Cargando…

Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of youth development in reducing teenage pregnancy, substance use, and other outcomes. Design Prospective matched comparison study. Setting 54 youth service sites in England. Participants Young people (n=2724) aged 13-15 years at baseline deemed by professiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiggins, Meg, Bonell, Chris, Sawtell, Mary, Austerberry, Helen, Burchett, Helen, Allen, Elizabeth, Strange, Vicki
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19584408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2534
_version_ 1782169697818509312
author Wiggins, Meg
Bonell, Chris
Sawtell, Mary
Austerberry, Helen
Burchett, Helen
Allen, Elizabeth
Strange, Vicki
author_facet Wiggins, Meg
Bonell, Chris
Sawtell, Mary
Austerberry, Helen
Burchett, Helen
Allen, Elizabeth
Strange, Vicki
author_sort Wiggins, Meg
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of youth development in reducing teenage pregnancy, substance use, and other outcomes. Design Prospective matched comparison study. Setting 54 youth service sites in England. Participants Young people (n=2724) aged 13-15 years at baseline deemed by professionals as at risk of teenage pregnancy, substance misuse, or school exclusion or to be vulnerable. Intervention Intensive, multicomponent youth development programme including sex and drugs education (Young People’s Development Programme) versus standard youth provision. Main outcome measures Various, including pregnancy, weekly cannabis use, and monthly drunkenness at 18 months. Results Young women in the intervention group more commonly reported pregnancy than did those in the comparison group (16% v 6%; adjusted odds ratio 3.55, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 9.50). Young women in the intervention group also more commonly reported early heterosexual experience (58% v 33%; adjusted odds ratio 2.53, 1.09 to 5.92) and expectation of teenage parenthood (34% v 24%; 1.61, 1.07 to 2.43). Conclusions No evidence was found that the intervention was effective in delaying heterosexual experience or reducing pregnancies, drunkenness, or cannabis use. Some results suggested an adverse effect. Although methodological limitations may at least partly explain these findings, any further implementation of such interventions in the UK should be only within randomised trials.
format Text
id pubmed-2714682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27146822009-07-23 Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study Wiggins, Meg Bonell, Chris Sawtell, Mary Austerberry, Helen Burchett, Helen Allen, Elizabeth Strange, Vicki BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of youth development in reducing teenage pregnancy, substance use, and other outcomes. Design Prospective matched comparison study. Setting 54 youth service sites in England. Participants Young people (n=2724) aged 13-15 years at baseline deemed by professionals as at risk of teenage pregnancy, substance misuse, or school exclusion or to be vulnerable. Intervention Intensive, multicomponent youth development programme including sex and drugs education (Young People’s Development Programme) versus standard youth provision. Main outcome measures Various, including pregnancy, weekly cannabis use, and monthly drunkenness at 18 months. Results Young women in the intervention group more commonly reported pregnancy than did those in the comparison group (16% v 6%; adjusted odds ratio 3.55, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 9.50). Young women in the intervention group also more commonly reported early heterosexual experience (58% v 33%; adjusted odds ratio 2.53, 1.09 to 5.92) and expectation of teenage parenthood (34% v 24%; 1.61, 1.07 to 2.43). Conclusions No evidence was found that the intervention was effective in delaying heterosexual experience or reducing pregnancies, drunkenness, or cannabis use. Some results suggested an adverse effect. Although methodological limitations may at least partly explain these findings, any further implementation of such interventions in the UK should be only within randomised trials. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2714682/ /pubmed/19584408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2534 Text en © Wiggins et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wiggins, Meg
Bonell, Chris
Sawtell, Mary
Austerberry, Helen
Burchett, Helen
Allen, Elizabeth
Strange, Vicki
Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study
title Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study
title_full Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study
title_fullStr Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study
title_short Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study
title_sort health outcomes of youth development programme in england: prospective matched comparison study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19584408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2534
work_keys_str_mv AT wigginsmeg healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy
AT bonellchris healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy
AT sawtellmary healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy
AT austerberryhelen healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy
AT burchetthelen healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy
AT allenelizabeth healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy
AT strangevicki healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy