Cargando…
Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma
The lack of effective drugs in stage IV melanoma has impacted the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in stage II/III disease. To date, chemotherapy, immunostimulants and vaccines have been used with minimal success. Interferon (IFN) has shown an effect on relapse-free survival (RFS) in several clin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19617295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp250 |
_version_ | 1782169505217118208 |
---|---|
author | Eggermont, A. M. M. Testori, A. Marsden, J. Hersey, P. Quirt, I. Petrella, T. Gogas, H. MacKie, R. M. Hauschild, A. |
author_facet | Eggermont, A. M. M. Testori, A. Marsden, J. Hersey, P. Quirt, I. Petrella, T. Gogas, H. MacKie, R. M. Hauschild, A. |
author_sort | Eggermont, A. M. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The lack of effective drugs in stage IV melanoma has impacted the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in stage II/III disease. To date, chemotherapy, immunostimulants and vaccines have been used with minimal success. Interferon (IFN) has shown an effect on relapse-free survival (RFS) in several clinical trials; however, without a clinically significant effect on overall survival (OS). A recently conducted meta-analysis demonstrated prolongation of disease-free survival (DFS) in 7% and OS benefit in 3% of IFN-treated patients when compared with observation-only patients. There were no clear differences for the dose and duration of treatment observed. Observation is still an appropriate control arm in adjuvant clinical trials. Regional differences exist in Europe in the adjuvant use of IFN. In Northwest Europe, IFN is infrequently prescribed. In Central and Mediterranean Europe, dermatologists commonly prescribe low-dose IFN therapy for AJCC stage II and III disease. High-dose IFN regimens are not commonly used. The population of patients that may benefit from IFN needs to be further characterised, potentially by finding biomarkers that can predict response. Such studies are ongoing. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2712588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27125882009-08-01 Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma Eggermont, A. M. M. Testori, A. Marsden, J. Hersey, P. Quirt, I. Petrella, T. Gogas, H. MacKie, R. M. Hauschild, A. Ann Oncol Articles The lack of effective drugs in stage IV melanoma has impacted the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in stage II/III disease. To date, chemotherapy, immunostimulants and vaccines have been used with minimal success. Interferon (IFN) has shown an effect on relapse-free survival (RFS) in several clinical trials; however, without a clinically significant effect on overall survival (OS). A recently conducted meta-analysis demonstrated prolongation of disease-free survival (DFS) in 7% and OS benefit in 3% of IFN-treated patients when compared with observation-only patients. There were no clear differences for the dose and duration of treatment observed. Observation is still an appropriate control arm in adjuvant clinical trials. Regional differences exist in Europe in the adjuvant use of IFN. In Northwest Europe, IFN is infrequently prescribed. In Central and Mediterranean Europe, dermatologists commonly prescribe low-dose IFN therapy for AJCC stage II and III disease. High-dose IFN regimens are not commonly used. The population of patients that may benefit from IFN needs to be further characterised, potentially by finding biomarkers that can predict response. Such studies are ongoing. Oxford University Press 2009-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2712588/ /pubmed/19617295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp250 Text en © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. users are entitle to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and the European Society for Medical Oncology are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org |
spellingShingle | Articles Eggermont, A. M. M. Testori, A. Marsden, J. Hersey, P. Quirt, I. Petrella, T. Gogas, H. MacKie, R. M. Hauschild, A. Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma |
title | Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma |
title_full | Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma |
title_fullStr | Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma |
title_short | Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma |
title_sort | utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19617295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eggermontamm utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma AT testoria utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma AT marsdenj utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma AT herseyp utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma AT quirti utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma AT petrellat utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma AT gogash utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma AT mackierm utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma AT hauschilda utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma |