Cargando…

Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In London and the rest of the UK, diseases associated with poor diet, inadequate physical activity and mental illness account for a large proportion of area based health inequality. There is a lack of evidence on interventions promoting healthier behaviours especially in marginalised pop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wall, Martin, Hayes, Richard, Moore, Derek, Petticrew, Mark, Clow, Angela, Schmidt, Elena, Draper, Alizon, Lock, Karen, Lynch, Rebecca, Renton, Adrian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2713231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-207
_version_ 1782169561660915712
author Wall, Martin
Hayes, Richard
Moore, Derek
Petticrew, Mark
Clow, Angela
Schmidt, Elena
Draper, Alizon
Lock, Karen
Lynch, Rebecca
Renton, Adrian
author_facet Wall, Martin
Hayes, Richard
Moore, Derek
Petticrew, Mark
Clow, Angela
Schmidt, Elena
Draper, Alizon
Lock, Karen
Lynch, Rebecca
Renton, Adrian
author_sort Wall, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In London and the rest of the UK, diseases associated with poor diet, inadequate physical activity and mental illness account for a large proportion of area based health inequality. There is a lack of evidence on interventions promoting healthier behaviours especially in marginalised populations, at a structural or ecological level and utilising a community development approach. The Well London project financed by the Big Lottery 'Wellbeing' Fund and implemented by a consortium of London based agencies led by the Greater London Authority and the London Health Commission is implementing a set of complex interventions across 20 deprived areas of London. The interventions focus on healthy eating, healthy physical activity and mental health and wellbeing and are designed and executed with community participation complementing existing facilities and services. METHODS/DESIGN: The programme will be evaluated through a cluster randomised controlled trial. Forty areas across London were chosen based on deprivation scores. Areas were characterised by high proportion of Black and Minority Ethnic residents, worklessness, ill-health and poor physical environments. Twenty areas were randomly assigned to the intervention arm of Well London project and twenty 'matched' areas assigned as controls. Measures of physical activity, diet and mental health are collected at start and end of the project and compared to assess impact. The quantitative element will be complemented by a longitudinal qualitative study elucidating pathways of influence between intervention activities and health outcomes. A related element of the study investigates the health-related aspects of the structural and ecological characteristics of the project areas. The project 'process' will also be evaluated. DISCUSSION: The size of the project and the fact that the interventions are 'complex' in the sense that firstly, there are a number of interacting components with a wide range of groups and organisational levels targeted by the intervention, and secondly, a degree of flexibility or tailoring of the intervention, makes this trial potentially very useful in providing evidence of the types of activities that can be used to address chronic health problems in communities suffering from multiple deprivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68175121
format Text
id pubmed-2713231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27132312009-07-21 Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial Wall, Martin Hayes, Richard Moore, Derek Petticrew, Mark Clow, Angela Schmidt, Elena Draper, Alizon Lock, Karen Lynch, Rebecca Renton, Adrian BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In London and the rest of the UK, diseases associated with poor diet, inadequate physical activity and mental illness account for a large proportion of area based health inequality. There is a lack of evidence on interventions promoting healthier behaviours especially in marginalised populations, at a structural or ecological level and utilising a community development approach. The Well London project financed by the Big Lottery 'Wellbeing' Fund and implemented by a consortium of London based agencies led by the Greater London Authority and the London Health Commission is implementing a set of complex interventions across 20 deprived areas of London. The interventions focus on healthy eating, healthy physical activity and mental health and wellbeing and are designed and executed with community participation complementing existing facilities and services. METHODS/DESIGN: The programme will be evaluated through a cluster randomised controlled trial. Forty areas across London were chosen based on deprivation scores. Areas were characterised by high proportion of Black and Minority Ethnic residents, worklessness, ill-health and poor physical environments. Twenty areas were randomly assigned to the intervention arm of Well London project and twenty 'matched' areas assigned as controls. Measures of physical activity, diet and mental health are collected at start and end of the project and compared to assess impact. The quantitative element will be complemented by a longitudinal qualitative study elucidating pathways of influence between intervention activities and health outcomes. A related element of the study investigates the health-related aspects of the structural and ecological characteristics of the project areas. The project 'process' will also be evaluated. DISCUSSION: The size of the project and the fact that the interventions are 'complex' in the sense that firstly, there are a number of interacting components with a wide range of groups and organisational levels targeted by the intervention, and secondly, a degree of flexibility or tailoring of the intervention, makes this trial potentially very useful in providing evidence of the types of activities that can be used to address chronic health problems in communities suffering from multiple deprivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68175121 BioMed Central 2009-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2713231/ /pubmed/19558712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-207 Text en Copyright © 2009 Wall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wall, Martin
Hayes, Richard
Moore, Derek
Petticrew, Mark
Clow, Angela
Schmidt, Elena
Draper, Alizon
Lock, Karen
Lynch, Rebecca
Renton, Adrian
Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2713231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-207
work_keys_str_mv AT wallmartin evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hayesrichard evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moorederek evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT petticrewmark evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clowangela evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmidtelena evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT draperalizon evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lockkaren evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lynchrebecca evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rentonadrian evaluationofcommunitylevelinterventionstoaddresssocialandstructuraldeterminantsofhealthaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial