Cargando…
Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy
BACKGROUND: Adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy is poor, and linked with patient perceptions of the benefits of, and barriers to taking these treatments. To better understand the association between patient perceptions and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, we generated thirteen items that may tap...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-133 |
_version_ | 1782169709441974272 |
---|---|
author | Cadarette, Suzanne M Gignac, Monique AM Jaglal, Susan B Beaton, Dorcas E Hawker, Gillian A |
author_facet | Cadarette, Suzanne M Gignac, Monique AM Jaglal, Susan B Beaton, Dorcas E Hawker, Gillian A |
author_sort | Cadarette, Suzanne M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy is poor, and linked with patient perceptions of the benefits of, and barriers to taking these treatments. To better understand the association between patient perceptions and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, we generated thirteen items that may tap into patient perceptions about the benefits of, and barriers to osteoporosis treatment; and included these items as part of a standardized telephone interview of women aged 65–90 years (n = 871). The purpose of this paper is to report the psychometric evaluation of our scale. FINDINGS: Upon detailed analysis, six of the thirteen items were omitted: four redundant, one did not correlate well with any other item and one factorial complex. From the remaining seven items, two distinct unidimensional domains emerged (variance explained = 78%). Internal consistency of the 5-item osteoporosis drug treatment benefits domain was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and was supported by construct validity; women reporting a physician-diagnosis or taking osteoporosis pharmacotherapy had higher osteoporosis treatment benefit scores compared to those reporting no osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment respectively. Because only two items were identified as tapping into treatment barriers, we recommend they each be used as a separate item assessing potential barriers to adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, rather than combined into a single scale. CONCLUSION: The 5-item osteoporosis drug treatment benefits scale may be useful to examine perceptions about the benefits of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Further research is needed to develop scales that adequately measure perceived barriers to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2714860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27148602009-07-24 Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy Cadarette, Suzanne M Gignac, Monique AM Jaglal, Susan B Beaton, Dorcas E Hawker, Gillian A BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy is poor, and linked with patient perceptions of the benefits of, and barriers to taking these treatments. To better understand the association between patient perceptions and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, we generated thirteen items that may tap into patient perceptions about the benefits of, and barriers to osteoporosis treatment; and included these items as part of a standardized telephone interview of women aged 65–90 years (n = 871). The purpose of this paper is to report the psychometric evaluation of our scale. FINDINGS: Upon detailed analysis, six of the thirteen items were omitted: four redundant, one did not correlate well with any other item and one factorial complex. From the remaining seven items, two distinct unidimensional domains emerged (variance explained = 78%). Internal consistency of the 5-item osteoporosis drug treatment benefits domain was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and was supported by construct validity; women reporting a physician-diagnosis or taking osteoporosis pharmacotherapy had higher osteoporosis treatment benefit scores compared to those reporting no osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment respectively. Because only two items were identified as tapping into treatment barriers, we recommend they each be used as a separate item assessing potential barriers to adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, rather than combined into a single scale. CONCLUSION: The 5-item osteoporosis drug treatment benefits scale may be useful to examine perceptions about the benefits of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Further research is needed to develop scales that adequately measure perceived barriers to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. BioMed Central 2009-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2714860/ /pubmed/19602268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-133 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cadarette et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Cadarette, Suzanne M Gignac, Monique AM Jaglal, Susan B Beaton, Dorcas E Hawker, Gillian A Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy |
title | Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy |
title_full | Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy |
title_fullStr | Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy |
title_short | Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy |
title_sort | measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cadarettesuzannem measuringpatientperceptionsaboutosteoporosispharmacotherapy AT gignacmoniqueam measuringpatientperceptionsaboutosteoporosispharmacotherapy AT jaglalsusanb measuringpatientperceptionsaboutosteoporosispharmacotherapy AT beatondorcase measuringpatientperceptionsaboutosteoporosispharmacotherapy AT hawkergilliana measuringpatientperceptionsaboutosteoporosispharmacotherapy |