Cargando…
Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients
BACKGROUND: Current inventories on quality of life used in oncology mainly focus on functional aspects of patients in the context of disease adaption and treatments (side) effects (EORTC QLQ C30) or generically the status of common functions (Medical Outcome Study SF 36). Beyond circumscribed dimens...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19552807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-59 |
_version_ | 1782169489787322368 |
---|---|
author | Kröz, Matthias Büssing, Arndt von Laue, Hans Broder Reif, Marcus Feder, Gene Schad, Friedemann Girke, Matthias Matthes, Harald |
author_facet | Kröz, Matthias Büssing, Arndt von Laue, Hans Broder Reif, Marcus Feder, Gene Schad, Friedemann Girke, Matthias Matthes, Harald |
author_sort | Kröz, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current inventories on quality of life used in oncology mainly focus on functional aspects of patients in the context of disease adaption and treatments (side) effects (EORTC QLQ C30) or generically the status of common functions (Medical Outcome Study SF 36). Beyond circumscribed dimensions of quality of life (i.e., physical, emotional, social, cognitive etc.), there is a lack of inventories which also address other relevant dimensions such as the 'sense of coherence' (SOC) in cancer patients. SOC is important because of its potential prognostic relevance in cancer patients, but the current SOC scale has mainly been validated for psychiatric and psychosomatic patients. Our two-step validation study addresses the internal coherence (ICS) scale, which is based on expert rating, using specific items for oncological patients, with respect to its reliability, validity and sensitivity to chemotherapy. METHODS: The items were tested on 114 participants (57 cancer patients and a matched control group), alongside questions on autonomic regulation (aR), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), self-regulation (SRQ) and Karnofsky the Performance-Index (KPI). A retest of 65 participants was carried out after a median time span of four weeks. In the second part of the study, the ICS was used to assess internal coherence during chemotherapy in 25 patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and 17 breast cancer patients. ICS was recorded before, during and 4 – 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The 10-item scale of 'internal coherence' (ICS) shows good to very good reliability: Cronbach-α r = 0.91, retest-reliability r = 0.80. The ICS correlates with r = 0.43 – 0.72 to the convergence criteria (all p < 0.001). We are able to show decreased ICS-values after the third cycle for CRC and breast cancer patients, with a subsequent increase of ICS scores after the end of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The ICS has good to very good reliability, validity and sensitivity to chemotherapy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2712459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27124592009-07-18 Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients Kröz, Matthias Büssing, Arndt von Laue, Hans Broder Reif, Marcus Feder, Gene Schad, Friedemann Girke, Matthias Matthes, Harald Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Current inventories on quality of life used in oncology mainly focus on functional aspects of patients in the context of disease adaption and treatments (side) effects (EORTC QLQ C30) or generically the status of common functions (Medical Outcome Study SF 36). Beyond circumscribed dimensions of quality of life (i.e., physical, emotional, social, cognitive etc.), there is a lack of inventories which also address other relevant dimensions such as the 'sense of coherence' (SOC) in cancer patients. SOC is important because of its potential prognostic relevance in cancer patients, but the current SOC scale has mainly been validated for psychiatric and psychosomatic patients. Our two-step validation study addresses the internal coherence (ICS) scale, which is based on expert rating, using specific items for oncological patients, with respect to its reliability, validity and sensitivity to chemotherapy. METHODS: The items were tested on 114 participants (57 cancer patients and a matched control group), alongside questions on autonomic regulation (aR), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), self-regulation (SRQ) and Karnofsky the Performance-Index (KPI). A retest of 65 participants was carried out after a median time span of four weeks. In the second part of the study, the ICS was used to assess internal coherence during chemotherapy in 25 patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and 17 breast cancer patients. ICS was recorded before, during and 4 – 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The 10-item scale of 'internal coherence' (ICS) shows good to very good reliability: Cronbach-α r = 0.91, retest-reliability r = 0.80. The ICS correlates with r = 0.43 – 0.72 to the convergence criteria (all p < 0.001). We are able to show decreased ICS-values after the third cycle for CRC and breast cancer patients, with a subsequent increase of ICS scores after the end of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The ICS has good to very good reliability, validity and sensitivity to chemotherapy. BioMed Central 2009-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2712459/ /pubmed/19552807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-59 Text en Copyright © 2009 Kröz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Kröz, Matthias Büssing, Arndt von Laue, Hans Broder Reif, Marcus Feder, Gene Schad, Friedemann Girke, Matthias Matthes, Harald Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients |
title | Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients |
title_full | Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients |
title_short | Reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ICS) of cancer patients |
title_sort | reliability and validity of a new scale on internal coherence (ics) of cancer patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19552807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-59 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krozmatthias reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients AT bussingarndt reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients AT vonlauehansbroder reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients AT reifmarcus reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients AT federgene reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients AT schadfriedemann reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients AT girkematthias reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients AT matthesharald reliabilityandvalidityofanewscaleoninternalcoherenceicsofcancerpatients |