Cargando…

Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma

The lack of effective drugs in stage IV melanoma has impacted the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in stage II/III disease. To date, chemotherapy, immunostimulants and vaccines have been used with minimal success. Interferon (IFN) has shown an effect on relapse-free survival (RFS) in several clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eggermont, A. M. M., Testori, A., Marsden, J., Hersey, P., Quirt, I., Petrella, T., Gogas, H., MacKie, R. M., Hauschild, A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19617295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp250
_version_ 1782169505217118208
author Eggermont, A. M. M.
Testori, A.
Marsden, J.
Hersey, P.
Quirt, I.
Petrella, T.
Gogas, H.
MacKie, R. M.
Hauschild, A.
author_facet Eggermont, A. M. M.
Testori, A.
Marsden, J.
Hersey, P.
Quirt, I.
Petrella, T.
Gogas, H.
MacKie, R. M.
Hauschild, A.
author_sort Eggermont, A. M. M.
collection PubMed
description The lack of effective drugs in stage IV melanoma has impacted the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in stage II/III disease. To date, chemotherapy, immunostimulants and vaccines have been used with minimal success. Interferon (IFN) has shown an effect on relapse-free survival (RFS) in several clinical trials; however, without a clinically significant effect on overall survival (OS). A recently conducted meta-analysis demonstrated prolongation of disease-free survival (DFS) in 7% and OS benefit in 3% of IFN-treated patients when compared with observation-only patients. There were no clear differences for the dose and duration of treatment observed. Observation is still an appropriate control arm in adjuvant clinical trials. Regional differences exist in Europe in the adjuvant use of IFN. In Northwest Europe, IFN is infrequently prescribed. In Central and Mediterranean Europe, dermatologists commonly prescribe low-dose IFN therapy for AJCC stage II and III disease. High-dose IFN regimens are not commonly used. The population of patients that may benefit from IFN needs to be further characterised, potentially by finding biomarkers that can predict response. Such studies are ongoing.
format Text
id pubmed-2712588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27125882009-08-01 Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma Eggermont, A. M. M. Testori, A. Marsden, J. Hersey, P. Quirt, I. Petrella, T. Gogas, H. MacKie, R. M. Hauschild, A. Ann Oncol Articles The lack of effective drugs in stage IV melanoma has impacted the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in stage II/III disease. To date, chemotherapy, immunostimulants and vaccines have been used with minimal success. Interferon (IFN) has shown an effect on relapse-free survival (RFS) in several clinical trials; however, without a clinically significant effect on overall survival (OS). A recently conducted meta-analysis demonstrated prolongation of disease-free survival (DFS) in 7% and OS benefit in 3% of IFN-treated patients when compared with observation-only patients. There were no clear differences for the dose and duration of treatment observed. Observation is still an appropriate control arm in adjuvant clinical trials. Regional differences exist in Europe in the adjuvant use of IFN. In Northwest Europe, IFN is infrequently prescribed. In Central and Mediterranean Europe, dermatologists commonly prescribe low-dose IFN therapy for AJCC stage II and III disease. High-dose IFN regimens are not commonly used. The population of patients that may benefit from IFN needs to be further characterised, potentially by finding biomarkers that can predict response. Such studies are ongoing. Oxford University Press 2009-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2712588/ /pubmed/19617295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp250 Text en © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. users are entitle to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and the European Society for Medical Oncology are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
spellingShingle Articles
Eggermont, A. M. M.
Testori, A.
Marsden, J.
Hersey, P.
Quirt, I.
Petrella, T.
Gogas, H.
MacKie, R. M.
Hauschild, A.
Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma
title Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma
title_full Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma
title_fullStr Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma
title_short Utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma
title_sort utility of adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2712588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19617295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp250
work_keys_str_mv AT eggermontamm utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma
AT testoria utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma
AT marsdenj utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma
AT herseyp utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma
AT quirti utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma
AT petrellat utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma
AT gogash utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma
AT mackierm utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma
AT hauschilda utilityofadjuvantsystemictherapyinmelanoma