Cargando…

Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) with an implantable pump has been available for the past 25 years. CIPII, with its specific pharmacodynamic properties, may be a viable treatment alternative to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes for whom other the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Logtenberg, Susan J., Kleefstra, Nanne, Houweling, Sebastiaan T., Groenier, Klaas H., Gans, Reinold O., van Ballegooie, Evert, Bilo, Henk J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2713651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19429874
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-2340
_version_ 1782169596185280512
author Logtenberg, Susan J.
Kleefstra, Nanne
Houweling, Sebastiaan T.
Groenier, Klaas H.
Gans, Reinold O.
van Ballegooie, Evert
Bilo, Henk J.
author_facet Logtenberg, Susan J.
Kleefstra, Nanne
Houweling, Sebastiaan T.
Groenier, Klaas H.
Gans, Reinold O.
van Ballegooie, Evert
Bilo, Henk J.
author_sort Logtenberg, Susan J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) with an implantable pump has been available for the past 25 years. CIPII, with its specific pharmacodynamic properties, may be a viable treatment alternative to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes for whom other therapies have failed. There have been few studies in which CIPII was compared with subcutaneous insulin treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes with poor glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In an open-label, prospective, crossover, randomized, 16-month study, the effects of CIPII and subcutaneous insulin were compared in 24 patients. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of hypoglycemia. Secondary outcome measures were A1C, and glucose profile, including time in euglycemia, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: The incidence of grade 1 hypoglycemic events was 4.0 ± 2.6 per week with subcutaneous insulin compared with 3.5 ± 2.3 per week during CIPII (P = 0.13). The absolute mean difference in A1C with CIPII compared with subcutaneous treatment was −0.76% (95% CI −1.41 to −0.11) (P = 0.03). Baseline time spent in euglycemia was 45.2 ± 12.6% and increased 10.9% (4.6–17.3) with CIPII compared with subcutaneous treatment (absolute value; P = 0.003). There were no differences in the occurrence rate for severe hypoglycemic events, daily insulin use, or BMI. No pump or catheter malfunction was observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Although we did not observe a significant reduction in hypoglycemic events, improved glycemic control was achieved with the use of CIPII. We saw a 0.8% decrease in A1C and an 11% increase in the time spent in euglycemia.
format Text
id pubmed-2713651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27136512010-08-01 Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial Logtenberg, Susan J. Kleefstra, Nanne Houweling, Sebastiaan T. Groenier, Klaas H. Gans, Reinold O. van Ballegooie, Evert Bilo, Henk J. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) with an implantable pump has been available for the past 25 years. CIPII, with its specific pharmacodynamic properties, may be a viable treatment alternative to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes for whom other therapies have failed. There have been few studies in which CIPII was compared with subcutaneous insulin treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes with poor glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In an open-label, prospective, crossover, randomized, 16-month study, the effects of CIPII and subcutaneous insulin were compared in 24 patients. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of hypoglycemia. Secondary outcome measures were A1C, and glucose profile, including time in euglycemia, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: The incidence of grade 1 hypoglycemic events was 4.0 ± 2.6 per week with subcutaneous insulin compared with 3.5 ± 2.3 per week during CIPII (P = 0.13). The absolute mean difference in A1C with CIPII compared with subcutaneous treatment was −0.76% (95% CI −1.41 to −0.11) (P = 0.03). Baseline time spent in euglycemia was 45.2 ± 12.6% and increased 10.9% (4.6–17.3) with CIPII compared with subcutaneous treatment (absolute value; P = 0.003). There were no differences in the occurrence rate for severe hypoglycemic events, daily insulin use, or BMI. No pump or catheter malfunction was observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Although we did not observe a significant reduction in hypoglycemic events, improved glycemic control was achieved with the use of CIPII. We saw a 0.8% decrease in A1C and an 11% increase in the time spent in euglycemia. American Diabetes Association 2009-08 2009-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2713651/ /pubmed/19429874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-2340 Text en © 2009 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Logtenberg, Susan J.
Kleefstra, Nanne
Houweling, Sebastiaan T.
Groenier, Klaas H.
Gans, Reinold O.
van Ballegooie, Evert
Bilo, Henk J.
Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
title Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort improved glycemic control with intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin in type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2713651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19429874
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-2340
work_keys_str_mv AT logtenbergsusanj improvedglycemiccontrolwithintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulinintype1diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kleefstrananne improvedglycemiccontrolwithintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulinintype1diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT houwelingsebastiaant improvedglycemiccontrolwithintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulinintype1diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT groenierklaash improvedglycemiccontrolwithintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulinintype1diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gansreinoldo improvedglycemiccontrolwithintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulinintype1diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanballegooieevert improvedglycemiccontrolwithintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulinintype1diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bilohenkj improvedglycemiccontrolwithintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulinintype1diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial