CRC and breast cancer patients, with a subsequent increase of ICS scores after the end of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The ICS has good to very good reliability, validity and sensitivity to chemotherapy. BioMed Central 2009-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2712459/ /pubmed/19552807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-59 Text en Copyright © 2009 Kröz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kröz, Matthias
Büssing, Arndt
von Laue, Hans Broder
Reif, Marcus
Feder, Gene
Schad, Friedemann
Girke, Matthias
Matthes, Harald
Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients
title Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients
title_full Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients
title_short Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients
title_sort reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ics) of cancer patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19552807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-59
work_keys_str_mv AT krozmatthias reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients
AT bussingarndt reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients
AT vonlauehansbroder reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients
AT reifmarcus reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients
AT federgene reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients
AT schadfriedemann reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients
AT girkematthias reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients
AT matthesharald reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients