Cargando…
Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of youth development in reducing teenage pregnancy, substance use, and other outcomes. Design Prospective matched comparison study. Setting 54 youth service sites in England. Participants Young people (n=2724) aged 13-15 years at baseline deemed by professiona...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19584408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2534 |
_version_ | 1782169697818509312 |
---|---|
author | Wiggins, Meg Bonell, Chris Sawtell, Mary Austerberry, Helen Burchett, Helen Allen, Elizabeth Strange, Vicki |
author_facet | Wiggins, Meg Bonell, Chris Sawtell, Mary Austerberry, Helen Burchett, Helen Allen, Elizabeth Strange, Vicki |
author_sort | Wiggins, Meg |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of youth development in reducing teenage pregnancy, substance use, and other outcomes. Design Prospective matched comparison study. Setting 54 youth service sites in England. Participants Young people (n=2724) aged 13-15 years at baseline deemed by professionals as at risk of teenage pregnancy, substance misuse, or school exclusion or to be vulnerable. Intervention Intensive, multicomponent youth development programme including sex and drugs education (Young People’s Development Programme) versus standard youth provision. Main outcome measures Various, including pregnancy, weekly cannabis use, and monthly drunkenness at 18 months. Results Young women in the intervention group more commonly reported pregnancy than did those in the comparison group (16% v 6%; adjusted odds ratio 3.55, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 9.50). Young women in the intervention group also more commonly reported early heterosexual experience (58% v 33%; adjusted odds ratio 2.53, 1.09 to 5.92) and expectation of teenage parenthood (34% v 24%; 1.61, 1.07 to 2.43). Conclusions No evidence was found that the intervention was effective in delaying heterosexual experience or reducing pregnancies, drunkenness, or cannabis use. Some results suggested an adverse effect. Although methodological limitations may at least partly explain these findings, any further implementation of such interventions in the UK should be only within randomised trials. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2714682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27146822009-07-23 Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study Wiggins, Meg Bonell, Chris Sawtell, Mary Austerberry, Helen Burchett, Helen Allen, Elizabeth Strange, Vicki BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of youth development in reducing teenage pregnancy, substance use, and other outcomes. Design Prospective matched comparison study. Setting 54 youth service sites in England. Participants Young people (n=2724) aged 13-15 years at baseline deemed by professionals as at risk of teenage pregnancy, substance misuse, or school exclusion or to be vulnerable. Intervention Intensive, multicomponent youth development programme including sex and drugs education (Young People’s Development Programme) versus standard youth provision. Main outcome measures Various, including pregnancy, weekly cannabis use, and monthly drunkenness at 18 months. Results Young women in the intervention group more commonly reported pregnancy than did those in the comparison group (16% v 6%; adjusted odds ratio 3.55, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 9.50). Young women in the intervention group also more commonly reported early heterosexual experience (58% v 33%; adjusted odds ratio 2.53, 1.09 to 5.92) and expectation of teenage parenthood (34% v 24%; 1.61, 1.07 to 2.43). Conclusions No evidence was found that the intervention was effective in delaying heterosexual experience or reducing pregnancies, drunkenness, or cannabis use. Some results suggested an adverse effect. Although methodological limitations may at least partly explain these findings, any further implementation of such interventions in the UK should be only within randomised trials. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2714682/ /pubmed/19584408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2534 Text en © Wiggins et al 2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Wiggins, Meg Bonell, Chris Sawtell, Mary Austerberry, Helen Burchett, Helen Allen, Elizabeth Strange, Vicki Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study |
title | Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study |
title_full | Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study |
title_fullStr | Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study |
title_short | Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study |
title_sort | health outcomes of youth development programme in england: prospective matched comparison study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19584408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wigginsmeg healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy AT bonellchris healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy AT sawtellmary healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy AT austerberryhelen healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy AT burchetthelen healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy AT allenelizabeth healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy AT strangevicki healthoutcomesofyouthdevelopmentprogrammeinenglandprospectivematchedcomparisonstudy |