Cargando…

Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates

BACKGROUND: In case of contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB), administration of pamidronate intravenously is a widely used alternative. In this study we compared the effect on change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip during long term treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eekman, Danielle A, Vis, Marijn, Bultink, Irene EM, Derikx, Harm JGM, Dijkmans, Ben AC, Lems, Willem F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19604377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-86
_version_ 1782169701875449856
author Eekman, Danielle A
Vis, Marijn
Bultink, Irene EM
Derikx, Harm JGM
Dijkmans, Ben AC
Lems, Willem F
author_facet Eekman, Danielle A
Vis, Marijn
Bultink, Irene EM
Derikx, Harm JGM
Dijkmans, Ben AC
Lems, Willem F
author_sort Eekman, Danielle A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In case of contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB), administration of pamidronate intravenously is a widely used alternative. In this study we compared the effect on change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip during long term treatment with pamidronate iv in comparison to OB. METHODS: We studied 61 patients receiving treatment for at least two years. In case of contraindications or intolerance (within 3 months) of an OB, pamidronate iv was started. BMD was measured on a Hologic 4500 and a Lunar DPX-IQ at the spine (L1-L4) and total hip. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the OB group and 30 in the intravenous pamidronate group. Mean follow-up duration (SD) was 4.3 (1.3) years. We observed a significant increase (p < 0.001) in spinal BMD, both in the OB group (8.3%) as well as in the pamidronate iv group (6.1%), but no significant difference in BMD change between the OB and pamidronate iv groups. At the hips, we observed a tendency to increased BMD in both groups, 1.1% in the OB and 1.4% in the pamidronate iv group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative for oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates.
format Text
id pubmed-2714827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27148272009-07-24 Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates Eekman, Danielle A Vis, Marijn Bultink, Irene EM Derikx, Harm JGM Dijkmans, Ben AC Lems, Willem F BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In case of contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB), administration of pamidronate intravenously is a widely used alternative. In this study we compared the effect on change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip during long term treatment with pamidronate iv in comparison to OB. METHODS: We studied 61 patients receiving treatment for at least two years. In case of contraindications or intolerance (within 3 months) of an OB, pamidronate iv was started. BMD was measured on a Hologic 4500 and a Lunar DPX-IQ at the spine (L1-L4) and total hip. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the OB group and 30 in the intravenous pamidronate group. Mean follow-up duration (SD) was 4.3 (1.3) years. We observed a significant increase (p < 0.001) in spinal BMD, both in the OB group (8.3%) as well as in the pamidronate iv group (6.1%), but no significant difference in BMD change between the OB and pamidronate iv groups. At the hips, we observed a tendency to increased BMD in both groups, 1.1% in the OB and 1.4% in the pamidronate iv group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative for oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates. BioMed Central 2009-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2714827/ /pubmed/19604377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-86 Text en Copyright © 2009 Eekman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eekman, Danielle A
Vis, Marijn
Bultink, Irene EM
Derikx, Harm JGM
Dijkmans, Ben AC
Lems, Willem F
Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates
title Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates
title_full Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates
title_fullStr Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates
title_full_unstemmed Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates
title_short Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates
title_sort treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19604377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-86
work_keys_str_mv AT eekmandaniellea treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates
AT vismarijn treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates
AT bultinkireneem treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates
AT derikxharmjgm treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates
AT dijkmansbenac treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates
AT lemswillemf treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates