Cargando…
Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates
BACKGROUND: In case of contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB), administration of pamidronate intravenously is a widely used alternative. In this study we compared the effect on change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip during long term treatm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19604377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-86 |
_version_ | 1782169701875449856 |
---|---|
author | Eekman, Danielle A Vis, Marijn Bultink, Irene EM Derikx, Harm JGM Dijkmans, Ben AC Lems, Willem F |
author_facet | Eekman, Danielle A Vis, Marijn Bultink, Irene EM Derikx, Harm JGM Dijkmans, Ben AC Lems, Willem F |
author_sort | Eekman, Danielle A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In case of contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB), administration of pamidronate intravenously is a widely used alternative. In this study we compared the effect on change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip during long term treatment with pamidronate iv in comparison to OB. METHODS: We studied 61 patients receiving treatment for at least two years. In case of contraindications or intolerance (within 3 months) of an OB, pamidronate iv was started. BMD was measured on a Hologic 4500 and a Lunar DPX-IQ at the spine (L1-L4) and total hip. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the OB group and 30 in the intravenous pamidronate group. Mean follow-up duration (SD) was 4.3 (1.3) years. We observed a significant increase (p < 0.001) in spinal BMD, both in the OB group (8.3%) as well as in the pamidronate iv group (6.1%), but no significant difference in BMD change between the OB and pamidronate iv groups. At the hips, we observed a tendency to increased BMD in both groups, 1.1% in the OB and 1.4% in the pamidronate iv group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative for oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2714827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27148272009-07-24 Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates Eekman, Danielle A Vis, Marijn Bultink, Irene EM Derikx, Harm JGM Dijkmans, Ben AC Lems, Willem F BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In case of contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB), administration of pamidronate intravenously is a widely used alternative. In this study we compared the effect on change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip during long term treatment with pamidronate iv in comparison to OB. METHODS: We studied 61 patients receiving treatment for at least two years. In case of contraindications or intolerance (within 3 months) of an OB, pamidronate iv was started. BMD was measured on a Hologic 4500 and a Lunar DPX-IQ at the spine (L1-L4) and total hip. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the OB group and 30 in the intravenous pamidronate group. Mean follow-up duration (SD) was 4.3 (1.3) years. We observed a significant increase (p < 0.001) in spinal BMD, both in the OB group (8.3%) as well as in the pamidronate iv group (6.1%), but no significant difference in BMD change between the OB and pamidronate iv groups. At the hips, we observed a tendency to increased BMD in both groups, 1.1% in the OB and 1.4% in the pamidronate iv group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative for oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with contraindications or intolerance during treatment with oral bisphosphonates. BioMed Central 2009-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2714827/ /pubmed/19604377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-86 Text en Copyright © 2009 Eekman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Eekman, Danielle A Vis, Marijn Bultink, Irene EM Derikx, Harm JGM Dijkmans, Ben AC Lems, Willem F Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates |
title | Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates |
title_full | Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates |
title_fullStr | Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates |
title_short | Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates |
title_sort | treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19604377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-86 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eekmandaniellea treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates AT vismarijn treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates AT bultinkireneem treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates AT derikxharmjgm treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates AT dijkmansbenac treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates AT lemswillemf treatmentwithintravenouspamidronateisagoodalternativeincaseofgastrointestinalsideeffectsorcontraindicationsfororalbisphosphonates |